HIV RNA testing to monitor oral PrEP use does not add clinical value: a real-world cohort study—United States, 2019-2023

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Weiming Zhu, Kevin Delaney, Ya-lin A Huang, Rupa R Patel, Athena P Kourtis, Karen W Hoover
{"title":"HIV RNA testing to monitor oral PrEP use does not add clinical value: a real-world cohort study—United States, 2019-2023","authors":"Weiming Zhu, Kevin Delaney, Ya-lin A Huang, Rupa R Patel, Athena P Kourtis, Karen W Hoover","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The 2021 update of the CDC clinical guidelines for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) recommended both antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) and RNA testing at PrEP initiation and routine follow-up. We assessed real-world utilization and performance of HIV tests among oral PrEP users. Methods An oral PrEP user cohort was constructed using the HealthVerity database that included linked diagnoses, laboratory tests, and prescriptions from December 2018 to August 2023. Data was stratified by guideline pre- (2019−2021) and post-update (2022−2023) periods. For each period, we assessed the agreement between same-day HIV Ag/Ab and RNA results and calculated the false positive rate (FPR) and positive predictive values (PPV) of HIV Ag/Ab and RNA tests compared with adjudicated HIV status. Results The HIV RNA testing rate for follow-up increased from 16 per 100 person-years (PY) to 123 per 100 PYs after the guideline update. The positivity rate of HIV RNA tests decreased from 1.39% to 0.22%. Overall agreement between Ag/Ab and RNA results remained high. The FPRs of HIV Ag/Ab and RNA testing remained similar, but the PPV of HIV RNA testing for PrEP follow-up decreased from 100% to 67%. We estimated that 8,226 to 9,900 RNA tests would be needed for one HIV diagnosis earlier than would be detected with Ag/Ab testing alone. Discussion HIV RNA testing did not provide additional value to Ag/Ab testing during routine follow-up of oral PrEP users. Considering the cost and logistical complexity of HIV RNA testing, its use as a routine test during follow-up of oral PrEP users warrants reconsideration.","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf230","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The 2021 update of the CDC clinical guidelines for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) recommended both antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) and RNA testing at PrEP initiation and routine follow-up. We assessed real-world utilization and performance of HIV tests among oral PrEP users. Methods An oral PrEP user cohort was constructed using the HealthVerity database that included linked diagnoses, laboratory tests, and prescriptions from December 2018 to August 2023. Data was stratified by guideline pre- (2019−2021) and post-update (2022−2023) periods. For each period, we assessed the agreement between same-day HIV Ag/Ab and RNA results and calculated the false positive rate (FPR) and positive predictive values (PPV) of HIV Ag/Ab and RNA tests compared with adjudicated HIV status. Results The HIV RNA testing rate for follow-up increased from 16 per 100 person-years (PY) to 123 per 100 PYs after the guideline update. The positivity rate of HIV RNA tests decreased from 1.39% to 0.22%. Overall agreement between Ag/Ab and RNA results remained high. The FPRs of HIV Ag/Ab and RNA testing remained similar, but the PPV of HIV RNA testing for PrEP follow-up decreased from 100% to 67%. We estimated that 8,226 to 9,900 RNA tests would be needed for one HIV diagnosis earlier than would be detected with Ag/Ab testing alone. Discussion HIV RNA testing did not provide additional value to Ag/Ab testing during routine follow-up of oral PrEP users. Considering the cost and logistical complexity of HIV RNA testing, its use as a routine test during follow-up of oral PrEP users warrants reconsideration.
HIV RNA检测监测口服PrEP使用并未增加临床价值:一项真实世界队列研究-美国,2019-2023
2021年更新的CDC HIV暴露前预防(PrEP)临床指南推荐在PrEP开始和常规随访时进行抗原/抗体(Ag/Ab)和RNA检测。我们评估了口服PrEP使用者中HIV检测的实际使用情况和表现。方法使用HealthVerity数据库构建口腔PrEP用户队列,该数据库包括2018年12月至2023年8月的相关诊断、实验室检查和处方。数据按指南更新前(2019 - 2021)和更新后(2022 - 2023)进行分层。对于每个时期,我们评估了当日HIV Ag/Ab和RNA结果之间的一致性,并计算了HIV Ag/Ab和RNA测试与判定HIV状态相比的假阳性率(FPR)和阳性预测值(PPV)。结果指南更新后,随访HIV RNA检测率从16 / 100人年(PY)上升到123 / 100人年(PY)。HIV RNA检测阳性率由1.39%降至0.22%。Ag/Ab和RNA结果之间的总体一致性仍然很高。HIV Ag/Ab和RNA检测的fpr保持不变,但HIV RNA检测的PPV在PrEP随访中从100%下降到67%。我们估计,与单独进行Ag/Ab检测相比,一次HIV诊断需要进行8,226至9,900次RNA检测。在口服PrEP使用者的常规随访中,HIV RNA检测没有为Ag/Ab检测提供额外的价值。考虑到HIV RNA检测的成本和后勤复杂性,将其作为口服PrEP使用者随访期间的常规检测值得重新考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信