Wenjun Fan, Yang Xiao, Baofeng Cao, Shifan Wu, Hao Cui, Jian Chu, Hanlong Liu
{"title":"Effects of biostimulation treatment methods on mechanical properties and microstructure characteristics of biocemented soil","authors":"Wenjun Fan, Yang Xiao, Baofeng Cao, Shifan Wu, Hao Cui, Jian Chu, Hanlong Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02548-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of the current study is to explore the effect of biostimulation treatment methods on the mechanical properties and microstructure characteristics of biocemented soil. Biostimulated microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) is an eco-friendly and economical soil reinforcement measure. It relies on the stimulation of the urease-producing bacteria (UPB) in situ for the MICP process. Different biostimulation treatment methods involve different oxygen availability, stimulation solution content and distribution, and number of biostimulation treatments. There may be differences in the effect of UPB stimulation and biocementation when different biostimulation treatment methods are used. In this study, four biostimulation treatment methods, i.e., unsaturated single biostimulation treatment (USBT), unsaturated multiple biostimulation treatments (UMBT), saturated single biostimulation treatment (SSBT) and saturated–unsaturated-combined single biostimulation treatment (CSBT), were used to stimulate native UPB in soil columns, and then, the same cementation treatment was applied to the soil columns. Subsequently, the mechanical behavior and microstructural properties of the biocemented soil were investigated. The results indicated that the saturated single biostimulation treatment was more conducive to stimulating native UPB to induce CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitation. Samples subjected to the saturated single biostimulation treatment exhibited higher CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitation content (<i>CCP</i>), dry density, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and lower permeability within the same cementation treatment cycle (<i>N</i><sub><i>C</i></sub>). However, UCS was not only determined by <i>CCP</i>, but was also regulated by CaCO<sub>3</sub> spatial distribution and precipitation pattern. This study could help guide the selection of biostimulation treatment methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 5","pages":"2163 - 2184"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02548-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of the current study is to explore the effect of biostimulation treatment methods on the mechanical properties and microstructure characteristics of biocemented soil. Biostimulated microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) is an eco-friendly and economical soil reinforcement measure. It relies on the stimulation of the urease-producing bacteria (UPB) in situ for the MICP process. Different biostimulation treatment methods involve different oxygen availability, stimulation solution content and distribution, and number of biostimulation treatments. There may be differences in the effect of UPB stimulation and biocementation when different biostimulation treatment methods are used. In this study, four biostimulation treatment methods, i.e., unsaturated single biostimulation treatment (USBT), unsaturated multiple biostimulation treatments (UMBT), saturated single biostimulation treatment (SSBT) and saturated–unsaturated-combined single biostimulation treatment (CSBT), were used to stimulate native UPB in soil columns, and then, the same cementation treatment was applied to the soil columns. Subsequently, the mechanical behavior and microstructural properties of the biocemented soil were investigated. The results indicated that the saturated single biostimulation treatment was more conducive to stimulating native UPB to induce CaCO3 precipitation. Samples subjected to the saturated single biostimulation treatment exhibited higher CaCO3 precipitation content (CCP), dry density, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and lower permeability within the same cementation treatment cycle (NC). However, UCS was not only determined by CCP, but was also regulated by CaCO3 spatial distribution and precipitation pattern. This study could help guide the selection of biostimulation treatment methods.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.