The impact of leukapheresis and chemotherapy on early mortality in adult acute myeloid leukemia with hyperleukocytosis: Single center experience in Indonesia
{"title":"The impact of leukapheresis and chemotherapy on early mortality in adult acute myeloid leukemia with hyperleukocytosis: Single center experience in Indonesia","authors":"Jaka Susila , Ibnu Purwanto , Teguh Triyono , Hans Vrielink , Johan Kurnianda , Kartika Widayati Taroeno-Hariadi , Mardiah Suci Hardianti , Susanna Hilda Hutajulu","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2025.104145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hyperleukocytosis (HL) is associated with high rates of morbidity and early mortality of up to 29 % due to the development of leukostasis, tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The treatment options include chemotherapy, steroids, and leukapheresis. Leukapheresis has a beneficial effect on chemotherapy, but clinical trials showed controversy. We aimed to evaluate the effect of adding leukapheresis to chemotherapy on 30-day survival in AML patients with HL.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study design was as a retrospective cohort study using secondary data from medical records collected between July and August 2024. Inclusion criteria were ages of 18 years and older, diagnosed with AML with a leukocyte count greater than 100,000/mm<sup>3</sup> admitted to our hospital between January 2019 and July 2024, and received chemotherapy with and without leukapheresis. The primary endpoint is a 30-day survival rate since admission to the hospital. The Kaplan–Meier (log-rank) curve method was used for mortality between leukapheresis concomitant with chemotherapy (Group A) and chemotherapy only (Group B). Bivariate analysis is used to analyze correlations between mortality and clinical parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 50 patients with 25 patients in each group. Group A showed a significantly higher leukocyte count (222 vs. 172.000/mm<sup>3</sup> p = 0.031) and a larger proportion of leukostasis (80 % vs. 37.5 %, p = 0.002). The median overall survival in group A was 20 days (95 % confidence interval/CI: 17.178–22.822), while in group B 19 days (95 % CI: 8.394–29.606). By day 30, 72 % of patients in group A had died, compared to 84 % in group B. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test for 30 days of mortality showed an insignificant difference between the two groups with p log-rank: 0.352. In the bivariate analysis, age showed a significant negative correlation with the survival (r: −0.462, p = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In our study, we showed a comparable 30-day survival of AML patients with HL receiving leukapheresis and chemotherapy and those treated with chemotherapy only. It indicated that leukapheresis reversed the poorer survival of group A to a similar level as group B. Older age was the only prognostic factor for unfavorable 30-day survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"64 3","pages":"Article 104145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050225000801","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Hyperleukocytosis (HL) is associated with high rates of morbidity and early mortality of up to 29 % due to the development of leukostasis, tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The treatment options include chemotherapy, steroids, and leukapheresis. Leukapheresis has a beneficial effect on chemotherapy, but clinical trials showed controversy. We aimed to evaluate the effect of adding leukapheresis to chemotherapy on 30-day survival in AML patients with HL.
Methods
The study design was as a retrospective cohort study using secondary data from medical records collected between July and August 2024. Inclusion criteria were ages of 18 years and older, diagnosed with AML with a leukocyte count greater than 100,000/mm3 admitted to our hospital between January 2019 and July 2024, and received chemotherapy with and without leukapheresis. The primary endpoint is a 30-day survival rate since admission to the hospital. The Kaplan–Meier (log-rank) curve method was used for mortality between leukapheresis concomitant with chemotherapy (Group A) and chemotherapy only (Group B). Bivariate analysis is used to analyze correlations between mortality and clinical parameters.
Results
We identified 50 patients with 25 patients in each group. Group A showed a significantly higher leukocyte count (222 vs. 172.000/mm3 p = 0.031) and a larger proportion of leukostasis (80 % vs. 37.5 %, p = 0.002). The median overall survival in group A was 20 days (95 % confidence interval/CI: 17.178–22.822), while in group B 19 days (95 % CI: 8.394–29.606). By day 30, 72 % of patients in group A had died, compared to 84 % in group B. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test for 30 days of mortality showed an insignificant difference between the two groups with p log-rank: 0.352. In the bivariate analysis, age showed a significant negative correlation with the survival (r: −0.462, p = 0.001).
Conclusion
In our study, we showed a comparable 30-day survival of AML patients with HL receiving leukapheresis and chemotherapy and those treated with chemotherapy only. It indicated that leukapheresis reversed the poorer survival of group A to a similar level as group B. Older age was the only prognostic factor for unfavorable 30-day survival.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues.
Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.