Producing dissolving pulp from agricultural waste

Joanna Wojtasz, Niclas Sjöstedt, Benjamin Storm, Manuel Mammen Parayil, Amanda Ulefors, Linnea Nilsson, Maria Alejandra Hernández Leal, Anne Michud, Åsa Östlund, Tomas Rydberg and Diana Bernin
{"title":"Producing dissolving pulp from agricultural waste","authors":"Joanna Wojtasz, Niclas Sjöstedt, Benjamin Storm, Manuel Mammen Parayil, Amanda Ulefors, Linnea Nilsson, Maria Alejandra Hernández Leal, Anne Michud, Åsa Östlund, Tomas Rydberg and Diana Bernin","doi":"10.1039/D4SU00534A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >A growing population imposes an increased demand on textile fibres based on cellulose. Forecasts predict a cellulose gap due to the lack of cotton and the need to assess other sustainable cellulose resources for dissolving pulp production. Circular cellulose resources might be agricultural wastes. Here we evaluated oat husks, wheat straw, potato pulp and pressed sugar beet pulp which are available in sufficient amounts in Sweden to produce dissolving pulp using the soda pulping process. Initial pulps from oat and wheat were further refined to achieve the purity of the dissolving pulp while potato and sugar beets were discarded due to processing difficulties. High purity dissolving pulps were obtained including both acid prehydrolysis pretreatment, soda cooking and a bleaching sequence. To evaluate the environmental impact of the production of dissolving pulp from oat husks and wheat straw, the process was scaled-up from lab scale to industrial scale and simulated, using Aspen PLUS. The results of the process simulations were evaluated through life-cycle assessment. Processing wheat straw required a higher chemical and energy demand compared to oat, but wheat pulp had a lower environmental impact. Both wheat and oat pulp had a higher impact than wood due to differences in cultivation. Nevertheless, dissolving pulp from wheat and oat might be a sustainable substitute for cotton or dissolving pulp from wood.</p>","PeriodicalId":74745,"journal":{"name":"RSC sustainability","volume":" 5","pages":" 2210-2220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/su/d4su00534a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/su/d4su00534a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing population imposes an increased demand on textile fibres based on cellulose. Forecasts predict a cellulose gap due to the lack of cotton and the need to assess other sustainable cellulose resources for dissolving pulp production. Circular cellulose resources might be agricultural wastes. Here we evaluated oat husks, wheat straw, potato pulp and pressed sugar beet pulp which are available in sufficient amounts in Sweden to produce dissolving pulp using the soda pulping process. Initial pulps from oat and wheat were further refined to achieve the purity of the dissolving pulp while potato and sugar beets were discarded due to processing difficulties. High purity dissolving pulps were obtained including both acid prehydrolysis pretreatment, soda cooking and a bleaching sequence. To evaluate the environmental impact of the production of dissolving pulp from oat husks and wheat straw, the process was scaled-up from lab scale to industrial scale and simulated, using Aspen PLUS. The results of the process simulations were evaluated through life-cycle assessment. Processing wheat straw required a higher chemical and energy demand compared to oat, but wheat pulp had a lower environmental impact. Both wheat and oat pulp had a higher impact than wood due to differences in cultivation. Nevertheless, dissolving pulp from wheat and oat might be a sustainable substitute for cotton or dissolving pulp from wood.

从农业废料中生产可溶解纸浆的
不断增长的人口对以纤维素为基础的纺织纤维的需求增加。由于缺乏棉花和需要评估用于溶解纸浆生产的其他可持续纤维素资源,预测将出现纤维素缺口。循环纤维素资源可能是农业废弃物。在这里,我们评估了燕麦壳,麦秆,马铃薯浆和压榨甜菜浆,这些在瑞典有足够的数量可以使用苏打制浆工艺生产溶解浆。最初的燕麦和小麦浆被进一步精制,以达到溶解浆的纯度,而马铃薯和甜菜由于加工困难而被丢弃。通过酸预水解预处理、碱蒸煮和漂白,获得了高纯度的溶解浆。为了评估从燕麦壳和麦秆中生产溶解纸浆的环境影响,该过程从实验室规模扩大到工业规模,并使用Aspen PLUS进行了模拟。通过生命周期评价对过程模拟结果进行了评价。与燕麦相比,加工麦秸需要更高的化学和能源需求,但小麦纸浆对环境的影响较小。由于栽培方式的差异,小麦和燕麦纸浆的影响均高于木材。然而,小麦和燕麦的溶解纸浆可能是棉花或木材溶解纸浆的可持续替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信