Massara Mzid , Maha Ben Jemaa , Khansa Chaabouni , Fatma Ayedi , Zouheir Sahnoun , Tarek Rebai
{"title":"Comparison between the effect of ethanolic extract of Urtica urens L. and bisphosphonate in the treatment of induced osteoporosis in rats","authors":"Massara Mzid , Maha Ben Jemaa , Khansa Chaabouni , Fatma Ayedi , Zouheir Sahnoun , Tarek Rebai","doi":"10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We were interested in this work to make a comparison between the protective effect of the ethanolic extract of <em>Urtica urens</em> L. (UU) and the effect of the bisphosphonate (BP) against osteoporosis induced in rats by intraperitoneal (IP) and oral (gavage) administration. The female rats were ovariectomized to cause osteoporosis. Several biological, histological, and histomorphometric analyses were used to study bone development. The results indicate that the EtOH extract of UU has a positive effect against osteoporosis for both routes of administration (IP and gavage). This effect could be attributed to the high richness of UU leaves in flavonoids, polyphenols, vitamins (vitamin D), and minerals (Ca and P). UU and BP have a histology score at 4 after 12 weeks of ovariectomy and for 60 days. Biological, histological, and histomorphometric studies have shown that UU and BP have significantly similar effects on the treatment of osteoporosis with both routes of administration. This plant could have a lower affinity than BP, possibly related to the dose. On the other hand, we concluded that IP administration is better than oral administration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8966,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 118112"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332225003063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We were interested in this work to make a comparison between the protective effect of the ethanolic extract of Urtica urens L. (UU) and the effect of the bisphosphonate (BP) against osteoporosis induced in rats by intraperitoneal (IP) and oral (gavage) administration. The female rats were ovariectomized to cause osteoporosis. Several biological, histological, and histomorphometric analyses were used to study bone development. The results indicate that the EtOH extract of UU has a positive effect against osteoporosis for both routes of administration (IP and gavage). This effect could be attributed to the high richness of UU leaves in flavonoids, polyphenols, vitamins (vitamin D), and minerals (Ca and P). UU and BP have a histology score at 4 after 12 weeks of ovariectomy and for 60 days. Biological, histological, and histomorphometric studies have shown that UU and BP have significantly similar effects on the treatment of osteoporosis with both routes of administration. This plant could have a lower affinity than BP, possibly related to the dose. On the other hand, we concluded that IP administration is better than oral administration.
期刊介绍:
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy stands as a multidisciplinary journal, presenting a spectrum of original research reports, reviews, and communications in the realms of clinical and basic medicine, as well as pharmacology. The journal spans various fields, including Cancer, Nutriceutics, Neurodegenerative, Cardiac, and Infectious Diseases.