Lorena Natalino Haber Garcia , Sthéfany da Cunha Dias , Leticia Roberta Martins Costa , Rafaela de Melo Tavares , Rafaela da Silva Rodrigues , Monique Ribeiro Tiba-Casas , Marcus Vinicius Coutinho Cossi , Luís Augusto Nero , Ricardo Seiti Yamatogi
{"title":"Cross-contamination and antimicrobial resistance in diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. from a mixed bovine and swine slaughterhouse","authors":"Lorena Natalino Haber Garcia , Sthéfany da Cunha Dias , Leticia Roberta Martins Costa , Rafaela de Melo Tavares , Rafaela da Silva Rodrigues , Monique Ribeiro Tiba-Casas , Marcus Vinicius Coutinho Cossi , Luís Augusto Nero , Ricardo Seiti Yamatogi","doi":"10.1016/j.foodcont.2025.111406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mixed abattoirs, where swine and beef cattle are processed in the same facility, are common in Brazil. This practice can increase the risk of cross-contamination because of the similar slaughter steps used for both species, potentially resulting in contaminated and unsafe final products. This study investigated routes of cross-contamination in a mixed-species slaughterhouse processing both beef cattle and swine. Diarrheagenic <em>Escherichia coli</em> (DEC) and <em>Salmonella</em> were examined at various stages of the slaughter process. Pathotypes, Shiga toxin subtypes, phylogroups, and serogroups O157, O104, and the “big six” were identified in <em>E. coli</em> isolates. <em>Salmonella</em> isolates were screened for eight virulence genes (<em>pefA, spvC, sipA, sopB, sefA, spaN, pagC</em>, and <em>spvB</em>). All isolates were tested for antimicrobial resistance via breakpoint assays against amoxicillin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ceftiofur, and ciprofloxacin. In total, 597 <em>E. coli</em> isolates were obtained, of which 33 were identified as DEC. Among these, 58 % were classified as Shiga toxin-producing <em>E. coli</em> (STEC), 30 % as enteropathogenic <em>E. coli</em> (EPEC), 6 % as enterohemorrhagic <em>E. coli</em> (EHEC), and 6 % as enterotoxigenic <em>E. coli</em> (ETEC). Of the 21 STEC isolates subjected to polymerase chain reaction for gene detection, 52.4 % harbored <em>stx1</em>, 66.6 % <em>stx2</em>, and 14.3 % both, with <em>stx1a</em>, <em>stx2c</em>, and <em>stx2d</em> being the most frequent subtypes. Phylogroup B1 was the most commonly identified. Seventeen <em>Salmonella</em> isolates—<em>S</em>. Tennessee, S. 4,5,12:i: , and rugose <em>S</em>. <em>enterica</em>—were recovered, with 12 from swine and 5 from cattle. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis revealed evidence of cross-contamination during swine slaughter (post-bleeding, scalding, and evisceration) and circulation of the same serovars between cattle and swine. These findings indicate that cross-contamination can occur at multiple stages within the slaughterhouse process, particularly in mixed-species facilities where such risks are amplified.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":319,"journal":{"name":"Food Control","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 111406"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Control","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713525002750","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mixed abattoirs, where swine and beef cattle are processed in the same facility, are common in Brazil. This practice can increase the risk of cross-contamination because of the similar slaughter steps used for both species, potentially resulting in contaminated and unsafe final products. This study investigated routes of cross-contamination in a mixed-species slaughterhouse processing both beef cattle and swine. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) and Salmonella were examined at various stages of the slaughter process. Pathotypes, Shiga toxin subtypes, phylogroups, and serogroups O157, O104, and the “big six” were identified in E. coli isolates. Salmonella isolates were screened for eight virulence genes (pefA, spvC, sipA, sopB, sefA, spaN, pagC, and spvB). All isolates were tested for antimicrobial resistance via breakpoint assays against amoxicillin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ceftiofur, and ciprofloxacin. In total, 597 E. coli isolates were obtained, of which 33 were identified as DEC. Among these, 58 % were classified as Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), 30 % as enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), 6 % as enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), and 6 % as enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC). Of the 21 STEC isolates subjected to polymerase chain reaction for gene detection, 52.4 % harbored stx1, 66.6 % stx2, and 14.3 % both, with stx1a, stx2c, and stx2d being the most frequent subtypes. Phylogroup B1 was the most commonly identified. Seventeen Salmonella isolates—S. Tennessee, S. 4,5,12:i: , and rugose S. enterica—were recovered, with 12 from swine and 5 from cattle. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis revealed evidence of cross-contamination during swine slaughter (post-bleeding, scalding, and evisceration) and circulation of the same serovars between cattle and swine. These findings indicate that cross-contamination can occur at multiple stages within the slaughterhouse process, particularly in mixed-species facilities where such risks are amplified.
期刊介绍:
Food Control is an international journal that provides essential information for those involved in food safety and process control.
Food Control covers the below areas that relate to food process control or to food safety of human foods:
• Microbial food safety and antimicrobial systems
• Mycotoxins
• Hazard analysis, HACCP and food safety objectives
• Risk assessment, including microbial and chemical hazards
• Quality assurance
• Good manufacturing practices
• Food process systems design and control
• Food Packaging technology and materials in contact with foods
• Rapid methods of analysis and detection, including sensor technology
• Codes of practice, legislation and international harmonization
• Consumer issues
• Education, training and research needs.
The scope of Food Control is comprehensive and includes original research papers, authoritative reviews, short communications, comment articles that report on new developments in food control, and position papers.