Anticipating public acceptance of anti-terrorism technologies in urban spaces: Insights from Czech Republic, Greece, and Spain

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Arturo Cuesta, Javier González-Villa, Gemma Ortiz, Daniel Alvear
{"title":"Anticipating public acceptance of anti-terrorism technologies in urban spaces: Insights from Czech Republic, Greece, and Spain","authors":"Arturo Cuesta,&nbsp;Javier González-Villa,&nbsp;Gemma Ortiz,&nbsp;Daniel Alvear","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study surveyed citizens (n = 1.501) from the Czech Republic, Greece, and Spain to analyse public acceptance of new technologies for preventing terror attacks in urban areas. Our results reveal that threat perception and privacy concerns impact on pre-existing attitudes toward surveillance technologies. We found that 25 % of participants trusted the proposed technologies while 50 % saw them as effective but invasive. Results also reveal sociodemographic factors that significantly shape acceptance including age, gender, education, political views, and geographical location. Furthermore, the proposed model, which links acceptance to knowledge, perceived effectiveness, intrusiveness, and trust in institutions, was found reliable and valid.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 106888"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753525001134","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study surveyed citizens (n = 1.501) from the Czech Republic, Greece, and Spain to analyse public acceptance of new technologies for preventing terror attacks in urban areas. Our results reveal that threat perception and privacy concerns impact on pre-existing attitudes toward surveillance technologies. We found that 25 % of participants trusted the proposed technologies while 50 % saw them as effective but invasive. Results also reveal sociodemographic factors that significantly shape acceptance including age, gender, education, political views, and geographical location. Furthermore, the proposed model, which links acceptance to knowledge, perceived effectiveness, intrusiveness, and trust in institutions, was found reliable and valid.
预测公众对城市空间反恐技术的接受程度:来自捷克共和国、希腊和西班牙的见解
这项研究调查了来自捷克共和国、希腊和西班牙的公民(n = 1.501),以分析公众对城市地区预防恐怖袭击的新技术的接受程度。我们的研究结果表明,威胁感知和隐私问题影响了对监控技术的预先存在的态度。我们发现,25%的参与者信任拟议的技术,而50%的人认为它们有效但具有侵入性。结果还揭示了显著影响接受度的社会人口因素,包括年龄、性别、教育程度、政治观点和地理位置。此外,所提出的模型将接受度与知识、感知有效性、侵入性和对机构的信任联系起来,被发现是可靠和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信