Legacy Effects of Flooding Duration on Growth and Reproductive Traits of Carex cinerascens in the Poyang Lake Wetland

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Wenlan Feng, Pierre Mariotte, Ligang Xu, Luca Bragazza, Alexandre Buttler, Junxiang Cheng, Mathieu Santonja
{"title":"Legacy Effects of Flooding Duration on Growth and Reproductive Traits of Carex cinerascens in the Poyang Lake Wetland","authors":"Wenlan Feng,&nbsp;Pierre Mariotte,&nbsp;Ligang Xu,&nbsp;Luca Bragazza,&nbsp;Alexandre Buttler,&nbsp;Junxiang Cheng,&nbsp;Mathieu Santonja","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Alteration of flooding regimes due to global change may have cascading effects on plant community composition and associated ecosystem services. Here, we experimentally investigated the effects of six flooding regimes with contrasting combinations of flooding duration (5.5, 6 and 6.5 months) and submergence rate (from 3.3 to 17.5 cm/day) on the growth and reproductive traits of <i>Carex cinerascens</i>, a dominant plant species of the Poyang Lake wetland in southern China. The time span of this study included a summer flooding event and the following growing seasons (autumn of first year and spring of following year) before the return of the next flooding event. The six flooding treatments affected plant traits during the flooding and the following growing seasons, but the different submergence rates under the same flooding duration did generally not show significant influence on plant traits. The 6.5-month flooding treatments had many fewer old (0.4 on average) and new stems (1 on average) than the 5.5-month treatments (8.3 and 29 stems, respectively) at the end of the flooding. The treatments with 5.5 months of flooding had 23% more stems than the other treatments and 26% more community biomass than the 6-month flooding treatments during the autumn growing season. The effects of summer flooding persisted in spring of the following year, but with an opposite trend of <i>C. cinerascens</i> growth traits response to flooding treatments compared to autumn. In addition, the 6-month flooding treatments induced a higher number of inflorescences (39) than the 5.5-month (22) and 6.5-month floods (3). Altogether, our findings highlighted the important legacy effects of summer flooding with some trade-offs between growth recovery (autumn) and resilience (following spring) and between resource allocation to biomass production in autumn and resource allocation to sexual reproduction in the following spring, that were both mediated by flooding duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71395","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alteration of flooding regimes due to global change may have cascading effects on plant community composition and associated ecosystem services. Here, we experimentally investigated the effects of six flooding regimes with contrasting combinations of flooding duration (5.5, 6 and 6.5 months) and submergence rate (from 3.3 to 17.5 cm/day) on the growth and reproductive traits of Carex cinerascens, a dominant plant species of the Poyang Lake wetland in southern China. The time span of this study included a summer flooding event and the following growing seasons (autumn of first year and spring of following year) before the return of the next flooding event. The six flooding treatments affected plant traits during the flooding and the following growing seasons, but the different submergence rates under the same flooding duration did generally not show significant influence on plant traits. The 6.5-month flooding treatments had many fewer old (0.4 on average) and new stems (1 on average) than the 5.5-month treatments (8.3 and 29 stems, respectively) at the end of the flooding. The treatments with 5.5 months of flooding had 23% more stems than the other treatments and 26% more community biomass than the 6-month flooding treatments during the autumn growing season. The effects of summer flooding persisted in spring of the following year, but with an opposite trend of C. cinerascens growth traits response to flooding treatments compared to autumn. In addition, the 6-month flooding treatments induced a higher number of inflorescences (39) than the 5.5-month (22) and 6.5-month floods (3). Altogether, our findings highlighted the important legacy effects of summer flooding with some trade-offs between growth recovery (autumn) and resilience (following spring) and between resource allocation to biomass production in autumn and resource allocation to sexual reproduction in the following spring, that were both mediated by flooding duration.

Abstract Image

淹水时间对鄱阳湖湿地苔草生长和生殖性状的影响
全球变化导致的洪涝状态的改变可能对植物群落组成和相关的生态系统服务产生级联效应。本文以鄱阳湖湿地为研究对象,研究了6种不同淹水条件下(5.5、6和6.5个月)和淹没率(3.3 ~ 17.5 cm/d)对羊草(Carex cinerascens)生长和生殖特性的影响。本研究的时间跨度包括夏季洪水事件和接下来的生长季节(第一年秋季和第二年春季),然后再发生下一次洪水事件。6个淹水处理在淹水期及其后的生长季节对植株性状均有影响,但相同淹水期不同淹水率对植株性状的影响一般不显著。在淹水结束时,6.5个月处理的老茎(平均0.4根)和新茎(平均1根)比5.5个月处理(分别为8.3根和29根)少得多。在秋季生长期,淹水5.5个月处理的茎数比其他处理多23%,群落生物量比淹水6个月处理多26%。夏季淹水的影响持续到次年春季,但羊草生长性状对淹水处理的响应趋势与秋季相反。此外,6个月淹水处理诱导的花序数(39)高于5.5个月(22)和6.5个月淹水处理(3)。总之,我们的研究结果强调了夏季洪水的重要遗留效应,其中包括生长恢复(秋季)和恢复力(春季)之间的一些权衡,以及秋季生物量生产的资源分配和来年春季有性生殖的资源分配之间的权衡,这些权衡都由洪水持续时间介导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信