Grant G. Schultz , Tomas Barriga Aristizabal , Jace Ritchie , Richard L. Warr
{"title":"Prioritizing safety funding using severity weighted risk scores","authors":"Grant G. Schultz , Tomas Barriga Aristizabal , Jace Ritchie , Richard L. Warr","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Limited funding availability requires government agencies to focus transportation funding on locations most in need of safety improvements. The Two-Output Model for Safety (TOMS) was created to prioritize segments and intersections for safety analysis. The TOMS compiles input data, prepares the data files so that the format and content are consistent, and then two different processes occur. The first is to segment roadways based on five variables: average annual daily traffic, functional class, lanes, speed limit, and urban code. The second is to assign the physical characteristics of the roadway to each individual intersection. TOMS outputs a segment file and an intersection file used for statistical analysis and are the “two outputs” referenced by the name of the model. The segments and intersections are analyzed using severity and total number of crashes at the sites. An excess weighted risk score was developed using an equivalent property damage only value to analyze the severity and number of crashes concurrently. The segments and intersections with the highest excess weighted risk scores are prioritized as locations for safety funding. A report compiler is then executed to create two-page safety reports that contain roadway and crash information organized in a manner that allows governing agencies to identify how many crashes are occurring at a site and the manner of collision for the crashes. The research presented in this paper shows that the simultaneous use of intersection and segment analysis combined with excess weighted risk scores can provide insight into the prioritization of safety funding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 108083"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525001691","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Limited funding availability requires government agencies to focus transportation funding on locations most in need of safety improvements. The Two-Output Model for Safety (TOMS) was created to prioritize segments and intersections for safety analysis. The TOMS compiles input data, prepares the data files so that the format and content are consistent, and then two different processes occur. The first is to segment roadways based on five variables: average annual daily traffic, functional class, lanes, speed limit, and urban code. The second is to assign the physical characteristics of the roadway to each individual intersection. TOMS outputs a segment file and an intersection file used for statistical analysis and are the “two outputs” referenced by the name of the model. The segments and intersections are analyzed using severity and total number of crashes at the sites. An excess weighted risk score was developed using an equivalent property damage only value to analyze the severity and number of crashes concurrently. The segments and intersections with the highest excess weighted risk scores are prioritized as locations for safety funding. A report compiler is then executed to create two-page safety reports that contain roadway and crash information organized in a manner that allows governing agencies to identify how many crashes are occurring at a site and the manner of collision for the crashes. The research presented in this paper shows that the simultaneous use of intersection and segment analysis combined with excess weighted risk scores can provide insight into the prioritization of safety funding.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.