E. Devine, M. Lester, T. McElroy, T. Valenzuela, W. LePage
{"title":"Mechanical Characterization of Additive-Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Processed via Bound Metal Deposition","authors":"E. Devine, M. Lester, T. McElroy, T. Valenzuela, W. LePage","doi":"10.1007/s11340-025-01178-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Additive manufacturing (AM) is rapidly growing, with new AM methods continually in development. Alloys processed with novel methods require systematic characterization to understand and validate the materials, especially for demanding fields.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study characterized the mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy manufactured with bound metal deposition (BMD), a form of metal extrusion (MEX) AM.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Specimens made of Ti64 were printed via Desktop Metal’s Studio System 2 through a printing, debinding, and sintering process. The microstructure was analyzed with optical metallography and a newly developed open-source porosity analysis tool. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), optical microscopy, and compositional analysis of green, brown, and sintered parts were conducted to study the material and its failure modes. Sintered specimens were tensile and hardness tested.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>As-sintered specimens exhibited ductility more than 10 times lower than wrought Ti64, partially due to contamination/impurity that formed brittle <span>\\(\\alpha \\)</span>-case titanium. Sources of contamination may have included the sacrificial Al<span>\\(_2\\)</span>O<span>\\(_3\\)</span> interlayer, the wax/polymer binder, and/or impurity introduction from the furnace. Fractography imaging found quasi-cleavage fracture initiating at areas of high surface roughness along the ceramic interlayer surface of the parts and transitioning into dimple rupture and intergranular decohesion.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Elevated contamination levels, high surface roughness, and internal porosity led to low elongation and ultimate strength in the Ti64 BMD alloy. With the processing route presented here, BMD for Ti64 may not be suitable for applications that demand high ductility and strength with minimal impurities, although with process refinement, the method may be promising for certain applications</p></div>","PeriodicalId":552,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Mechanics","volume":"65 4","pages":"573 - 596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11340-025-01178-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Additive manufacturing (AM) is rapidly growing, with new AM methods continually in development. Alloys processed with novel methods require systematic characterization to understand and validate the materials, especially for demanding fields.
Objective
This study characterized the mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy manufactured with bound metal deposition (BMD), a form of metal extrusion (MEX) AM.
Methods
Specimens made of Ti64 were printed via Desktop Metal’s Studio System 2 through a printing, debinding, and sintering process. The microstructure was analyzed with optical metallography and a newly developed open-source porosity analysis tool. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), optical microscopy, and compositional analysis of green, brown, and sintered parts were conducted to study the material and its failure modes. Sintered specimens were tensile and hardness tested.
Results
As-sintered specimens exhibited ductility more than 10 times lower than wrought Ti64, partially due to contamination/impurity that formed brittle \(\alpha \)-case titanium. Sources of contamination may have included the sacrificial Al\(_2\)O\(_3\) interlayer, the wax/polymer binder, and/or impurity introduction from the furnace. Fractography imaging found quasi-cleavage fracture initiating at areas of high surface roughness along the ceramic interlayer surface of the parts and transitioning into dimple rupture and intergranular decohesion.
Conclusions
Elevated contamination levels, high surface roughness, and internal porosity led to low elongation and ultimate strength in the Ti64 BMD alloy. With the processing route presented here, BMD for Ti64 may not be suitable for applications that demand high ductility and strength with minimal impurities, although with process refinement, the method may be promising for certain applications
随着新的增材制造方法的不断发展,增材制造(AM)正在迅速发展。用新方法加工的合金需要系统的表征来理解和验证材料,特别是在要求苛刻的领域。目的研究结合金属沉积法(BMD)制备的Ti-6Al-4V合金的力学性能和失效机理。方法采用Desktop Metal 's Studio System 2对Ti64试样进行打印、脱脂和烧结处理。利用光学金相学和新开发的开源孔隙度分析工具对其微观结构进行了分析。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、光学显微镜以及对绿色、棕色和烧结件的成分分析来研究材料及其失效模式。对烧结试样进行拉伸和硬度测试。结果as -烧结试样的延展性比变形Ti64低10倍以上,部分原因是污染/杂质形成了脆性\(\alpha \) -case钛。污染源可能包括牺牲的Al \(_2\) O \(_3\)中间层、蜡/聚合物粘合剂和/或从炉中引入的杂质。断口成像发现,准解理断裂始于零件沿陶瓷层间表面的高表面粗糙度区域,然后转变为韧窝断裂和晶间脱黏。结论高污染水平、高表面粗糙度和内部孔隙率导致Ti64 BMD合金伸长率和极限强度较低。根据本文提出的工艺路线,Ti64的BMD可能不适合要求高延展性和强度且杂质最少的应用,尽管经过工艺改进,该方法可能对某些应用有希望
期刊介绍:
Experimental Mechanics is the official journal of the Society for Experimental Mechanics that publishes papers in all areas of experimentation including its theoretical and computational analysis. The journal covers research in design and implementation of novel or improved experiments to characterize materials, structures and systems. Articles extending the frontiers of experimental mechanics at large and small scales are particularly welcome.
Coverage extends from research in solid and fluids mechanics to fields at the intersection of disciplines including physics, chemistry and biology. Development of new devices and technologies for metrology applications in a wide range of industrial sectors (e.g., manufacturing, high-performance materials, aerospace, information technology, medicine, energy and environmental technologies) is also covered.