Semi-Markov Multistate Modeling Approaches for Multicohort Event History Data

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Xavier Piulachs, Klaus Langohr, Mireia Besalú, Natàlia Pallarès, Jordi Carratalà, Cristian Tebé, Guadalupe Gómez Melis
{"title":"Semi-Markov Multistate Modeling Approaches for Multicohort Event History Data","authors":"Xavier Piulachs,&nbsp;Klaus Langohr,&nbsp;Mireia Besalú,&nbsp;Natàlia Pallarès,&nbsp;Jordi Carratalà,&nbsp;Cristian Tebé,&nbsp;Guadalupe Gómez Melis","doi":"10.1002/bimj.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Two Cox-based multistate modeling approaches are compared for modeling a complex multicohort event history process. The first approach incorporates cohort information as a fixed covariate, thereby providing a direct estimation of the cohort-specific effects. The second approach includes the cohort as a stratum variable, which offers an extra flexibility in estimating the transition probabilities. Additionally, both approaches may include possible interaction terms between the cohort and a given prognostic predictor. Furthermore, the Markov property conditional on observed prognostic covariates is assessed using a global score test. Whenever departures from the Markovian assumption are revealed for a given transition, the time of entry into the current state is incorporated as a fixed covariate, yielding a semi-Markov process. The two proposed methods are applied to a three-wave dataset of COVID-19-hospitalized adults in the southern Barcelona metropolitan area (Spain), and the corresponding performance is discussed. While both semi-Markovian approaches are shown to be useful, the preferred one will depend on the focus of the inference. To summarize, the cohort–covariate approach enables an insightful discussion on the behavior of the cohort effects, whereas the stratum–cohort approach provides flexibility to estimate transition-specific underlying risks according to the different cohorts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":"67 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.70051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two Cox-based multistate modeling approaches are compared for modeling a complex multicohort event history process. The first approach incorporates cohort information as a fixed covariate, thereby providing a direct estimation of the cohort-specific effects. The second approach includes the cohort as a stratum variable, which offers an extra flexibility in estimating the transition probabilities. Additionally, both approaches may include possible interaction terms between the cohort and a given prognostic predictor. Furthermore, the Markov property conditional on observed prognostic covariates is assessed using a global score test. Whenever departures from the Markovian assumption are revealed for a given transition, the time of entry into the current state is incorporated as a fixed covariate, yielding a semi-Markov process. The two proposed methods are applied to a three-wave dataset of COVID-19-hospitalized adults in the southern Barcelona metropolitan area (Spain), and the corresponding performance is discussed. While both semi-Markovian approaches are shown to be useful, the preferred one will depend on the focus of the inference. To summarize, the cohort–covariate approach enables an insightful discussion on the behavior of the cohort effects, whereas the stratum–cohort approach provides flexibility to estimate transition-specific underlying risks according to the different cohorts.

多队列事件历史数据的半马尔可夫多状态建模方法
比较了两种基于cox的多状态建模方法对复杂多队列事件历史过程的建模。第一种方法将队列信息作为固定协变量,从而提供对队列特定效应的直接估计。第二种方法将队列作为地层变量,这在估计过渡概率方面提供了额外的灵活性。此外,这两种方法可能包括队列和给定预后预测因子之间可能的相互作用项。此外,马尔可夫性质条件观察到的预后协变量是评估使用全局得分测试。每当偏离马尔可夫假设时,对于给定的过渡,进入当前状态的时间被合并为固定的协变量,产生半马尔可夫过程。将这两种方法应用于西班牙巴塞罗那南部城区新冠肺炎住院成年人的三波数据集,并讨论了相应的性能。虽然两种半马尔可夫方法都被证明是有用的,但首选的方法将取决于推理的焦点。总之,队列协变量方法能够对队列效应的行为进行有见地的讨论,而分层队列方法提供了根据不同队列估计过渡特定潜在风险的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信