The effects of organic fertilization systems on yield and yield variability of lucerne and market crops: Insights from a 10-year field experiment in Austria

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Aliyeh Salehi , Andreas Surböck , Gabriele Gollner , Josef Eitzinger , Jürgen K. Friedel , Marie-Luise Wohlmuth , Bernhard Freyer
{"title":"The effects of organic fertilization systems on yield and yield variability of lucerne and market crops: Insights from a 10-year field experiment in Austria","authors":"Aliyeh Salehi ,&nbsp;Andreas Surböck ,&nbsp;Gabriele Gollner ,&nbsp;Josef Eitzinger ,&nbsp;Jürgen K. Friedel ,&nbsp;Marie-Luise Wohlmuth ,&nbsp;Bernhard Freyer","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2025.127662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The 10-year effects of organic fertilization have been shown to enhance crop yields and contribute to sustainable agricultural productivity, although the extent of these benefits can vary depending on specific conditions and management practices. To investigate the impact of different organic fertilization approaches, the present study examined the effects of livestock-keeping and stockless organic fertilization systems on the yield and yield variability of lucerne and market crops (such as grain maize, spring barley, field pea, winter rye, winter wheat after lucerne (WWL), and winter wheat after peas (WWP)) in Eastern Austria over a 10-year period. The study tested three organic fertilization systems with continuous application of organic fertilizers as follows: FS1: without livestock, only lucerne green manure (GM); FS2: without livestock, lucerne green manure and municipal compost (GM+MC); and FS3: with livestock, lucerne forage use and farmyard manure application (FU+FYM). The study found that the dry matter (DM) of lucerne and the grain yield of market crops distinctly varied from year to year, with higher productivity observed during years with more favorable weather conditions. Moreover, the 10-year application of organic fertilizers, especially GM+MC and FU+FYM, increased the grain yield of all studied market crops except maize and field peas in comparison with GM. The simplified soil surface nitrogen (N) balance estimation revealed large differences between the fertilization systems. The GM treatments showed a highly positive N balance (196–374 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>) due to N retention in the aboveground biomass of lucerne and assumed minimal gaseous ammonia losses (GM and GM+MC) as well as high N input via compost fertilization (GM+MC). Regarding yield stability, the study found that organic fertilization systems only affected the variability of DM in WWL, with the highest variability observed in the FU+FYM system. In conclusion, the study suggests that GM+MC (FS2) and FU+FYM (FS3) have potential for improving crop productivity and nutrient values in organic farming, based on findings from a 10-year investigation. Moreover, during the study period, no adverse effects of a diversified farming system without livestock (FS2: GM+MC) were observed during the study period compared to a manure-based farming system with livestock (FS3: FU+FYM).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 127662"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030125001583","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 10-year effects of organic fertilization have been shown to enhance crop yields and contribute to sustainable agricultural productivity, although the extent of these benefits can vary depending on specific conditions and management practices. To investigate the impact of different organic fertilization approaches, the present study examined the effects of livestock-keeping and stockless organic fertilization systems on the yield and yield variability of lucerne and market crops (such as grain maize, spring barley, field pea, winter rye, winter wheat after lucerne (WWL), and winter wheat after peas (WWP)) in Eastern Austria over a 10-year period. The study tested three organic fertilization systems with continuous application of organic fertilizers as follows: FS1: without livestock, only lucerne green manure (GM); FS2: without livestock, lucerne green manure and municipal compost (GM+MC); and FS3: with livestock, lucerne forage use and farmyard manure application (FU+FYM). The study found that the dry matter (DM) of lucerne and the grain yield of market crops distinctly varied from year to year, with higher productivity observed during years with more favorable weather conditions. Moreover, the 10-year application of organic fertilizers, especially GM+MC and FU+FYM, increased the grain yield of all studied market crops except maize and field peas in comparison with GM. The simplified soil surface nitrogen (N) balance estimation revealed large differences between the fertilization systems. The GM treatments showed a highly positive N balance (196–374 kg N ha−1 a−1) due to N retention in the aboveground biomass of lucerne and assumed minimal gaseous ammonia losses (GM and GM+MC) as well as high N input via compost fertilization (GM+MC). Regarding yield stability, the study found that organic fertilization systems only affected the variability of DM in WWL, with the highest variability observed in the FU+FYM system. In conclusion, the study suggests that GM+MC (FS2) and FU+FYM (FS3) have potential for improving crop productivity and nutrient values in organic farming, based on findings from a 10-year investigation. Moreover, during the study period, no adverse effects of a diversified farming system without livestock (FS2: GM+MC) were observed during the study period compared to a manure-based farming system with livestock (FS3: FU+FYM).
有机肥系统对苜蓿和市场作物产量和产量变异的影响:来自奥地利10年田间试验的见解
有机施肥的十年效应已被证明可提高作物产量并促进可持续农业生产力,尽管这些效益的程度可能因具体条件和管理做法而异。为了研究不同有机施肥方式的影响,本研究在10年的时间里,研究了饲养和无畜有机肥系统对奥地利东部苜蓿和市场作物(如谷物玉米、春大麦、大田豌豆、冬黑麦、苜蓿后冬小麦(WWL)和豌豆后冬小麦(WWP))产量和产量变异的影响。本研究对连续施用有机肥的3种有机肥系统进行了试验:FS1:不施用牲畜,只施用苜蓿绿肥;FS2:不含牲畜、苜蓿绿肥和城市堆肥(GM+MC);FS3:与牲畜、苜蓿草料使用和农家肥施用(FU+FYM)。研究发现,苜蓿的干物质(DM)和市场作物的粮食产量逐年变化明显,在气候条件较好的年份,产量较高。此外,施用10年有机肥,特别是GM+MC和FU+FYM,除玉米和大田豌豆外,所有研究的市场作物的粮食产量都比GM增加。简化的土壤表面氮(N)平衡估算显示,施肥系统之间存在较大差异。转基因处理表现出高度正氮平衡(196-374 kg N ha−1 a−1),这是由于苜蓿地上生物量的氮保留,并且假设最小的气态氨损失(GM和GM+MC)以及通过堆肥施肥(GM+MC)的高氮输入。在产量稳定性方面,研究发现有机肥系统仅影响WWL中DM的变异性,其中FU+FYM系统的变异性最大。总之,基于一项为期10年的调查结果,本研究表明GM+MC (FS2)和FU+FYM (FS3)具有提高有机农业作物生产力和营养价值的潜力。此外,在研究期间,与以粪便为基础的养殖系统(FS3: FU+FYM)相比,研究期间未观察到无牲畜的多样化养殖系统(FS2: GM+MC)的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信