Vasectomy, Management, and Pain: A Natural Language Processing Analysis of Online Communities

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
K. A. Pimbblet
{"title":"Vasectomy, Management, and Pain: A Natural Language Processing Analysis of Online Communities","authors":"K. A. Pimbblet","doi":"10.1111/ijun.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Is the use of vasectomy in the United Kingdom experiencing a significant decline due to knowledge of post-vasectomy pain syndrome transmitted through online public forums? Although vasectomy is regularly used as a form of contraception and is generally considered to be safe, the frequency of use within the United Kingdom has fallen very significantly over the past few decades. The greatest risk of the surgery is arguably post-vasectomy pain syndrome, and it is debated how frequent this outcome is, how men emotionally react to such pain—or anticipated pain related to vasectomy. This has implications for counselling men prior to surgery and management. We use public data from Reddit to analyse the perceptions of pain, the frequency of post-vasectomy pain syndrome, and how such pain is resolved. We perform a systematic natural language processing assessment of the largest Reddit communities discussing vasectomy for the first time. We show that the dominant emotional reaction to vasectomy is that of fear—especially in relation to perceived or anticipated pain. Despite this, most men ultimately hold a positive sentiment about vasectomy, albeit at various levels of subjectivity. There are, however, a significant percentage of men who experience strong and negative emotions and experiences of vasectomy—including both the procedure and post-vasectomy pain syndrome. We place a new upper limit on post-vasectomy pain syndrome of 8% using 11 244 posts and estimate life-affecting pain has an upper limit of 2%, with a similar rate of surgery regret. We show that reversal is the most frequently discussed solution to this pain by a factor of approximately 4 compared to other invasive methods. We suggest that any information and consent forms issued to prospective men no longer ethically describe vasectomy complications as “rare” or “very rare”. New onset pain is common for vasectomy. With such public discussion now firmly in place, we hypothesise that vasectomy will see further decreased use in the short term.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.70016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is the use of vasectomy in the United Kingdom experiencing a significant decline due to knowledge of post-vasectomy pain syndrome transmitted through online public forums? Although vasectomy is regularly used as a form of contraception and is generally considered to be safe, the frequency of use within the United Kingdom has fallen very significantly over the past few decades. The greatest risk of the surgery is arguably post-vasectomy pain syndrome, and it is debated how frequent this outcome is, how men emotionally react to such pain—or anticipated pain related to vasectomy. This has implications for counselling men prior to surgery and management. We use public data from Reddit to analyse the perceptions of pain, the frequency of post-vasectomy pain syndrome, and how such pain is resolved. We perform a systematic natural language processing assessment of the largest Reddit communities discussing vasectomy for the first time. We show that the dominant emotional reaction to vasectomy is that of fear—especially in relation to perceived or anticipated pain. Despite this, most men ultimately hold a positive sentiment about vasectomy, albeit at various levels of subjectivity. There are, however, a significant percentage of men who experience strong and negative emotions and experiences of vasectomy—including both the procedure and post-vasectomy pain syndrome. We place a new upper limit on post-vasectomy pain syndrome of 8% using 11 244 posts and estimate life-affecting pain has an upper limit of 2%, with a similar rate of surgery regret. We show that reversal is the most frequently discussed solution to this pain by a factor of approximately 4 compared to other invasive methods. We suggest that any information and consent forms issued to prospective men no longer ethically describe vasectomy complications as “rare” or “very rare”. New onset pain is common for vasectomy. With such public discussion now firmly in place, we hypothesise that vasectomy will see further decreased use in the short term.

输精管切除术,管理和疼痛:在线社区的自然语言处理分析
英国输精管结扎术的使用是否由于输精管结扎后疼痛综合征的知识通过在线公共论坛传播而显著下降?虽然输精管结扎术是一种常用的避孕方法,而且通常被认为是安全的,但在英国,结扎术的使用频率在过去几十年里显著下降。手术的最大风险可能是输精管结扎后疼痛综合征,这种结果的发生频率、男性对这种疼痛的情绪反应或与输精管结扎相关的预期疼痛都存在争议。这意味着在手术和治疗前对男性进行咨询。我们使用来自Reddit的公开数据来分析疼痛的感知,输精管结扎后疼痛综合征的频率,以及这种疼痛是如何解决的。我们首次对讨论输精管切除术的最大Reddit社区进行了系统的自然语言处理评估。我们发现对输精管结扎术的主要情绪反应是恐惧,特别是与感知或预期的疼痛有关。尽管如此,大多数男性最终对输精管结扎术持积极态度,尽管主观程度各不相同。然而,有相当比例的男性经历过强烈的负面情绪和输精管切除术的经历——包括输精管切除术过程和输精管切除术后的疼痛综合征。我们使用了11244篇文章,对输精管结扎后疼痛综合征设定了新的上限为8%,并估计影响生命的疼痛的上限为2%,手术后悔率相似。我们表明,与其他侵入性方法相比,逆转是最常被讨论的解决这种疼痛的方法,其系数约为4。我们建议,发给未来男性的任何信息和同意表格不再将输精管切除术并发症描述为“罕见”或“非常罕见”。输精管结扎术后新发疼痛很常见。有了这样的公众讨论,我们假设输精管结扎术的使用将在短期内进一步减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信