{"title":"Integrating litho-stratigraphic and equotip-based analyses to support engineering-geological modelling for site response studies","authors":"Marta Cupido, Elisa Mammoliti, Riccardo Teloni, Snježana Markušić, Piero Farabollini, Stefano Santini","doi":"10.1007/s10064-025-04290-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The 2016 earthquake in Central Italy caused varying degrees of damage across Camerino's historic centre (Italy). Two medieval masonry buildings, despite their similar construction characteristics and close proximity, exhibited notable differences in damage extent, highlighting the role of seismic amplification in historic urban areas. This study aims to refine site-specific seismic response analyses by developing a detailed engineering-geological model that integrates litho-stratigraphic, geotechnical, and geophysical data. <i>In-situ</i> mechanical analyses with Equotip on outcropping rocks beneath the buildings, combined with borehole and geophysical data, enabled the identification of key lithological and geotechnical contrasts. These findings revealed significant stratigraphic heterogeneity between the two sites. The first exhibited alternating layers of varying stiffness and velocity, while the second presented a more homogeneous stratigraphy, yet weathered in its shallower portion. These differences influenced site amplification, correlating with greater structural damage at the first site and less deterioration at the second. Variations in litho-mechanical properties, including lower Equotip hardness values and distinct seismic velocities in weathered units, contributed to these discrepancies. This research emphasises the importance of integrating detailed stratigraphic reconstructions with seismic analysis to enhance the resilience of historic structures. The developed methodology provides a transferable framework for seismic risk assessment and retrofitting strategies in other heritage sites. By enhancing subsurface analysis, this approach contributes to cultural heritage preservation in seismically active regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":500,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","volume":"84 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10064-025-04290-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-025-04290-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The 2016 earthquake in Central Italy caused varying degrees of damage across Camerino's historic centre (Italy). Two medieval masonry buildings, despite their similar construction characteristics and close proximity, exhibited notable differences in damage extent, highlighting the role of seismic amplification in historic urban areas. This study aims to refine site-specific seismic response analyses by developing a detailed engineering-geological model that integrates litho-stratigraphic, geotechnical, and geophysical data. In-situ mechanical analyses with Equotip on outcropping rocks beneath the buildings, combined with borehole and geophysical data, enabled the identification of key lithological and geotechnical contrasts. These findings revealed significant stratigraphic heterogeneity between the two sites. The first exhibited alternating layers of varying stiffness and velocity, while the second presented a more homogeneous stratigraphy, yet weathered in its shallower portion. These differences influenced site amplification, correlating with greater structural damage at the first site and less deterioration at the second. Variations in litho-mechanical properties, including lower Equotip hardness values and distinct seismic velocities in weathered units, contributed to these discrepancies. This research emphasises the importance of integrating detailed stratigraphic reconstructions with seismic analysis to enhance the resilience of historic structures. The developed methodology provides a transferable framework for seismic risk assessment and retrofitting strategies in other heritage sites. By enhancing subsurface analysis, this approach contributes to cultural heritage preservation in seismically active regions.
期刊介绍:
Engineering geology is defined in the statutes of the IAEG as the science devoted to the investigation, study and solution of engineering and environmental problems which may arise as the result of the interaction between geology and the works or activities of man, as well as of the prediction of and development of measures for the prevention or remediation of geological hazards. Engineering geology embraces:
• the applications/implications of the geomorphology, structural geology, and hydrogeological conditions of geological formations;
• the characterisation of the mineralogical, physico-geomechanical, chemical and hydraulic properties of all earth materials involved in construction, resource recovery and environmental change;
• the assessment of the mechanical and hydrological behaviour of soil and rock masses;
• the prediction of changes to the above properties with time;
• the determination of the parameters to be considered in the stability analysis of engineering works and earth masses.