Comparison between the effect of ethanolic extract of Urtica urens L. and bisphosphonate in the treatment of induced osteoporosis in rats

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Massara Mzid , Maha Ben Jemaa , Khansa Chaabouni , Fatma Ayedi , Zouheir Sahnoun , Tarek Rebai
{"title":"Comparison between the effect of ethanolic extract of Urtica urens L. and bisphosphonate in the treatment of induced osteoporosis in rats","authors":"Massara Mzid ,&nbsp;Maha Ben Jemaa ,&nbsp;Khansa Chaabouni ,&nbsp;Fatma Ayedi ,&nbsp;Zouheir Sahnoun ,&nbsp;Tarek Rebai","doi":"10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We were interested in this work to make a comparison between the protective effect of the ethanolic extract of <em>Urtica urens</em> L. (UU) and the effect of the bisphosphonate (BP) against osteoporosis induced in rats by intraperitoneal (IP) and oral (gavage) administration. The female rats were ovariectomized to cause osteoporosis. Several biological, histological, and histomorphometric analyses were used to study bone development. The results indicate that the EtOH extract of UU has a positive effect against osteoporosis for both routes of administration (IP and gavage). This effect could be attributed to the high richness of UU leaves in flavonoids, polyphenols, vitamins (vitamin D), and minerals (Ca and P). UU and BP have a histology score at 4 after 12 weeks of ovariectomy and for 60 days. Biological, histological, and histomorphometric studies have shown that UU and BP have significantly similar effects on the treatment of osteoporosis with both routes of administration. This plant could have a lower affinity than BP, possibly related to the dose. On the other hand, we concluded that IP administration is better than oral administration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8966,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 118112"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332225003063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We were interested in this work to make a comparison between the protective effect of the ethanolic extract of Urtica urens L. (UU) and the effect of the bisphosphonate (BP) against osteoporosis induced in rats by intraperitoneal (IP) and oral (gavage) administration. The female rats were ovariectomized to cause osteoporosis. Several biological, histological, and histomorphometric analyses were used to study bone development. The results indicate that the EtOH extract of UU has a positive effect against osteoporosis for both routes of administration (IP and gavage). This effect could be attributed to the high richness of UU leaves in flavonoids, polyphenols, vitamins (vitamin D), and minerals (Ca and P). UU and BP have a histology score at 4 after 12 weeks of ovariectomy and for 60 days. Biological, histological, and histomorphometric studies have shown that UU and BP have significantly similar effects on the treatment of osteoporosis with both routes of administration. This plant could have a lower affinity than BP, possibly related to the dose. On the other hand, we concluded that IP administration is better than oral administration.
荨麻醇提物与双膦酸盐对大鼠诱导性骨质疏松症的治疗作用比较
本研究旨在比较荨麻醇提物(UU)和双膦酸盐(BP)对大鼠腹腔和灌胃骨质疏松症的保护作用。切除雌性大鼠卵巢,引起骨质疏松。几种生物学、组织学和组织形态计量学分析被用于研究骨发育。结果表明,在给药和灌胃两种给药方式下,UU的EtOH提取物均具有良好的抗骨质疏松作用。这种效果可能归因于UU叶片中黄酮、多酚、维生素(维生素D)和矿物质(钙和磷)的丰富程度。UU和BP在卵巢切除术后12周和60天的组织学评分为4。生物学、组织学和组织形态计量学研究表明,UU和BP两种给药方式在治疗骨质疏松症方面具有显著相似的效果。该植物的亲和力可能低于BP,可能与剂量有关。另一方面,我们得出结论,知识产权管理优于口头管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
2.70%
发文量
1621
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy stands as a multidisciplinary journal, presenting a spectrum of original research reports, reviews, and communications in the realms of clinical and basic medicine, as well as pharmacology. The journal spans various fields, including Cancer, Nutriceutics, Neurodegenerative, Cardiac, and Infectious Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信