Quantitative evaluation of trabecular meshwork in normal tension glaucoma using trabecular meshwork analyzing software.

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Teruhiko Hamanaka,Tetsuro Sakurai,Takuji Kato,Nobuo Ishida,Toshinari Funaki
{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of trabecular meshwork in normal tension glaucoma using trabecular meshwork analyzing software.","authors":"Teruhiko Hamanaka,Tetsuro Sakurai,Takuji Kato,Nobuo Ishida,Toshinari Funaki","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.03.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThis study aimed to investigate histological changes of trabecular meshwork (TM) in normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and determine whether trabeculectomy (TRAB) specimens from NTG patients can serve as normal controls for analyzing other types of high-tension glaucoma using TM analysis software (TMAS) based on light microscopy (LM).\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nProspective comparative case series METHODS: TRAB specimens from 23 NTG patients (65.4±9.2 years-old), including associated clinical data, as well as 12 autopsy eyes (66±11.2 years-old, P=0.8637), were retrospectively analyzed. LM images of TRAB specimens were captured, and TM spaces, TM cellularity, and pigment granules (PG) accumulation in TM were evaluated using TMAS. TMAS1 assessed regional variations in the juxtacanalicular tissue (JCT), corneoscleral meshwork (CSM), and uveal meshwork (UVM) by dividing these regions into anterior, middle, and posterior segments, while TMAS2 measured the total areas of JCT, CSM, and UVM.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nIntraocular pressure, outflow facility, axial length, periods of topical glaucoma medication, spaces in juxtacanalicular tissue, corneoscleral and uveal meshwork, trabecular meshwork cellularity, pigment granule accumulation RESULTS: NTG patients exhibited features such as myopia (-5.5±4.7 D), long axial length (26±2.5 mm), advanced stage of visual field defect (Aulhorn-Greve classification: stage 4.6±0.9), prolonged use of topical-glaucoma medications (13.0±5.0 Y), and subnormal outflow facility (0.24±0.09 µl/min/mmHg). TM spaces measurements showed no notable differences between TMAS1 and TMAS2 in NTG eyes. However, TMAS2 detected a significantly greater reduction in TM spaces (JCT: P=0.000, CSM: P=0.000) and a lower TM cell count (JCT: P=0.0285, UVM: P=0.0006) in NTG specimens compared to autopsy eyes.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nNTG should not be regarded as a normal variant, as structural abnormalities are present despite normal intraocular pressure. These abnormalities may arise from subtle irregularities in the TM, which may be less pronounced than those in high-tension primary open-angle glaucoma, prolonged use of topical glaucoma medications, or other contributing factors such as increased axial length. TMAS2 has proven to be a useful instrument for assessing not only NTG but also a potential means of identifying different types of high-tension glaucoma through the analysis of TRAB specimens.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.03.049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate histological changes of trabecular meshwork (TM) in normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and determine whether trabeculectomy (TRAB) specimens from NTG patients can serve as normal controls for analyzing other types of high-tension glaucoma using TM analysis software (TMAS) based on light microscopy (LM). DESIGN Prospective comparative case series METHODS: TRAB specimens from 23 NTG patients (65.4±9.2 years-old), including associated clinical data, as well as 12 autopsy eyes (66±11.2 years-old, P=0.8637), were retrospectively analyzed. LM images of TRAB specimens were captured, and TM spaces, TM cellularity, and pigment granules (PG) accumulation in TM were evaluated using TMAS. TMAS1 assessed regional variations in the juxtacanalicular tissue (JCT), corneoscleral meshwork (CSM), and uveal meshwork (UVM) by dividing these regions into anterior, middle, and posterior segments, while TMAS2 measured the total areas of JCT, CSM, and UVM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Intraocular pressure, outflow facility, axial length, periods of topical glaucoma medication, spaces in juxtacanalicular tissue, corneoscleral and uveal meshwork, trabecular meshwork cellularity, pigment granule accumulation RESULTS: NTG patients exhibited features such as myopia (-5.5±4.7 D), long axial length (26±2.5 mm), advanced stage of visual field defect (Aulhorn-Greve classification: stage 4.6±0.9), prolonged use of topical-glaucoma medications (13.0±5.0 Y), and subnormal outflow facility (0.24±0.09 µl/min/mmHg). TM spaces measurements showed no notable differences between TMAS1 and TMAS2 in NTG eyes. However, TMAS2 detected a significantly greater reduction in TM spaces (JCT: P=0.000, CSM: P=0.000) and a lower TM cell count (JCT: P=0.0285, UVM: P=0.0006) in NTG specimens compared to autopsy eyes. CONCLUSION NTG should not be regarded as a normal variant, as structural abnormalities are present despite normal intraocular pressure. These abnormalities may arise from subtle irregularities in the TM, which may be less pronounced than those in high-tension primary open-angle glaucoma, prolonged use of topical glaucoma medications, or other contributing factors such as increased axial length. TMAS2 has proven to be a useful instrument for assessing not only NTG but also a potential means of identifying different types of high-tension glaucoma through the analysis of TRAB specimens.
应用小梁网分析软件定量评价正常张力性青光眼小梁网。
目的研究正常张力性青光眼(NTG)患者小梁网(TM)的组织学变化,探讨NTG患者小梁切除术(TRAB)标本是否可以作为正常对照,应用基于光镜(LM)的TM分析软件(TMAS)分析其他类型的高张力性青光眼。方法:回顾性分析23例NTG患者(65.4±9.2岁)的TRAB标本,包括相关临床资料,以及12只尸检眼(66±11.2岁,P=0.8637)。捕获TRAB标本的LM图像,并使用TMAS评估TM空间,TM细胞结构和色素颗粒(PG)在TM中的积累。TMAS1通过将关节旁组织(JCT)、角膜巩膜网(CSM)和葡萄膜网(UVM)划分为前、中、后节段来评估这些区域的差异,而TMAS2测量JCT、CSM和UVM的总面积。主要观察指标眼压、流出设施、眼轴长度、局部青光眼用药时间、眼管旁组织间隙、角膜巩膜网、小梁网细胞结构、色素颗粒堆积等。结果:NTG患者表现为近视(-5.5±4.7 D)、眼轴长(26±2.5 mm)、视野缺损晚期(Aulhorn-Greve分级:4.6±0.9期),长期使用局部青光眼药物(13.0±5.0 Y),流出液设施低于正常水平(0.24±0.09µl/min/mmHg)。NTG眼的TMAS1和TMAS2空间测量结果无显著差异。然而,与尸检眼睛相比,TMAS2检测到NTG标本中TM间隙的显著减少(JCT: P=0.000, CSM: P=0.000)和TM细胞计数的降低(JCT: P=0.0285, UVM: P=0.0006)。结论ntg不应被视为正常变异,尽管眼压正常,但仍存在结构异常。这些异常可能是由于TM的细微不规则引起的,与高张力原发性开角型青光眼、长期使用局部青光眼药物或其他因素(如眼轴长度增加)相比,这些异常可能不那么明显。TMAS2已被证明不仅是评估NTG的有用工具,而且是通过分析TRAB标本识别不同类型高张力性青光眼的潜在手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信