The Effects of Explainability and User Control on Algorithmic Transparency: The Moderating Role of Algorithmic Literacy.

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Jang Ho Moon,Seheon Kim,Youngju Jung,Jaeyeon Bang,Yongjun Sung
{"title":"The Effects of Explainability and User Control on Algorithmic Transparency: The Moderating Role of Algorithmic Literacy.","authors":"Jang Ho Moon,Seheon Kim,Youngju Jung,Jaeyeon Bang,Yongjun Sung","doi":"10.1089/cyber.2024.0525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As algorithms increasingly shape user experiences on digital platforms, concerns have emerged regarding their opacity and potential negative consequences. In response, platforms have introduced transparency features such as algorithm-based recommendation explanations and user control features. However, empirical research on the effects of these approaches and how they vary according to user characteristics remains limited. This study explores the impact of algorithmic explainability and user control on perceptions of algorithmic transparency, legitimacy, and platform satisfaction in short-form video platforms, focusing on how users' algorithmic literacy moderates these relationships. A 2 (explainability: present vs. absent) × 2 (user control: present vs. absent) × 2 (algorithmic literacy: high vs. low) between-subjects experiment was conducted with 240 participants using a fictitious short-form video platform. The results revealed a significant three-way interaction across all the dependent variables. Both explainability and user control enhanced perceived algorithmic transparency, legitimacy, and satisfaction. When neither feature was present, algorithmic literacy had no significant impact. However, when at least one feature was present, literacy significantly influenced the dependent variables. These findings highlight the critical role of algorithmic literacy in moderating transparency mechanisms' effects. This study advances the understanding of how platform-initiated transparency shapes user perceptions, suggesting that literacy creates a new dimension of the digital divide, where transparency benefits are unequally experienced. Implications for platform developers and policymakers are discussed.","PeriodicalId":10872,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2024.0525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As algorithms increasingly shape user experiences on digital platforms, concerns have emerged regarding their opacity and potential negative consequences. In response, platforms have introduced transparency features such as algorithm-based recommendation explanations and user control features. However, empirical research on the effects of these approaches and how they vary according to user characteristics remains limited. This study explores the impact of algorithmic explainability and user control on perceptions of algorithmic transparency, legitimacy, and platform satisfaction in short-form video platforms, focusing on how users' algorithmic literacy moderates these relationships. A 2 (explainability: present vs. absent) × 2 (user control: present vs. absent) × 2 (algorithmic literacy: high vs. low) between-subjects experiment was conducted with 240 participants using a fictitious short-form video platform. The results revealed a significant three-way interaction across all the dependent variables. Both explainability and user control enhanced perceived algorithmic transparency, legitimacy, and satisfaction. When neither feature was present, algorithmic literacy had no significant impact. However, when at least one feature was present, literacy significantly influenced the dependent variables. These findings highlight the critical role of algorithmic literacy in moderating transparency mechanisms' effects. This study advances the understanding of how platform-initiated transparency shapes user perceptions, suggesting that literacy creates a new dimension of the digital divide, where transparency benefits are unequally experienced. Implications for platform developers and policymakers are discussed.
可解释性和用户控制对算法透明度的影响:算法素养的调节作用。
随着算法越来越多地影响数字平台上的用户体验,人们开始担心算法的不透明性和潜在的负面影响。作为回应,平台引入了基于算法的推荐解释和用户控制功能等透明功能。然而,关于这些方法的效果以及它们如何根据用户特征而变化的实证研究仍然有限。本研究探讨了算法可解释性和用户控制对短视频平台中算法透明度、合法性和平台满意度的影响,重点关注用户的算法素养如何调节这些关系。使用虚拟短视频平台对240名参与者进行了2(可解释性:出席vs缺席)x2(用户控制:出席vs缺席)x2(算法素养:高vs低)的受试者间实验。结果显示,在所有因变量之间存在显著的三方相互作用。可解释性和用户控制都增强了感知算法的透明度、合法性和满意度。当这两个特征都不存在时,算法素养没有显著影响。然而,当至少有一个特征存在时,读写能力显著影响因变量。这些发现强调了算法素养在调节透明度机制影响中的关键作用。这项研究促进了对平台发起的透明度如何塑造用户感知的理解,表明读写能力创造了一个新的数字鸿沟维度,在这个维度上,透明度的好处是不平等的。讨论了对平台开发者和决策者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a leading peer-reviewed journal that is recognized for its authoritative research on the social, behavioral, and psychological impacts of contemporary social networking practices. The journal covers a wide range of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, internet gaming, and e-commerce, and examines how these digital environments shape human interaction and societal norms. For over two decades, this journal has been a pioneering voice in the exploration of social networking and virtual reality, establishing itself as an indispensable resource for professionals and academics in the field. It is particularly celebrated for its swift dissemination of findings through rapid communication articles, alongside comprehensive, in-depth studies that delve into the multifaceted effects of interactive technologies on both individual behavior and broader societal trends. The journal's scope encompasses the full spectrum of impacts—highlighting not only the potential benefits but also the challenges that arise as a result of these technologies. By providing a platform for rigorous research and critical discussions, it fosters a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信