Sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in neonates and infants <2 years old: results from a phase IV randomized clinical trial.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Edith Mensah-Osman,Yuki Mukai,Aobo Wang,Maria Matuszczak,Vera Saldien,Heather Leibensperger,Marcel Speek,Amy Locco,Rebecca Wrishko,Angela Gee,W Joseph Herring
{"title":"Sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in neonates and infants <2 years old: results from a phase IV randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Edith Mensah-Osman,Yuki Mukai,Aobo Wang,Maria Matuszczak,Vera Saldien,Heather Leibensperger,Marcel Speek,Amy Locco,Rebecca Wrishko,Angela Gee,W Joseph Herring","doi":"10.1097/aln.0000000000005535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nSugammadex is well-tolerated and effective for reversing neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in adults and children ≥2 years old. There is little information on its use in younger children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sugammadex in children under 2 years of age.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nPhase IV, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, clinical trial of sugammadex in participants aged birth to <2 years. Part A was open-label and included pharmacokinetic assessments to determine whether sugammadex dose-adjustment for Part B was necessary based on age. Part B was double-blind and evaluated sugammadex 2 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg. Participants were randomized to: 1) moderate NMB and reversal with 2 mg/kg sugammadex, or 2) moderate NMB and reversal with neostigmine + glycopyrrolate or atropine (hereafter, called neostigmine), or 3) deep NMB and reversal with 4 mg/kg sugammadex. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to neuromuscular recovery (TTNMR). The primary efficacy hypothesis was that sugammadex 2mg/kg would be superior to neostigmine for the reversal of moderate NMB as measured by TTNMR in Part B.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n138 participants aged 1 to 720 days were treated in Parts A+B (sugammadex 2mg/kg n=44, sugammadex 4 mg/kg n=63, neostigmine n=31). Based on pharmacokinetic assessments in Part A, no dose-adjustments for age were needed. In Part B, TTNMR for reversal of moderate NMB was faster with sugammadex 2 mg/kg than neostigmine (median of 1.4 minutes vs 4.4 minutes, hazard ratio = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.37, 4.18; p=0.0002). Sugammadex 4 mg/kg achieved rapid TTNMR for reversal of deep NMB with a median of 1.1 minutes (Parts A+B). The percentage of participants with ≥1 adverse event (Parts A+B) was similar for sugammadex and neostigmine. No deaths, drug-related serious adverse events, or hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis events were reported.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn children <2 years old, sugammadex 2 mg/kg reversed moderate NMB faster than neostigmine, and sugammadex 4 mg/kg rapidly reversed deep NMB. Sugammadex 2 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg were well-tolerated.","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005535","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Sugammadex is well-tolerated and effective for reversing neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in adults and children ≥2 years old. There is little information on its use in younger children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sugammadex in children under 2 years of age. METHODS Phase IV, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, clinical trial of sugammadex in participants aged birth to <2 years. Part A was open-label and included pharmacokinetic assessments to determine whether sugammadex dose-adjustment for Part B was necessary based on age. Part B was double-blind and evaluated sugammadex 2 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg. Participants were randomized to: 1) moderate NMB and reversal with 2 mg/kg sugammadex, or 2) moderate NMB and reversal with neostigmine + glycopyrrolate or atropine (hereafter, called neostigmine), or 3) deep NMB and reversal with 4 mg/kg sugammadex. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to neuromuscular recovery (TTNMR). The primary efficacy hypothesis was that sugammadex 2mg/kg would be superior to neostigmine for the reversal of moderate NMB as measured by TTNMR in Part B. RESULTS 138 participants aged 1 to 720 days were treated in Parts A+B (sugammadex 2mg/kg n=44, sugammadex 4 mg/kg n=63, neostigmine n=31). Based on pharmacokinetic assessments in Part A, no dose-adjustments for age were needed. In Part B, TTNMR for reversal of moderate NMB was faster with sugammadex 2 mg/kg than neostigmine (median of 1.4 minutes vs 4.4 minutes, hazard ratio = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.37, 4.18; p=0.0002). Sugammadex 4 mg/kg achieved rapid TTNMR for reversal of deep NMB with a median of 1.1 minutes (Parts A+B). The percentage of participants with ≥1 adverse event (Parts A+B) was similar for sugammadex and neostigmine. No deaths, drug-related serious adverse events, or hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis events were reported. CONCLUSIONS In children <2 years old, sugammadex 2 mg/kg reversed moderate NMB faster than neostigmine, and sugammadex 4 mg/kg rapidly reversed deep NMB. Sugammadex 2 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg were well-tolerated.
Sugammadex用于逆转新生儿和2岁以下婴儿的神经肌肉阻断:一项IV期随机临床试验的结果
背景:sugammadex对成人和≥2岁儿童的神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)具有良好的耐受性和有效性。关于它在幼儿中的使用信息很少。本研究的目的是评估糖madex在2岁以下儿童中的疗效和耐受性。方法在出生至<2岁的受试者中进行糖玛德的IV期随机、平行组、多中心临床试验。A部分是开放标签的,包括药代动力学评估,以确定是否有必要根据年龄调整B部分的糖madex剂量。B组采用双盲试验,分别对糖madex 2 mg/kg和4 mg/kg进行评价。参与者被随机分为:1)中度NMB和2mg /kg sugammadex逆转,或2)中度NMB和新斯的明+甘炔罗酸盐或阿托品(以下称为新斯的明)逆转,或3)深度NMB和4mg /kg sugammadex逆转。主要疗效终点为神经肌肉恢复时间(TTNMR)。B部分中TTNMR测量的主要疗效假设是,在逆转中度NMB方面,2mg/kg的糖玛德明优于新斯的明。结果138名1至720天的参与者在A+B部分接受治疗(糖玛德明2mg/kg n=44,糖玛德明4mg /kg n=63,新斯的明n=31)。根据A部分的药代动力学评估,不需要对年龄进行剂量调整。在B部分中,糖madex 2 mg/kg治疗中度NMB逆转的TTNMR比新斯的明更快(中位数为1.4分钟vs 4.4分钟,风险比= 2.40,95% CI: 1.37, 4.18;p = 0.0002)。Sugammadex 4mg /kg实现了深部NMB逆转的快速TTNMR,中位时间为1.1分钟(part a +B)。≥1个不良事件(A+B部分)的参与者百分比对于糖马德和新斯的明是相似的。无死亡、药物相关严重不良事件、超敏反应或过敏反应事件报告。结论在<2岁儿童中,糖马酮2 mg/kg逆转中度NMB的速度快于新斯的明,糖马酮4 mg/kg逆转深度NMB的速度快。糖胺酮2 mg/kg和4 mg/kg耐受良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信