The utility of computed tomography in idiopathic subglottic stenosis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Sarah Benyo , Radhika Duggal , Rebecca C. Nelson , Paul C. Bryson , Michael S. Benninger , William S. Tierney
{"title":"The utility of computed tomography in idiopathic subglottic stenosis","authors":"Sarah Benyo ,&nbsp;Radhika Duggal ,&nbsp;Rebecca C. Nelson ,&nbsp;Paul C. Bryson ,&nbsp;Michael S. Benninger ,&nbsp;William S. Tierney","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2025.104651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>1) To develop a standardized and reproducible protocol for evaluating airway stenosis on CT imaging. 2) To compare idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) measurements on CT imaging to intraoperative findings and determine the practical value of CT imaging in evaluation of the stenotic airway.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single institution retrospective chart review of patients 18 years of age and older with a diagnosis of iSGS who had surgical intervention for iSGS performed at our institution and CT neck/chest within 6-months of first surgical intervention. We developed a standardized protocol for measuring cross-sectional area of the stenosis and percent stenosis based on CT imaging. Operative reports were queried for percent stenosis for comparison. Accuracy of CT measurements were assessed by interclass correlation coefficients (area of greatest stenosis, <em>r</em> = 0.936; distance below the vocal folds, <em>r</em> = 0.766).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 37 patients were included. One hundred percent were female and 86 % were Caucasian. The average age at first operative intervention was 48 years. The most common imaging modality was CT neck with IV contrast (64 %). The average percent stenosis on imaging was 59 % versus 62 % intraoperatively (<em>p</em> = 0.03). The average difference between percent stenosis on imaging and intraoperatively for each individual patient was 11 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study directly examines the correlation of stenosis measurements on CT to intraoperative airway dimensions in patients with iSGS. Our results demonstrate that imaging may tend to underestimate stenosis by an average of 11 %, and generally correlated with intraoperative findings in 90 % of cases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 4","pages":"Article 104651"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070925000547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

1) To develop a standardized and reproducible protocol for evaluating airway stenosis on CT imaging. 2) To compare idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) measurements on CT imaging to intraoperative findings and determine the practical value of CT imaging in evaluation of the stenotic airway.

Methods

We conducted a single institution retrospective chart review of patients 18 years of age and older with a diagnosis of iSGS who had surgical intervention for iSGS performed at our institution and CT neck/chest within 6-months of first surgical intervention. We developed a standardized protocol for measuring cross-sectional area of the stenosis and percent stenosis based on CT imaging. Operative reports were queried for percent stenosis for comparison. Accuracy of CT measurements were assessed by interclass correlation coefficients (area of greatest stenosis, r = 0.936; distance below the vocal folds, r = 0.766).

Results

A total of 37 patients were included. One hundred percent were female and 86 % were Caucasian. The average age at first operative intervention was 48 years. The most common imaging modality was CT neck with IV contrast (64 %). The average percent stenosis on imaging was 59 % versus 62 % intraoperatively (p = 0.03). The average difference between percent stenosis on imaging and intraoperatively for each individual patient was 11 %.

Conclusion

This study directly examines the correlation of stenosis measurements on CT to intraoperative airway dimensions in patients with iSGS. Our results demonstrate that imaging may tend to underestimate stenosis by an average of 11 %, and generally correlated with intraoperative findings in 90 % of cases.
计算机断层扫描在特发性声门下狭窄中的应用
目的1)建立一套标准化、可重复的气道狭窄CT评价方案。2)比较特发性声门下狭窄(idiopathic subglottic stenosis, iSGS)的CT影像与术中表现,确定CT影像在评价气道狭窄中的实用价值。方法:我们对18岁及以上诊断为iSGS的患者进行了单机构回顾性图表回顾,这些患者在本院进行了iSGS手术干预,并在首次手术干预后6个月内进行了颈部/胸部CT检查。我们开发了一个标准化的方案来测量狭窄的横截面积和狭窄的百分比基于CT成像。查询手术报告中狭窄的百分比进行比较。通过类间相关系数(最大狭窄面积,r = 0.936;声带以下距离,r = 0.766)。结果共纳入37例患者。100%是女性,86%是白种人。首次手术干预的平均年龄为48岁。最常见的影像学方式是颈部CT加静脉造影剂(64%)。影像学上狭窄的平均百分比为59%,术中为62% (p = 0.03)。每位患者影像学和术中狭窄的平均差异为11%。结论本研究直接探讨了iSGS患者CT狭窄测量与术中气道尺寸的相关性。我们的研究结果表明,成像可能倾向于平均低估11%的狭窄,并且在90%的病例中通常与术中发现相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信