Jens Mazei,Cort W Rudolph,Hannes Zacher,Joachim Hüffmeier
{"title":"Do not put all of your eggs in one basket: Multiverse analysis in applied psychology.","authors":"Jens Mazei,Cort W Rudolph,Hannes Zacher,Joachim Hüffmeier","doi":"10.1037/apl0001291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A multiverse analysis allows researchers to systematically evaluate the support for a hypothesis across a range of sensible ways in which data can be prepared for statistical analysis and/or be analyzed. Accordingly, multiverse analysis provides insights into the relevance of different approaches to, for instance, dealing with outliers or attrition, creating scales, or using different measures for the same construct. The goal of this article is to illustrate the usefulness of multiverse analysis for research in applied psychology and to guide researchers in conducting a multiverse analysis. To do so, we provide a detailed process model of the typical stages involved in conducting a multiverse analysis (along with a shortened version depicting multiverse analysis \"at a glance\"), as well as a designated, corresponding preregistration template for multiverse analysis. To showcase the merits of a multiverse analysis, we also evaluate two exemplary hypotheses regarding employees' experience of commuting to and from work. We observed that the results of these hypothesis tests varied strongly depending on how common decisions were made. As such, multiverse analysis represents an important tool for exploring the robustness of knowledge at the level of individual studies, even before a replication is conducted. Hence, multiverse analysis can strengthen the transparency and openness of empirical work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Psychology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A multiverse analysis allows researchers to systematically evaluate the support for a hypothesis across a range of sensible ways in which data can be prepared for statistical analysis and/or be analyzed. Accordingly, multiverse analysis provides insights into the relevance of different approaches to, for instance, dealing with outliers or attrition, creating scales, or using different measures for the same construct. The goal of this article is to illustrate the usefulness of multiverse analysis for research in applied psychology and to guide researchers in conducting a multiverse analysis. To do so, we provide a detailed process model of the typical stages involved in conducting a multiverse analysis (along with a shortened version depicting multiverse analysis "at a glance"), as well as a designated, corresponding preregistration template for multiverse analysis. To showcase the merits of a multiverse analysis, we also evaluate two exemplary hypotheses regarding employees' experience of commuting to and from work. We observed that the results of these hypothesis tests varied strongly depending on how common decisions were made. As such, multiverse analysis represents an important tool for exploring the robustness of knowledge at the level of individual studies, even before a replication is conducted. Hence, multiverse analysis can strengthen the transparency and openness of empirical work. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Psychology® focuses on publishing original investigations that contribute new knowledge and understanding to fields of applied psychology (excluding clinical and applied experimental or human factors, which are better suited for other APA journals). The journal primarily considers empirical and theoretical investigations that enhance understanding of cognitive, motivational, affective, and behavioral psychological phenomena in work and organizational settings. These phenomena can occur at individual, group, organizational, or cultural levels, and in various work settings such as business, education, training, health, service, government, or military institutions. The journal welcomes submissions from both public and private sector organizations, for-profit or nonprofit. It publishes several types of articles, including:
1.Rigorously conducted empirical investigations that expand conceptual understanding (original investigations or meta-analyses).
2.Theory development articles and integrative conceptual reviews that synthesize literature and generate new theories on psychological phenomena to stimulate novel research.
3.Rigorously conducted qualitative research on phenomena that are challenging to capture with quantitative methods or require inductive theory building.