Community Energy Initiatives as drivers for degrowth? An empirical investigation of their alignment with five imperatives of degrowth

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jan Pedro Zeiss, Valeria Jana Schwanitz, August Wierling, Timothy Peter Marcroft, Constantin von Beck, Arnaud Diemer
{"title":"Community Energy Initiatives as drivers for degrowth? An empirical investigation of their alignment with five imperatives of degrowth","authors":"Jan Pedro Zeiss, Valeria Jana Schwanitz, August Wierling, Timothy Peter Marcroft, Constantin von Beck, Arnaud Diemer","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In view of the emerging social, environmental and economic crises, the degrowth movement questions the current growth paradigm. The fundamental criticism put forth by degrowth is that unlimited growth cannot be sustained within the planetary boundaries.Citizen-owned and democratically controlled Community Energy Initiatives (CEI) engage since many years in the sustainable energy transition. This paper investigates to what extent they align with the degrowth movement. Drawing from an inventory of over 10000 European Community Energy Initiatives, we go beyond the few case studies and theoretical think-pieces. We test potential alignment by empirically investigating indicators for the following degrowth imperatives: (1) Reduce environmental impact, (2) Re-orient economic priorities, (3) Reduce inequality (4) Foster democratic decision making, and (5) Re-localize production and consumption. The results suggest a strong alignment with the environmental impact reduction, democratic decision making, and re-localized production and consumption imperatives, while the alignment with the economic re-orientation and inequality reduction imperatives varies considerably across countries and types of initiatives.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145612","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In view of the emerging social, environmental and economic crises, the degrowth movement questions the current growth paradigm. The fundamental criticism put forth by degrowth is that unlimited growth cannot be sustained within the planetary boundaries.Citizen-owned and democratically controlled Community Energy Initiatives (CEI) engage since many years in the sustainable energy transition. This paper investigates to what extent they align with the degrowth movement. Drawing from an inventory of over 10000 European Community Energy Initiatives, we go beyond the few case studies and theoretical think-pieces. We test potential alignment by empirically investigating indicators for the following degrowth imperatives: (1) Reduce environmental impact, (2) Re-orient economic priorities, (3) Reduce inequality (4) Foster democratic decision making, and (5) Re-localize production and consumption. The results suggest a strong alignment with the environmental impact reduction, democratic decision making, and re-localized production and consumption imperatives, while the alignment with the economic re-orientation and inequality reduction imperatives varies considerably across countries and types of initiatives.

Abstract Image

社区能源倡议是去生长的驱动力?对它们与去生长的五个必要条件的一致性进行实证调查
鉴于正在出现的社会、环境和经济危机,反增长运动质疑当前的增长模式。“去增长”提出的基本批评是,无限增长无法在地球边界内维持。公民拥有和民主控制的社区能源倡议(CEI)多年来一直参与可持续能源转型。本文调查了他们在多大程度上与去生长运动相一致。从超过10000个欧洲共同体能源倡议的清单中,我们超越了少数案例研究和理论思考。我们通过实证调查以下指标来检验潜在一致性:(1)减少环境影响,(2)重新定位经济优先事项,(3)减少不平等,(4)促进民主决策,以及(5)重新本地化生产和消费。结果表明,与减少环境影响、民主决策和重新本地化生产和消费的必要性有很强的一致性,而与经济重新定位和减少不平等的必要性的一致性在不同国家和不同类型的倡议中差异很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信