Performance of first-trimester fetal nuchal translucency, ductus venosus, tricuspid regurgitation in diagnosing congenital heart defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.6 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Behnaz Moradi , Payam Jannatdoust , Paria Shafiekhani , Mohamadreza Tahamtan , Gita Manzari Tavakoli , Parya Valizadeh , Pouya Ebrahimi , Niloofarsadaat Eshaghhosseiny , Farzan Moodi , Hamed Ghorani , Parisa Kohnepoushi , Mahshad Razaghi , Morteza Sanei Taheri , Delaram J. Ghadimi
{"title":"Performance of first-trimester fetal nuchal translucency, ductus venosus, tricuspid regurgitation in diagnosing congenital heart defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Behnaz Moradi ,&nbsp;Payam Jannatdoust ,&nbsp;Paria Shafiekhani ,&nbsp;Mohamadreza Tahamtan ,&nbsp;Gita Manzari Tavakoli ,&nbsp;Parya Valizadeh ,&nbsp;Pouya Ebrahimi ,&nbsp;Niloofarsadaat Eshaghhosseiny ,&nbsp;Farzan Moodi ,&nbsp;Hamed Ghorani ,&nbsp;Parisa Kohnepoushi ,&nbsp;Mahshad Razaghi ,&nbsp;Morteza Sanei Taheri ,&nbsp;Delaram J. Ghadimi","doi":"10.1016/j.ppedcard.2025.101833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the main cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Nuchal Translucency (NT), Ductus Venosus (DV), and Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) have shown potential in CHD detection.</div></div><div><h3>Aim of review</h3><div>We evaluated the pooled diagnostic test accuracy of these markers during the first-trimester screening.</div></div><div><h3>Key scientific concepts of review</h3><div>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched. A bivariate random effects model created Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curves and the pooled sensitivities and specificities. Forty-two studies were included. For major CHDs, the pooled sensitivities and specificities were 43.1 % (95 % CI: 35.0 %–51.6 %) and 95.5 % (95 % CI: 93.5 %–96.9 %) for A/R DV a wave, 57.8 % (95 % CI: 43.3 %–71.0 %) and 88.8 % (95 % CI: 77.7 %–94.7 %) for abnormal DV-PIV, 37.0 % (95 % CI: 26.6 %–48.6 %) and 97.7 % (95 % CI: 94.6 %–99.1 %) for TR, 41.4 % (95 % CI: 23.2 %–62.2 %) and 93.7 % (95 % CI: 92.7 %–94.6 %) for NT &gt; 95th percentile, and 26.6 % (95 % CI: 11.0 %–51.7 %) and 98.3 % (95 % CI: 97.5 %–98.9 %) for NT &gt; 99th percentile. For the combined models in detecting major CHDs, the highest specificity of 97.8 % (95 % CI: 93.9 %–99.2 %) belonged to NT &gt; 95th percentile and A/R DV a wave. The most sensitive tests were the combination of NT &gt; 95th percentile or A/R DV a wave or TR 61.4 % (95 % CI: 49.7 %–71.9 %). Combining increased NT with the presence of A/R a-wave can help diagnose CHD, while normal NT, A/R DV a wave, and TR indicate lower CHD risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46028,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101833"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058981325000256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the main cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Nuchal Translucency (NT), Ductus Venosus (DV), and Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) have shown potential in CHD detection.

Aim of review

We evaluated the pooled diagnostic test accuracy of these markers during the first-trimester screening.

Key scientific concepts of review

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched. A bivariate random effects model created Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curves and the pooled sensitivities and specificities. Forty-two studies were included. For major CHDs, the pooled sensitivities and specificities were 43.1 % (95 % CI: 35.0 %–51.6 %) and 95.5 % (95 % CI: 93.5 %–96.9 %) for A/R DV a wave, 57.8 % (95 % CI: 43.3 %–71.0 %) and 88.8 % (95 % CI: 77.7 %–94.7 %) for abnormal DV-PIV, 37.0 % (95 % CI: 26.6 %–48.6 %) and 97.7 % (95 % CI: 94.6 %–99.1 %) for TR, 41.4 % (95 % CI: 23.2 %–62.2 %) and 93.7 % (95 % CI: 92.7 %–94.6 %) for NT > 95th percentile, and 26.6 % (95 % CI: 11.0 %–51.7 %) and 98.3 % (95 % CI: 97.5 %–98.9 %) for NT > 99th percentile. For the combined models in detecting major CHDs, the highest specificity of 97.8 % (95 % CI: 93.9 %–99.2 %) belonged to NT > 95th percentile and A/R DV a wave. The most sensitive tests were the combination of NT > 95th percentile or A/R DV a wave or TR 61.4 % (95 % CI: 49.7 %–71.9 %). Combining increased NT with the presence of A/R a-wave can help diagnose CHD, while normal NT, A/R DV a wave, and TR indicate lower CHD risk.
早期妊娠胎儿颈透明、静脉导管、三尖瓣反流诊断先天性心脏缺陷的表现:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景先天性心脏病(CHD)是围产期发病和死亡的主要原因。颈透明(NT)、静脉导管(DV)和三尖瓣返流(TR)显示出冠心病检测的潜力。回顾目的:我们评估了这些标志物在妊娠早期筛查时的综合诊断测试的准确性。检索了reviewPubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Embase的关键科学概念。双变量随机效应模型建立了总接受者工作特征(SROC)曲线和合并的敏感性和特异性。纳入了42项研究。主要的冠心病,合用的敏感性和特异性分别为43.1% (95% CI: 35.0% - -51.6%)和95.5% (95% CI: 93.5% - -96.9%) / R DV波,57.8% (95% CI: 43.3% - -71.0%)和88.8% (95% CI: 77.7% - -94.7%) DV-PIV异常,37.0% (95% CI: 26.6% - -48.6%)和97.7% (95% CI: 94.6% - -99.1%) TR, 41.4% (95% CI: 23.2% - -62.2%)和93.7% (95% CI: 92.7% - -94.6%) NT祝辞第95个百分位,26.6% (95% CI: 11.0% - -51.7%)和98.3% (95% CI: 97.5% - -98.9%) NT祝辞第99个百分位。在检测主要冠心病的联合模型中,NT >的特异性最高,为97.8% (95% CI: 93.9% ~ 99.2%);95百分位和A/R DV A波。最敏感的试验是NT >联合试验;第95百分位或A/R DV A波或TR 61.4% (95% CI: 49.7% - 71.9%)。NT升高合并A/R A波有助于诊断冠心病,而NT、A/R DV A波和TR正常则提示冠心病风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Pediatric Cardiology is an international journal of review presenting information and experienced opinion of importance in the understanding and management of cardiovascular diseases in children. Each issue is prepared by one or more Guest Editors and reviews a single subject, allowing for comprehensive presentations of complex, multifaceted or rapidly changing topics of clinical and investigative interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信