Evidence Generation and Implementation of Transcatheter Interventions for Atrioventricular Valvular Heart Disease in Heart Failure: Current Status and Future Directions.

IF 35.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Marco Metra,Daniela Tomasoni,Marianna Adamo,Stefan D Anker,Antoni Bayes-Genis,Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben,Michael Böhm,Erwan Donal,Gerasimos S Filippatos,Francesco Maisano,Piotr Ponikowski,Gianluigi Savarese,Fabien Praz,Javed Butler
{"title":"Evidence Generation and Implementation of Transcatheter Interventions for Atrioventricular Valvular Heart Disease in Heart Failure: Current Status and Future Directions.","authors":"Marco Metra,Daniela Tomasoni,Marianna Adamo,Stefan D Anker,Antoni Bayes-Genis,Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben,Michael Böhm,Erwan Donal,Gerasimos S Filippatos,Francesco Maisano,Piotr Ponikowski,Gianluigi Savarese,Fabien Praz,Javed Butler","doi":"10.1161/circulationaha.124.070411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation are the most common valvular heart diseases in patients with heart failure and have independent prognostic value. Transcatheter interventions are now available for the treatment of valvular heart disease, and their efficacy and safety have been tested in randomized controlled trials. However, evidence is still limited and sometimes inconclusive because several aspects of these trials limit their interpretation or consistency. These include heterogeneity in the pathogenesis and clinical characteristics of patients, the dynamic nature of secondary atrioventricular valve disease severity, the role of heart failure medications and devices, dependency on procedural results and operators' skills, smaller number of patients enrolled and the power to detect differences in trials, and limitations to use patients' reported outcomes with unblinded study protocols. These specific aspects of trials in patients with atrioventricular valve disease are reviewed in this article with a focus on possible solutions to generate further evidence for the efficacy and safety for transcatheter treatments of atrioventricular valve disease in patients with heart failure.","PeriodicalId":10331,"journal":{"name":"Circulation","volume":"68 1","pages":"1342-1363"},"PeriodicalIF":35.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.124.070411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation are the most common valvular heart diseases in patients with heart failure and have independent prognostic value. Transcatheter interventions are now available for the treatment of valvular heart disease, and their efficacy and safety have been tested in randomized controlled trials. However, evidence is still limited and sometimes inconclusive because several aspects of these trials limit their interpretation or consistency. These include heterogeneity in the pathogenesis and clinical characteristics of patients, the dynamic nature of secondary atrioventricular valve disease severity, the role of heart failure medications and devices, dependency on procedural results and operators' skills, smaller number of patients enrolled and the power to detect differences in trials, and limitations to use patients' reported outcomes with unblinded study protocols. These specific aspects of trials in patients with atrioventricular valve disease are reviewed in this article with a focus on possible solutions to generate further evidence for the efficacy and safety for transcatheter treatments of atrioventricular valve disease in patients with heart failure.
心衰患者房室瓣膜性心脏病经导管介入治疗的证据生成和实施:现状和未来方向
二尖瓣反流和三尖瓣反流是心力衰竭患者最常见的瓣膜病,具有独立的预后价值。经导管介入现在可用于治疗瓣膜性心脏病,其有效性和安全性已在随机对照试验中得到验证。然而,证据仍然有限,有时是不确定的,因为这些试验的几个方面限制了它们的解释或一致性。这些因素包括患者发病机制和临床特征的异质性,继发性房室瓣膜疾病严重程度的动态性质,心力衰竭药物和设备的作用,对程序结果和操作人员技能的依赖性,入组患者数量较少,试验中检测差异的能力,以及在非盲法研究方案中使用患者报告结果的局限性。本文回顾了房室瓣膜疾病患者试验的这些具体方面,重点讨论了可能的解决方案,以进一步证明经导管治疗心力衰竭患者房室瓣膜疾病的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation
Circulation 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
45.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
1473
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Circulation is a platform that publishes a diverse range of content related to cardiovascular health and disease. This includes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other contributions spanning observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services, outcomes studies, and advancements in basic and translational research. The journal serves as a vital resource for professionals and researchers in the field of cardiovascular health, providing a comprehensive platform for disseminating knowledge and fostering advancements in the understanding and management of cardiovascular issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信