Economic and environmental dynamics of tea production through material flow cost accounting (MFCA)

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Majid Dekamin , Ashkan Nabavi-Pelesaraei , Hosein Rezaei
{"title":"Economic and environmental dynamics of tea production through material flow cost accounting (MFCA)","authors":"Majid Dekamin ,&nbsp;Ashkan Nabavi-Pelesaraei ,&nbsp;Hosein Rezaei","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2025.100971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The focus of the investigation is on the analysis of tea production in Iran by utilizing the Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) technique, with the aim of determining the costs of both the economic and environmental aspects. The main driving principle of this study is to establish the true costs of the entire tea production process. The MFCA method provides a thorough material flow analysis to identify hidden costs associated with tea cultivation. It was found that the overall production expenditures involved, including human labor, agricultural machinery, fertilizers, pesticides, and fuel, stood at $6726.5 ha<sup>-1</sup> while the gross value of production was $5606.8 ha<sup>-1</sup>. The negative gross return is primarily attributed to environmental costs, including emissions of toxic gases from fertilizers (ammonia and nitrous oxide), water and soil pollution caused by pesticide use, and a yield loss of 631.5 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>. Among these, yield loss is identified as the most significant factor reducing profitability, although it is often overlooked in traditional cost accounting (TCA) models. In comparison to TCA, the MFCA approach — by incorporating environmental costs — demonstrates a more favorable benefit-cost ratio, indicating better financial performance when sustainability factors are considered. The research consequently asserts that in order to promote not only the economic viability but also the environmental sustainability of tea production, some production processes should be reformed and government policies updated. The restructuring should concentrate on the new machinery use, improvement in agricultural methods, as well as the adoption of policies which are focused on decreasing the environment costs and waste, all of these will lower the result of the tea farming industry in the area from the long-term point of view.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100971"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790825000941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus of the investigation is on the analysis of tea production in Iran by utilizing the Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) technique, with the aim of determining the costs of both the economic and environmental aspects. The main driving principle of this study is to establish the true costs of the entire tea production process. The MFCA method provides a thorough material flow analysis to identify hidden costs associated with tea cultivation. It was found that the overall production expenditures involved, including human labor, agricultural machinery, fertilizers, pesticides, and fuel, stood at $6726.5 ha-1 while the gross value of production was $5606.8 ha-1. The negative gross return is primarily attributed to environmental costs, including emissions of toxic gases from fertilizers (ammonia and nitrous oxide), water and soil pollution caused by pesticide use, and a yield loss of 631.5 kg ha−1. Among these, yield loss is identified as the most significant factor reducing profitability, although it is often overlooked in traditional cost accounting (TCA) models. In comparison to TCA, the MFCA approach — by incorporating environmental costs — demonstrates a more favorable benefit-cost ratio, indicating better financial performance when sustainability factors are considered. The research consequently asserts that in order to promote not only the economic viability but also the environmental sustainability of tea production, some production processes should be reformed and government policies updated. The restructuring should concentrate on the new machinery use, improvement in agricultural methods, as well as the adoption of policies which are focused on decreasing the environment costs and waste, all of these will lower the result of the tea farming industry in the area from the long-term point of view.

Abstract Image

通过物料流成本会计(MFCA)分析茶叶生产的经济和环境动态
调查的重点是利用物料流动成本会计(MFCA)技术分析伊朗的茶叶生产,目的是确定经济和环境方面的成本。本研究的主要驱动原则是建立整个茶叶生产过程的真实成本。MFCA方法提供了一个彻底的物质流分析,以确定与茶叶种植相关的隐性成本。调查发现,包括人力、农业机械、化肥、杀虫剂和燃料在内的全部生产支出为6726.5公顷-1美元,而生产总值为5606.8公顷-1美元。总收益为负的主要原因是环境成本,包括化肥(氨和一氧化二氮)排放的有毒气体、使用农药造成的水和土壤污染以及631.5公斤公顷- 1的产量损失。其中,产量损失被认为是降低盈利能力的最重要因素,尽管它在传统的成本会计(TCA)模型中经常被忽视。与TCA相比,MFCA方法-通过纳入环境成本-显示出更有利的效益成本比,表明在考虑可持续性因素时财务绩效更好。因此,为了促进茶叶生产的经济可行性和环境可持续性,应该改革一些生产过程和更新政府政策。结构调整应集中在新机械的使用,农业方法的改进,以及采取以减少环境成本和浪费为重点的政策,从长远来看,这些都将降低该地区茶业的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信