Burden without benefit: Examining environmental injustices in stone extraction in Buoku, Ghana

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Ata Senior Yeboah , Charles Gyan
{"title":"Burden without benefit: Examining environmental injustices in stone extraction in Buoku, Ghana","authors":"Ata Senior Yeboah ,&nbsp;Charles Gyan","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ghana’s strategy of partnering with multinational and transnational corporations to extract natural resources has often yielded unevenly distributed benefits, while leaving host communities burdened by significant environmental costs. This paper focuses on stone quarrying in Buoku, Ghana, to examine the dimensions of distributive and procedural justice in such extractive contexts. Using qualitative in-depth interviews with eight key community stakeholders, we explored how residents understand, experience, and respond to the unequal allocation of environmental benefits and burdens in the context of quarrying operations in Buoku, Ghana. Our findings indicate that profits and advantages accrue primarily to quarrying firms and external authorities, while the host community bears the brunt of environmental degradation and related social harms. Moreover, meaningful local participation in decision-making is largely absent, reflecting a lack of procedural justice and further entrenching community marginalization. These results highlight the critical need to integrate distributive and procedural justice considerations into environmental policy frameworks. We recommend policies that ensure community members’ active involvement in environment-related decisions, and that directly address their unique needs, perspectives, and values. Such measures can help establish a more equitable distribution of resource benefits, mitigate harms, and contribute to more just and sustainable extractive practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101681"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X2500070X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ghana’s strategy of partnering with multinational and transnational corporations to extract natural resources has often yielded unevenly distributed benefits, while leaving host communities burdened by significant environmental costs. This paper focuses on stone quarrying in Buoku, Ghana, to examine the dimensions of distributive and procedural justice in such extractive contexts. Using qualitative in-depth interviews with eight key community stakeholders, we explored how residents understand, experience, and respond to the unequal allocation of environmental benefits and burdens in the context of quarrying operations in Buoku, Ghana. Our findings indicate that profits and advantages accrue primarily to quarrying firms and external authorities, while the host community bears the brunt of environmental degradation and related social harms. Moreover, meaningful local participation in decision-making is largely absent, reflecting a lack of procedural justice and further entrenching community marginalization. These results highlight the critical need to integrate distributive and procedural justice considerations into environmental policy frameworks. We recommend policies that ensure community members’ active involvement in environment-related decisions, and that directly address their unique needs, perspectives, and values. Such measures can help establish a more equitable distribution of resource benefits, mitigate harms, and contribute to more just and sustainable extractive practices.
没有利益的负担:检查在布库,加纳的石头开采环境不公正
加纳与多国和跨国公司合作开采自然资源的战略往往产生了分配不均的利益,同时使东道社区承担了巨大的环境代价。本文的重点是在布库,加纳采石,检查分配和程序正义的维度在这样的采掘环境。通过对八个主要社区利益相关者的定性深入访谈,我们探讨了加纳布奥库采石作业背景下居民如何理解、体验和应对环境利益和负担的不平等分配。我们的研究结果表明,利润和优势主要由采石公司和外部当局积累,而东道国社区则首当其冲地承担环境退化和相关的社会危害。此外,在很大程度上没有有意义的地方参与决策,反映了程序正义的缺乏和进一步巩固社区边缘化。这些结果突出了将分配和程序正义考虑纳入环境政策框架的迫切需要。我们建议制定政策,确保社区成员积极参与与环境有关的决策,并直接解决他们的独特需求、观点和价值观。这些措施有助于建立更公平的资源利益分配,减轻危害,促进更公正和可持续的采掘做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信