Comparison of biomineralization kinetics induced by bacteria, bacterial enzyme, and soybean enzyme

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Guoliang Ma, Yang Xiao, Xiang He, Shifan Wu, Jian Chu
{"title":"Comparison of biomineralization kinetics induced by bacteria, bacterial enzyme, and soybean enzyme","authors":"Guoliang Ma,&nbsp;Yang Xiao,&nbsp;Xiang He,&nbsp;Shifan Wu,&nbsp;Jian Chu","doi":"10.1007/s11440-024-02479-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bacteria (BS), bacterial enzymes (BE), and soybean enzymes (SE) have been used to induce CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitation for soil stabilization. While the performance of these three urease sources has been widely studied, the underlying mechanisms have not been thoroughly explored. In this study, we conducted solution tests, followed by mathematical analysis, to investigate bacteria/enzyme degradation, urea hydrolysis rate, and CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitation rate across different reaction phases. Microfluidics tests were also conducted to visually observe the precipitation process. Our results indicated that both urea hydrolysis and CaCO<sub>3</sub> precipitation intensified the degradation of the urease sources. Bacteria exhibited the most stable urease activity, followed by soybean enzymes, and then bacterial enzymes. The microfluidics tests revealed a lag period before CaCO<sub>3</sub> nucleation across all conditions, with the longest duration for BS, followed by SE, and then BE. Bacteria proved to be more effective urease producers, maintaining adequate urease levels without acting as heterogeneous nucleation sites. Additionally, SE contained significant impurities, which may contribute to the higher strength observed in SE-stabilized soil compared to BS-stabilized soil. The current work offers a fundamental approach for practical biocement grouting design through mathematic analysis and provides new insights into biocementation processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 5","pages":"2185 - 2200"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-024-02479-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bacteria (BS), bacterial enzymes (BE), and soybean enzymes (SE) have been used to induce CaCO3 precipitation for soil stabilization. While the performance of these three urease sources has been widely studied, the underlying mechanisms have not been thoroughly explored. In this study, we conducted solution tests, followed by mathematical analysis, to investigate bacteria/enzyme degradation, urea hydrolysis rate, and CaCO3 precipitation rate across different reaction phases. Microfluidics tests were also conducted to visually observe the precipitation process. Our results indicated that both urea hydrolysis and CaCO3 precipitation intensified the degradation of the urease sources. Bacteria exhibited the most stable urease activity, followed by soybean enzymes, and then bacterial enzymes. The microfluidics tests revealed a lag period before CaCO3 nucleation across all conditions, with the longest duration for BS, followed by SE, and then BE. Bacteria proved to be more effective urease producers, maintaining adequate urease levels without acting as heterogeneous nucleation sites. Additionally, SE contained significant impurities, which may contribute to the higher strength observed in SE-stabilized soil compared to BS-stabilized soil. The current work offers a fundamental approach for practical biocement grouting design through mathematic analysis and provides new insights into biocementation processes.

细菌、细菌酶和大豆酶诱导生物矿化动力学的比较
利用细菌(BS)、细菌酶(BE)和大豆酶(SE)诱导CaCO3降水来稳定土壤。虽然这三种脲酶源的性能已被广泛研究,但其潜在的机制尚未被彻底探索。在本研究中,我们进行了溶液测试,然后进行了数学分析,以研究不同反应阶段的细菌/酶降解,尿素水解率和CaCO3沉淀率。通过微流体实验直观地观察了沉淀过程。结果表明,尿素水解和CaCO3沉淀均能促进脲酶源的降解。细菌脲酶活性最稳定,其次是大豆酶,最后是细菌酶。微流体测试显示,在所有条件下,CaCO3成核前都有一个滞后期,BS条件下持续时间最长,其次是SE,然后是BE。细菌被证明是更有效的脲酶生产者,维持足够的脲酶水平而不作为异质成核位点。此外,SE含有大量杂质,这可能是SE稳定土比bs稳定土强度更高的原因。本研究通过数学分析为实际生物胶结注浆设计提供了基本方法,并对生物胶结过程提供了新的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信