Assessing the Safety Margin for Micromotion-Induced Strain at Electrode–Tissue Interface: A Finite Element Analysis via COMSOL

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ali Sharbatian, Akhilesh Kamtikar, Danesh Ashouri Vajari, Thomas Stieglitz
{"title":"Assessing the Safety Margin for Micromotion-Induced Strain at Electrode–Tissue Interface: A Finite Element Analysis via COMSOL","authors":"Ali Sharbatian,&nbsp;Akhilesh Kamtikar,&nbsp;Danesh Ashouri Vajari,&nbsp;Thomas Stieglitz","doi":"10.1002/admi.202401001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Brain movement significantly impacts the biocompatibility of neural probes, primarily due to continuous loading and strain on neural tissue. This study investigates the strain profile at the electrode–tissue interface under various brain displacements—vertical, lateral, diagonal, and torque—across different brain models (linear elastic, hyperelastic, and viscoelastic). The safety margin for tissue damage is assessed by evaluating a 5% strain threshold using two probe widths (30 µm and 100 µm) in tethered and floating configurations. The probe dimensions are informed by previously developed devices implanted in rats for 12 weeks, allowing to correlate the findings with existing immunohistochemical data. A comprehensive simulation studies accounting for various conditions, such as different brain displacements and physics, has not been reported elsewhere. These results challenge the conventional 5% strain threshold for tissue damage, revealing that strains below this critical limit may still pose risks depending on probe geometry and brain model. Furthermore, these simulations underscore the necessity of size-dependent micromotion models for accurate predictions in untethered conditions. This work highlights the feasibility of integrating immunohistological data into simulation studies, offering valuable insights for researchers while minimizing the need for extensive animal testing during initial probe design phases.</p>","PeriodicalId":115,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Materials Interfaces","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/admi.202401001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Materials Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/admi.202401001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain movement significantly impacts the biocompatibility of neural probes, primarily due to continuous loading and strain on neural tissue. This study investigates the strain profile at the electrode–tissue interface under various brain displacements—vertical, lateral, diagonal, and torque—across different brain models (linear elastic, hyperelastic, and viscoelastic). The safety margin for tissue damage is assessed by evaluating a 5% strain threshold using two probe widths (30 µm and 100 µm) in tethered and floating configurations. The probe dimensions are informed by previously developed devices implanted in rats for 12 weeks, allowing to correlate the findings with existing immunohistochemical data. A comprehensive simulation studies accounting for various conditions, such as different brain displacements and physics, has not been reported elsewhere. These results challenge the conventional 5% strain threshold for tissue damage, revealing that strains below this critical limit may still pose risks depending on probe geometry and brain model. Furthermore, these simulations underscore the necessity of size-dependent micromotion models for accurate predictions in untethered conditions. This work highlights the feasibility of integrating immunohistological data into simulation studies, offering valuable insights for researchers while minimizing the need for extensive animal testing during initial probe design phases.

Abstract Image

电极-组织界面微动应变安全裕度评估:COMSOL有限元分析
大脑运动显著影响神经探针的生物相容性,主要是由于神经组织的持续负荷和应变。本研究考察了不同脑模型(线弹性、超弹性和粘弹性)在不同脑位移(垂直、横向、对角线和扭矩)下电极-组织界面的应变分布。在系留和浮动配置中,使用两种探头宽度(30µm和100µm),通过评估5%的应变阈值来评估组织损伤的安全裕度。探针尺寸由先前开发的植入大鼠12周的装置获得,允许将发现与现有的免疫组织化学数据相关联。一项综合的模拟研究考虑了不同的条件,如不同的大脑位移和物理,在其他地方还没有报道。这些结果挑战了传统的5%应变阈值的组织损伤,表明低于这个临界极限的应变仍可能造成风险,这取决于探针的几何形状和大脑模型。此外,这些模拟强调了在无系绳条件下精确预测尺寸相关微运动模型的必要性。这项工作强调了将免疫组织学数据整合到模拟研究中的可行性,为研究人员提供了有价值的见解,同时最大限度地减少了在初始探针设计阶段对大量动物试验的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced Materials Interfaces
Advanced Materials Interfaces CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
1174
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: Advanced Materials Interfaces publishes top-level research on interface technologies and effects. Considering any interface formed between solids, liquids, and gases, the journal ensures an interdisciplinary blend of physics, chemistry, materials science, and life sciences. Advanced Materials Interfaces was launched in 2014 and received an Impact Factor of 4.834 in 2018. The scope of Advanced Materials Interfaces is dedicated to interfaces and surfaces that play an essential role in virtually all materials and devices. Physics, chemistry, materials science and life sciences blend to encourage new, cross-pollinating ideas, which will drive forward our understanding of the processes at the interface. Advanced Materials Interfaces covers all topics in interface-related research: Oil / water separation, Applications of nanostructured materials, 2D materials and heterostructures, Surfaces and interfaces in organic electronic devices, Catalysis and membranes, Self-assembly and nanopatterned surfaces, Composite and coating materials, Biointerfaces for technical and medical applications. Advanced Materials Interfaces provides a forum for topics on surface and interface science with a wide choice of formats: Reviews, Full Papers, and Communications, as well as Progress Reports and Research News.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信