Exploration and performance assessment of recuperated rotorcraft powerplant utilizing hydrogen as fuel

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Chengyu Zhang , Guopeng Yu , Youcai Liang , Guorui Ling
{"title":"Exploration and performance assessment of recuperated rotorcraft powerplant utilizing hydrogen as fuel","authors":"Chengyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Guopeng Yu ,&nbsp;Youcai Liang ,&nbsp;Guorui Ling","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address the escalating fuel costs and environmental concerns associated with aviation emissions, this paper presents an integrated multidisciplinary framework to explore the concept of a hydrogen-fueled recuperated rotorcraft powerplant. The overall approach comprises a series of analyses covering rotorcraft flight dynamics, turboshaft engine simulation, hydrogen storage, and recuperator performance. Additionally, design space exploration and weight penalty assessments are conducted within the retrofitted rotorcraft context to evaluate system integration and performance. Comparative studies are performed on various propulsion configurations, including simple and recuperated cycles fueled by kerosene or hydrogen, with a focus on fuel economy and payload capacity. The analysis identifies tank gravimetric efficiency and recuperator thermal effectiveness as critical parameters influencing system weight penalties. Results reveal that the incorporation of recuperator reduces specific fuel consumption (SFC) by 23–44% and 21–41% for kerosene- and hydrogen-fueled engines, respectively. However, at the mission level, hydrogen-powered architectures with recuperators incur energy-to-revenue work ratio (ETRW) penalties exceeding 18% and 21% compared to their kerosene counterparts, at recuperator effectiveness <em>ε<sub>ds</sub></em> of 0.6 and 0.75, respectively. This study establishes the proposed approach as an enabling technology to assess the feasibility of hydrogen as a fuel for rotorcraft powerplants utilizing recuperated engine cycles. The findings contribute to the development of sustainable rotorcraft designs with advanced propulsion configurations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 119872"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425003966","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address the escalating fuel costs and environmental concerns associated with aviation emissions, this paper presents an integrated multidisciplinary framework to explore the concept of a hydrogen-fueled recuperated rotorcraft powerplant. The overall approach comprises a series of analyses covering rotorcraft flight dynamics, turboshaft engine simulation, hydrogen storage, and recuperator performance. Additionally, design space exploration and weight penalty assessments are conducted within the retrofitted rotorcraft context to evaluate system integration and performance. Comparative studies are performed on various propulsion configurations, including simple and recuperated cycles fueled by kerosene or hydrogen, with a focus on fuel economy and payload capacity. The analysis identifies tank gravimetric efficiency and recuperator thermal effectiveness as critical parameters influencing system weight penalties. Results reveal that the incorporation of recuperator reduces specific fuel consumption (SFC) by 23–44% and 21–41% for kerosene- and hydrogen-fueled engines, respectively. However, at the mission level, hydrogen-powered architectures with recuperators incur energy-to-revenue work ratio (ETRW) penalties exceeding 18% and 21% compared to their kerosene counterparts, at recuperator effectiveness εds of 0.6 and 0.75, respectively. This study establishes the proposed approach as an enabling technology to assess the feasibility of hydrogen as a fuel for rotorcraft powerplants utilizing recuperated engine cycles. The findings contribute to the development of sustainable rotorcraft designs with advanced propulsion configurations.
以氢为燃料的回收旋翼机动力装置的探索与性能评价
为了解决不断上升的燃料成本和与航空排放相关的环境问题,本文提出了一个综合的多学科框架来探索氢燃料回收旋翼飞机动力装置的概念。整体方法包括一系列分析,包括旋翼飞机飞行动力学、涡轮轴发动机仿真、储氢和回热器性能。此外,在改装旋翼机的背景下进行设计空间探索和重量损失评估,以评估系统集成和性能。对各种推进配置进行了比较研究,包括以煤油或氢气为燃料的简单和再生循环,重点是燃油经济性和有效载荷能力。分析表明,水箱的重量效率和回热器的热效率是影响系统重量损失的关键参数。结果表明,在煤油和氢燃料发动机中,加入回热器分别降低了23-44%和21-41%的比燃料消耗(SFC)。然而,在任务层面,与煤油相比,带有回热器的氢动力架构的能量收入功比(ETRW)损失分别超过18%和21%,回热器效率εds分别为0.6和0.75。本研究将提出的方法作为一种使能技术来评估利用回收发动机循环将氢作为旋翼飞机动力装置燃料的可行性。这些发现有助于发展具有先进推进配置的可持续旋翼飞机设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信