{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of trabecular meshwork in normal tension glaucoma using trabecular meshwork analyzing software.","authors":"Teruhiko Hamanaka,Tetsuro Sakurai,Takuji Kato,Nobuo Ishida,Toshinari Funaki","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.03.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThis study aimed to investigate histological changes of trabecular meshwork (TM) in normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and determine whether trabeculectomy (TRAB) specimens from NTG patients can serve as normal controls for analyzing other types of high-tension glaucoma using TM analysis software (TMAS) based on light microscopy (LM).\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nProspective comparative case series METHODS: TRAB specimens from 23 NTG patients (65.4±9.2 years-old), including associated clinical data, as well as 12 autopsy eyes (66±11.2 years-old, P=0.8637), were retrospectively analyzed. LM images of TRAB specimens were captured, and TM spaces, TM cellularity, and pigment granules (PG) accumulation in TM were evaluated using TMAS. TMAS1 assessed regional variations in the juxtacanalicular tissue (JCT), corneoscleral meshwork (CSM), and uveal meshwork (UVM) by dividing these regions into anterior, middle, and posterior segments, while TMAS2 measured the total areas of JCT, CSM, and UVM.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nIntraocular pressure, outflow facility, axial length, periods of topical glaucoma medication, spaces in juxtacanalicular tissue, corneoscleral and uveal meshwork, trabecular meshwork cellularity, pigment granule accumulation RESULTS: NTG patients exhibited features such as myopia (-5.5±4.7 D), long axial length (26±2.5 mm), advanced stage of visual field defect (Aulhorn-Greve classification: stage 4.6±0.9), prolonged use of topical-glaucoma medications (13.0±5.0 Y), and subnormal outflow facility (0.24±0.09 µl/min/mmHg). TM spaces measurements showed no notable differences between TMAS1 and TMAS2 in NTG eyes. However, TMAS2 detected a significantly greater reduction in TM spaces (JCT: P=0.000, CSM: P=0.000) and a lower TM cell count (JCT: P=0.0285, UVM: P=0.0006) in NTG specimens compared to autopsy eyes.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nNTG should not be regarded as a normal variant, as structural abnormalities are present despite normal intraocular pressure. These abnormalities may arise from subtle irregularities in the TM, which may be less pronounced than those in high-tension primary open-angle glaucoma, prolonged use of topical glaucoma medications, or other contributing factors such as increased axial length. TMAS2 has proven to be a useful instrument for assessing not only NTG but also a potential means of identifying different types of high-tension glaucoma through the analysis of TRAB specimens.","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.03.049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PURPOSE
This study aimed to investigate histological changes of trabecular meshwork (TM) in normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and determine whether trabeculectomy (TRAB) specimens from NTG patients can serve as normal controls for analyzing other types of high-tension glaucoma using TM analysis software (TMAS) based on light microscopy (LM).
DESIGN
Prospective comparative case series METHODS: TRAB specimens from 23 NTG patients (65.4±9.2 years-old), including associated clinical data, as well as 12 autopsy eyes (66±11.2 years-old, P=0.8637), were retrospectively analyzed. LM images of TRAB specimens were captured, and TM spaces, TM cellularity, and pigment granules (PG) accumulation in TM were evaluated using TMAS. TMAS1 assessed regional variations in the juxtacanalicular tissue (JCT), corneoscleral meshwork (CSM), and uveal meshwork (UVM) by dividing these regions into anterior, middle, and posterior segments, while TMAS2 measured the total areas of JCT, CSM, and UVM.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Intraocular pressure, outflow facility, axial length, periods of topical glaucoma medication, spaces in juxtacanalicular tissue, corneoscleral and uveal meshwork, trabecular meshwork cellularity, pigment granule accumulation RESULTS: NTG patients exhibited features such as myopia (-5.5±4.7 D), long axial length (26±2.5 mm), advanced stage of visual field defect (Aulhorn-Greve classification: stage 4.6±0.9), prolonged use of topical-glaucoma medications (13.0±5.0 Y), and subnormal outflow facility (0.24±0.09 µl/min/mmHg). TM spaces measurements showed no notable differences between TMAS1 and TMAS2 in NTG eyes. However, TMAS2 detected a significantly greater reduction in TM spaces (JCT: P=0.000, CSM: P=0.000) and a lower TM cell count (JCT: P=0.0285, UVM: P=0.0006) in NTG specimens compared to autopsy eyes.
CONCLUSION
NTG should not be regarded as a normal variant, as structural abnormalities are present despite normal intraocular pressure. These abnormalities may arise from subtle irregularities in the TM, which may be less pronounced than those in high-tension primary open-angle glaucoma, prolonged use of topical glaucoma medications, or other contributing factors such as increased axial length. TMAS2 has proven to be a useful instrument for assessing not only NTG but also a potential means of identifying different types of high-tension glaucoma through the analysis of TRAB specimens.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.