{"title":"Vasectomy, Management, and Pain: A Natural Language Processing Analysis of Online Communities","authors":"K. A. Pimbblet","doi":"10.1111/ijun.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Is the use of vasectomy in the United Kingdom experiencing a significant decline due to knowledge of post-vasectomy pain syndrome transmitted through online public forums? Although vasectomy is regularly used as a form of contraception and is generally considered to be safe, the frequency of use within the United Kingdom has fallen very significantly over the past few decades. The greatest risk of the surgery is arguably post-vasectomy pain syndrome, and it is debated how frequent this outcome is, how men emotionally react to such pain—or anticipated pain related to vasectomy. This has implications for counselling men prior to surgery and management. We use public data from Reddit to analyse the perceptions of pain, the frequency of post-vasectomy pain syndrome, and how such pain is resolved. We perform a systematic natural language processing assessment of the largest Reddit communities discussing vasectomy for the first time. We show that the dominant emotional reaction to vasectomy is that of fear—especially in relation to perceived or anticipated pain. Despite this, most men ultimately hold a positive sentiment about vasectomy, albeit at various levels of subjectivity. There are, however, a significant percentage of men who experience strong and negative emotions and experiences of vasectomy—including both the procedure and post-vasectomy pain syndrome. We place a new upper limit on post-vasectomy pain syndrome of 8% using 11 244 posts and estimate life-affecting pain has an upper limit of 2%, with a similar rate of surgery regret. We show that reversal is the most frequently discussed solution to this pain by a factor of approximately 4 compared to other invasive methods. We suggest that any information and consent forms issued to prospective men no longer ethically describe vasectomy complications as “rare” or “very rare”. New onset pain is common for vasectomy. With such public discussion now firmly in place, we hypothesise that vasectomy will see further decreased use in the short term.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.70016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Is the use of vasectomy in the United Kingdom experiencing a significant decline due to knowledge of post-vasectomy pain syndrome transmitted through online public forums? Although vasectomy is regularly used as a form of contraception and is generally considered to be safe, the frequency of use within the United Kingdom has fallen very significantly over the past few decades. The greatest risk of the surgery is arguably post-vasectomy pain syndrome, and it is debated how frequent this outcome is, how men emotionally react to such pain—or anticipated pain related to vasectomy. This has implications for counselling men prior to surgery and management. We use public data from Reddit to analyse the perceptions of pain, the frequency of post-vasectomy pain syndrome, and how such pain is resolved. We perform a systematic natural language processing assessment of the largest Reddit communities discussing vasectomy for the first time. We show that the dominant emotional reaction to vasectomy is that of fear—especially in relation to perceived or anticipated pain. Despite this, most men ultimately hold a positive sentiment about vasectomy, albeit at various levels of subjectivity. There are, however, a significant percentage of men who experience strong and negative emotions and experiences of vasectomy—including both the procedure and post-vasectomy pain syndrome. We place a new upper limit on post-vasectomy pain syndrome of 8% using 11 244 posts and estimate life-affecting pain has an upper limit of 2%, with a similar rate of surgery regret. We show that reversal is the most frequently discussed solution to this pain by a factor of approximately 4 compared to other invasive methods. We suggest that any information and consent forms issued to prospective men no longer ethically describe vasectomy complications as “rare” or “very rare”. New onset pain is common for vasectomy. With such public discussion now firmly in place, we hypothesise that vasectomy will see further decreased use in the short term.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice.
The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas:
-General Urology-
Continence care-
Oncology-
Andrology-
Stoma care-
Paediatric urology-
Men’s health-
Uro-gynaecology-
Reconstructive surgery-
Clinical audit-
Clinical governance-
Nurse-led services-
Reflective analysis-
Education-
Management-
Research-
Leadership
The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.