Electrodynamic and Ionospheric Puzzles of the 10–11 May 2024 Geomagnetic Superstorm

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
E. Astafyeva, B. Maletckii, M. Förster, I. D. Ouar, J. D. Huba, M. R. Hairston, W. R. Coley
{"title":"Electrodynamic and Ionospheric Puzzles of the 10–11 May 2024 Geomagnetic Superstorm","authors":"E. Astafyeva,&nbsp;B. Maletckii,&nbsp;M. Förster,&nbsp;I. D. Ouar,&nbsp;J. D. Huba,&nbsp;M. R. Hairston,&nbsp;W. R. Coley","doi":"10.1029/2024JA033284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>On 10 May 2024, a powerful coronal mass ejection arrived at Earth at 17:05UT and caused a major geomagnetic storm. With the minimum SYM-H excursion of −497 nT (5-min data), this storm is the largest geomagnetic disturbance since March 1989, and can be categorized as a superstorm. In this work, by using ground-based and space-borne instruments, we focus on unusual aspects of the electrodynamic and ionospheric response to the May 2024 storm at middle and low latitudes. Between the storm onset at 17:05UT, and until ∼19:40UT, we observed signatures of strong unshielded prompt penetration electric fields (PPEF), which caused an increase of the equatorial ExB drifts up to 95 m/s. This led to the occurrence of a strong ionospheric super-fountain effect. The local pre-noon sector was the first to respond to the PPEF, with a very rapid increase of the ionization and the EIA development in the local morning sector. Whereas, in the afternoon-evening sector the ionosphere responded with ∼2 hr of delay, and the response continued to intensify even after the equatorial ExB drifts had dropped to undisturbed values. The development of such a powerful super-fountain effect without or with little electrodynamic forcing is difficult to explain, but it could be due to storm-time meridional and zonal thermospheric winds. During the early recovery phase of the storm, a second positive ionospheric storm occurred over the Australian-West Pacific region in the local late afternoon to pre-midnight sector, driven by another ionospheric uplift associated with the occurrence of smaller-amplitude equatorial upward ExB drifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"130 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA033284","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 10 May 2024, a powerful coronal mass ejection arrived at Earth at 17:05UT and caused a major geomagnetic storm. With the minimum SYM-H excursion of −497 nT (5-min data), this storm is the largest geomagnetic disturbance since March 1989, and can be categorized as a superstorm. In this work, by using ground-based and space-borne instruments, we focus on unusual aspects of the electrodynamic and ionospheric response to the May 2024 storm at middle and low latitudes. Between the storm onset at 17:05UT, and until ∼19:40UT, we observed signatures of strong unshielded prompt penetration electric fields (PPEF), which caused an increase of the equatorial ExB drifts up to 95 m/s. This led to the occurrence of a strong ionospheric super-fountain effect. The local pre-noon sector was the first to respond to the PPEF, with a very rapid increase of the ionization and the EIA development in the local morning sector. Whereas, in the afternoon-evening sector the ionosphere responded with ∼2 hr of delay, and the response continued to intensify even after the equatorial ExB drifts had dropped to undisturbed values. The development of such a powerful super-fountain effect without or with little electrodynamic forcing is difficult to explain, but it could be due to storm-time meridional and zonal thermospheric winds. During the early recovery phase of the storm, a second positive ionospheric storm occurred over the Australian-West Pacific region in the local late afternoon to pre-midnight sector, driven by another ionospheric uplift associated with the occurrence of smaller-amplitude equatorial upward ExB drifts.

Abstract Image

2024年5月10-11日地磁超级风暴的电动力学和电离层之谜
在2024年5月10日,一个强大的日冕物质抛射在17:05到达地球,并引起了一场主要的地磁风暴。该风暴是自1989年3月以来最大的地磁扰动,具有- 497 nT(5分钟数据)的最小SYM-H偏移,可归类为超级风暴。在这项工作中,通过使用地基和天基仪器,我们重点研究了2024年5月中低纬度风暴的电动力学和电离层响应的不同寻常方面。在17点05分至19点40分之间,我们观测到强烈的非屏蔽提示穿透电场(PPEF)的特征,这导致赤道ExB漂移增加至95 m/s。这导致了强烈的电离层超级喷泉效应的出现。当地中午前时段最先对PPEF做出反应,上午时段电离和环评发展非常迅速。然而,在下午和晚上部分,电离层响应延迟约2小时,即使在赤道ExB漂移下降到未受干扰的值后,响应仍在继续增强。如此强大的超级喷泉效应的发展,没有或只有很少的电动力强迫是很难解释的,但它可能是由于风暴期间经向和纬向热层风。在风暴的早期恢复阶段,澳大利亚-西太平洋地区在当地下午晚些时候到午夜前发生了第二次正电离层风暴,这是由另一次电离层隆起引起的较小振幅的赤道向上的ExB漂移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
35.70%
发文量
570
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信