French reimbursement of health technologies: assessment is at the heart of the procedure

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cédric Carbonneil , Corinne Collignon , Hubert Galmiche , Andrea Lasserre , Charlotte Masia , Floriane Pelon
{"title":"French reimbursement of health technologies: assessment is at the heart of the procedure","authors":"Cédric Carbonneil ,&nbsp;Corinne Collignon ,&nbsp;Hubert Galmiche ,&nbsp;Andrea Lasserre ,&nbsp;Charlotte Masia ,&nbsp;Floriane Pelon","doi":"10.1016/j.lpm.2025.104279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In France, health technologies can be reimbursed by the national health insurance system. However, not all are eligible, and several steps are required. This article aims at deciphering the various procedures involved.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We first described the most common steps for reimbursement procedures, from authorisation to health technology assessment, including clinical evaluation and reimbursement decision. We then discussed certain specificities related to the nature of the health technologies (for example, vaccines among drugs, or digital medical devices (DMDs) among medical devices), and to the status of the procedure (derogatory vs. standard).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>France benefits from several procedures aimed at reimbursing health products, and their number is increasing over time. They all share one common step, assessment, which is systematically performed from a clinical perspective and sometimes includes an organisational or an economic viewpoint, by a single actor: the French National Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de santé, HAS).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and relevance</h3><div>HAS evaluations are essential tools for informing healthcare decision-making, and ensuring that patients have access to safe, effective, and affordable treatments. The system will have to face new challenges in the coming years: the European regulation will pool certain procedural steps, there will be more self-directed DMDs on the market and new organizations set up to support innovation as well as scarce human and financial resources. Ultimately, it is all about constantly adapting to meet patients' needs, introducing new health technologies that offer added value and limited risks, while making the best possible use of available resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20530,"journal":{"name":"Presse Medicale","volume":"54 2","pages":"Article 104279"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Presse Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0755498225000120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In France, health technologies can be reimbursed by the national health insurance system. However, not all are eligible, and several steps are required. This article aims at deciphering the various procedures involved.

Methods

We first described the most common steps for reimbursement procedures, from authorisation to health technology assessment, including clinical evaluation and reimbursement decision. We then discussed certain specificities related to the nature of the health technologies (for example, vaccines among drugs, or digital medical devices (DMDs) among medical devices), and to the status of the procedure (derogatory vs. standard).

Findings

France benefits from several procedures aimed at reimbursing health products, and their number is increasing over time. They all share one common step, assessment, which is systematically performed from a clinical perspective and sometimes includes an organisational or an economic viewpoint, by a single actor: the French National Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de santé, HAS).

Conclusion and relevance

HAS evaluations are essential tools for informing healthcare decision-making, and ensuring that patients have access to safe, effective, and affordable treatments. The system will have to face new challenges in the coming years: the European regulation will pool certain procedural steps, there will be more self-directed DMDs on the market and new organizations set up to support innovation as well as scarce human and financial resources. Ultimately, it is all about constantly adapting to meet patients' needs, introducing new health technologies that offer added value and limited risks, while making the best possible use of available resources.
法国对保健技术的报销:评估是这一程序的核心
背景在法国,医疗技术可以由国家医疗保险系统报销。然而,并不是所有的都符合条件,需要几个步骤。本文旨在解读所涉及的各种程序。方法我们首先描述了报销程序中最常见的步骤,从授权到卫生技术评估,包括临床评估和报销决策。然后,我们讨论了与卫生技术的性质(例如,药物中的疫苗,或医疗设备中的数字医疗设备(dmd))以及程序状态(贬损与标准)相关的某些特殊性。调查结果:法国受益于几项旨在报销医疗产品的程序,而且这些程序的数量正随着时间的推移而增加。它们都有一个共同的步骤,即评估,这是从临床角度系统地进行的,有时包括组织或经济观点,由一个行动者:法国国家卫生管理局(Haute autorit de sant, HAS)。结论和相关has评估是告知医疗保健决策的重要工具,并确保患者获得安全、有效和负担得起的治疗。该系统将在未来几年面临新的挑战:欧洲法规将汇集某些程序步骤,市场上将出现更多自主的dmd,建立新的组织来支持创新以及稀缺的人力和财政资源。最终,这一切都是为了不断适应以满足患者的需求,引入提供附加值和风险有限的新卫生技术,同时尽可能充分利用现有资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Presse Medicale
Presse Medicale 医学-医学:内科
自引率
3.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Seule revue médicale "généraliste" de haut niveau, La Presse Médicale est l''équivalent francophone des grandes revues anglosaxonnes de publication et de formation continue. A raison d''un numéro par mois, La Presse Médicale vous offre une double approche éditoriale : - des publications originales (articles originaux, revues systématiques, cas cliniques) soumises à double expertise, portant sur les avancées médicales les plus récentes ; - une partie orientée vers la FMC, vous propose une mise à jour permanente et de haut niveau de vos connaissances, sous forme de dossiers thématiques et de mises au point dans les principales spécialités médicales, pour vous aider à optimiser votre formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信