Effects of impactor geometry and multiple impacts on low-velocity impact response and residual compressive strength of fiber-reinforced composite laminates

IF 12.7 1区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Peyman Shabani , Lucy Li , Jeremy Laliberte
{"title":"Effects of impactor geometry and multiple impacts on low-velocity impact response and residual compressive strength of fiber-reinforced composite laminates","authors":"Peyman Shabani ,&nbsp;Lucy Li ,&nbsp;Jeremy Laliberte","doi":"10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fiber-reinforced composite panels used in aerospace applications often experience low-velocity impacts (LVI) during service and maintenance by objects of various shapes, sizes, and masses, which can significantly reduce the panel's residual compressive strength. This study provides a detailed numerical and experimental analysis of LVI and compression after impact (CAI) failure mechanisms of laminates impacted by different impactor sizes and masses, along with damage accumulation during multiple impacts, and presents an effective approach for modeling progressive damage in composite laminates. The experiments were conducted using three hemispherical impactors with diameters of 6.35 mm (sharp), 25.4 mm (standard), and 96 mm (blunt), at impact energy levels of 30 J and 75 J, corresponding to barely and clearly visible impact damage (BVID and CVID). Quasi-isotropic IM7/977-3 composite specimens, sized 254 mm × 304.8 mm, were used to better represent large composite panels and study a wider range of impact scenarios. A finite element modeling methodology was developed based on the integrated enhanced LaRC05 failure criteria and the cohesive zone modeling technique to predict various composite failure modes, such as fiber breakage, pull-out, kinking, crushing, and splitting, as well as matrix cracking and delamination. The LaRC05 fiber tensile failure criterion was revised based on experimental data, improving the accuracy of the model at higher impact energies. At the same energy level, the sharp impactor caused more concentrated and severe damage, leading to lower CAI strength. The blunt impactor caused less surface damage but similar internal delamination and CAI strength compared to the standard impactor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10660,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part B: Engineering","volume":"303 ","pages":"Article 112575"},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part B: Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359836825004767","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced composite panels used in aerospace applications often experience low-velocity impacts (LVI) during service and maintenance by objects of various shapes, sizes, and masses, which can significantly reduce the panel's residual compressive strength. This study provides a detailed numerical and experimental analysis of LVI and compression after impact (CAI) failure mechanisms of laminates impacted by different impactor sizes and masses, along with damage accumulation during multiple impacts, and presents an effective approach for modeling progressive damage in composite laminates. The experiments were conducted using three hemispherical impactors with diameters of 6.35 mm (sharp), 25.4 mm (standard), and 96 mm (blunt), at impact energy levels of 30 J and 75 J, corresponding to barely and clearly visible impact damage (BVID and CVID). Quasi-isotropic IM7/977-3 composite specimens, sized 254 mm × 304.8 mm, were used to better represent large composite panels and study a wider range of impact scenarios. A finite element modeling methodology was developed based on the integrated enhanced LaRC05 failure criteria and the cohesive zone modeling technique to predict various composite failure modes, such as fiber breakage, pull-out, kinking, crushing, and splitting, as well as matrix cracking and delamination. The LaRC05 fiber tensile failure criterion was revised based on experimental data, improving the accuracy of the model at higher impact energies. At the same energy level, the sharp impactor caused more concentrated and severe damage, leading to lower CAI strength. The blunt impactor caused less surface damage but similar internal delamination and CAI strength compared to the standard impactor.
冲击器几何形状和多次冲击对纤维增强复合材料层合板低速冲击响应和残余抗压强度的影响
在航空航天应用中使用的纤维增强复合材料板在服务和维护过程中经常受到各种形状、尺寸和质量的物体的低速冲击(LVI),这会大大降低面板的残余抗压强度。本研究对不同尺寸和质量的冲击体撞击层合板的LVI和冲击后压缩(CAI)破坏机制以及多次撞击过程中的损伤累积进行了详细的数值和实验分析,为复合材料层合板的渐进损伤建模提供了一种有效的方法。实验采用三种直径分别为6.35 mm(锋利)、25.4 mm(标准)和96 mm(钝)的半球形冲击器,冲击能量等级分别为30 J和75 J,对应于几乎可见和清晰可见的冲击损伤(BVID和CVID)。拟各向同性IM7/977-3复合材料试样,尺寸为254 mm × 304.8 mm,可以更好地代表大型复合材料面板,研究更广泛的冲击场景。基于集成的增强型LaRC05失效准则和内聚区建模技术,开发了一种有限元建模方法,用于预测各种复合材料的失效模式,如纤维断裂、拔出、扭结、破碎、劈裂以及基体开裂和分层。基于实验数据对LaRC05纤维拉伸破坏准则进行了修正,提高了模型在高冲击能下的精度。在相同的能量水平下,锋利的冲击器造成的损伤更加集中和严重,导致CAI强度降低。钝冲击器造成的表面损伤较小,但内部分层和CAI强度与标准冲击器相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Composites Part B: Engineering
Composites Part B: Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
24.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
784
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Composites Part B: Engineering is a journal that publishes impactful research of high quality on composite materials. This research is supported by fundamental mechanics and materials science and engineering approaches. The targeted research can cover a wide range of length scales, ranging from nano to micro and meso, and even to the full product and structure level. The journal specifically focuses on engineering applications that involve high performance composites. These applications can range from low volume and high cost to high volume and low cost composite development. The main goal of the journal is to provide a platform for the prompt publication of original and high quality research. The emphasis is on design, development, modeling, validation, and manufacturing of engineering details and concepts. The journal welcomes both basic research papers and proposals for review articles. Authors are encouraged to address challenges across various application areas. These areas include, but are not limited to, aerospace, automotive, and other surface transportation. The journal also covers energy-related applications, with a focus on renewable energy. Other application areas include infrastructure, off-shore and maritime projects, health care technology, and recreational products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信