Minqi Wang;Jeremy Potet;Stephane Le Huerou;Jean-Yves Cloarec;Irene Grosclaude;Frederic Miet;Philippe Chanclou
{"title":"Experimental evaluation of low-latency features in optical access networks and home gateways","authors":"Minqi Wang;Jeremy Potet;Stephane Le Huerou;Jean-Yves Cloarec;Irene Grosclaude;Frederic Miet;Philippe Chanclou","doi":"10.1364/JOCN.560139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With widespread 10 Gbps-capable PON technologies in the access network and Wi-Fi 6E/7 in the home network, final customers can easily enjoy a gigabit experience at home. However, with such enormous bandwidth provided, customers are not always satisfied with their experience, particularly for real-time services, such as VR gaming, cloud gaming, or visio-conferencing, due to network latency issues. In this paper, we focus on optimizing congestion latency that can arise in both home gateway and access networks while keeping an eye on bandwidth-sharing fairness without strictly prioritizing certain traffic. To assess end-to-end performance, our setup includes Internet servers, access/home networks, and customers’ equipment. Transport layer protocols in the TCP/IP model are deployed in both Internet servers and end-user equipment. TCP Prague is implemented to represent time-sensitive services that require a high bitrate, such as VR, and TCP Cubic is used for other common services without low-latency criteria. We create a two-level congestion scenario, configuring different QoS parameters within access equipment and home gateways to compare performance. In our best case, the latency of time-sensitive traffic is at least 10 times lower than other applications and gains more than 30 ms E2E RTT during full congestion scenarios.","PeriodicalId":50103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optical Communications and Networking","volume":"17 6","pages":"439-447"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optical Communications and Networking","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10989056/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With widespread 10 Gbps-capable PON technologies in the access network and Wi-Fi 6E/7 in the home network, final customers can easily enjoy a gigabit experience at home. However, with such enormous bandwidth provided, customers are not always satisfied with their experience, particularly for real-time services, such as VR gaming, cloud gaming, or visio-conferencing, due to network latency issues. In this paper, we focus on optimizing congestion latency that can arise in both home gateway and access networks while keeping an eye on bandwidth-sharing fairness without strictly prioritizing certain traffic. To assess end-to-end performance, our setup includes Internet servers, access/home networks, and customers’ equipment. Transport layer protocols in the TCP/IP model are deployed in both Internet servers and end-user equipment. TCP Prague is implemented to represent time-sensitive services that require a high bitrate, such as VR, and TCP Cubic is used for other common services without low-latency criteria. We create a two-level congestion scenario, configuring different QoS parameters within access equipment and home gateways to compare performance. In our best case, the latency of time-sensitive traffic is at least 10 times lower than other applications and gains more than 30 ms E2E RTT during full congestion scenarios.
期刊介绍:
The scope of the Journal includes advances in the state-of-the-art of optical networking science, technology, and engineering. Both theoretical contributions (including new techniques, concepts, analyses, and economic studies) and practical contributions (including optical networking experiments, prototypes, and new applications) are encouraged. Subareas of interest include the architecture and design of optical networks, optical network survivability and security, software-defined optical networking, elastic optical networks, data and control plane advances, network management related innovation, and optical access networks. Enabling technologies and their applications are suitable topics only if the results are shown to directly impact optical networking beyond simple point-to-point networks.