Jiale Zhu, Abbas El-Zein, Thomas C. T. Hubble, Guien Miao
{"title":"Effects of soil saturation and suction on root reinforcement performance: pull-out experiments on six native Australian plants","authors":"Jiale Zhu, Abbas El-Zein, Thomas C. T. Hubble, Guien Miao","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02603-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Improving shallow slope stability with vegetation requires an understanding of root reinforcement performance, in addition to consideration of local ecological impacts. Existing root reinforcement models have not accounted for the influence of soil water content, due to insufficient experimental evidence and theoretical understanding. In this study, the root reinforcement behaviour of six Australian native plants (<i>A. costata</i>, <i>B. integrifolia</i>, <i>E. reticulatus</i>, <i>P. incisa</i>, <i>C. citrinus</i> and <i>M. thymifolia</i>) are examined through vertical pull-out tests under various levels of volumetric water content (VWC) and suction. Additionally, this study employed two root reinforcement models to illustrate the impact of VWC on comparing the performance of these models with experimental results. The study also employs an innovative approach by making an analogy to soil nails or piles and normalising pull-out force against the peripheral surface area of root-soil bundles, defining this as pull-out stress. The results show that VWC and suction have a strong influence on reinforcement, with a roughly linear inverse relationship observed between VWC and pull-out force of root bundles recorded for all species. The pull-out stress followed a nonlinear inverse relationship with VWC and suction as the pull-out force. Furthermore, discrepancies between established-model predictions and experimental data widen with increasing VWCs. It is also found that inadequate sampling can also lead to substantial errors in estimating the actual water content of the soil. The study demonstrates that VWC and suction significantly impact root reinforcement performance, with pull-out strength decreasing as VWC increases. The study also highlights the importance of accurately recording soil water content in root reinforcement experiments and modelling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 5","pages":"2075 - 2092"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11440-025-02603-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02603-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Improving shallow slope stability with vegetation requires an understanding of root reinforcement performance, in addition to consideration of local ecological impacts. Existing root reinforcement models have not accounted for the influence of soil water content, due to insufficient experimental evidence and theoretical understanding. In this study, the root reinforcement behaviour of six Australian native plants (A. costata, B. integrifolia, E. reticulatus, P. incisa, C. citrinus and M. thymifolia) are examined through vertical pull-out tests under various levels of volumetric water content (VWC) and suction. Additionally, this study employed two root reinforcement models to illustrate the impact of VWC on comparing the performance of these models with experimental results. The study also employs an innovative approach by making an analogy to soil nails or piles and normalising pull-out force against the peripheral surface area of root-soil bundles, defining this as pull-out stress. The results show that VWC and suction have a strong influence on reinforcement, with a roughly linear inverse relationship observed between VWC and pull-out force of root bundles recorded for all species. The pull-out stress followed a nonlinear inverse relationship with VWC and suction as the pull-out force. Furthermore, discrepancies between established-model predictions and experimental data widen with increasing VWCs. It is also found that inadequate sampling can also lead to substantial errors in estimating the actual water content of the soil. The study demonstrates that VWC and suction significantly impact root reinforcement performance, with pull-out strength decreasing as VWC increases. The study also highlights the importance of accurately recording soil water content in root reinforcement experiments and modelling.
提高有植被的浅层边坡稳定性,除了考虑局部生态影响外,还需要了解根系加固性能。由于实验证据和理论认识不足,现有的根系加固模型没有考虑土壤含水量的影响。在本研究中,通过不同体积含水量(VWC)和吸力水平下的垂直拔拔试验,研究了六种澳大利亚本土植物(A. costata, B. integrifolia, E. reticulatus, P. incisa, C. citrinus和M. thymifolia)的根系加固行为。此外,本研究还采用了两种根强化模型来说明VWC对模型性能的影响,并与实验结果进行了比较。该研究还采用了一种创新的方法,通过类比土钉或桩,并将根-土束周边表面积上的拔出力归一化,将其定义为拔出应力。结果表明:吸水量和吸力对根束加固有较强的影响,各树种根束拔出力与吸水量呈近似线性反比关系;抽拔应力与VWC和吸力呈非线性反比关系。此外,建立的模型预测和实验数据之间的差异随着vwc的增加而扩大。研究还发现,采样不充分也会导致在估计土壤实际含水量时出现重大误差。研究表明,吸水量和吸力对根系加固性能有显著影响,随着吸水量的增加,拔出强度降低。该研究还强调了在根系加固试验和建模中准确记录土壤含水量的重要性。
期刊介绍:
Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.