Chandreyee Sengupta, Tom C. Scott, Hao Chen, Hyein Yoon, Yogesh Chandola, Mengtian Li, Gyula I. G. Józsa, O. Ivy Wong, Yin-Zhe Ma, Patricio Lagos, Ruta Kale and Denis Tramonte
{"title":"MeerKAT H i Observations of Low Surface Brightness/Ultradiffuse Galaxy Candidates Projected around Two Southern Loose Groups","authors":"Chandreyee Sengupta, Tom C. Scott, Hao Chen, Hyein Yoon, Yogesh Chandola, Mengtian Li, Gyula I. G. Józsa, O. Ivy Wong, Yin-Zhe Ma, Patricio Lagos, Ruta Kale and Denis Tramonte","doi":"10.3847/2041-8213/adcee1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large catalog of low surface brightness galaxies (LSBGs) from the Dark Energy Survey showed significant clustering around nearby galaxy groups and clusters. Using the HIPASS survey, we tried to determine the redshift of a subsample of these LSBGs and determine whether they were members of the groups they were projected near, but this was hampered by HIPASS’s high spectral rms. This Letter reports on MeerKAT H i observations to determine the redshifts of 52 LSBG candidates projected in the vicinity of two groups from our previous HIPASS study. The main goal is to investigate and ascertain whether these LSBGs are genuine group members. H i was detected with MeerKAT and redshifts were determined for only five of the 52 candidates within a velocity range of ±2500 km s−1 of their respective group velocities. All five H i detections were blue LSBGs, and two of them were confirmed to be ultradiffuse galaxies (UDGs). Both these UDGs were group members, while the other three detections were either foreground or background galaxies. In this Letter we explore scenarios that can explain the 90% nondetection. MeerKAT’s excellent sensitivity allows us to conclude that the majority of the nondetected candidates, particularly the blue galaxies, are not group members but lie at higher redshifts. However, this still leaves the open question of why Tanoglidis LSBG candidates, in particular the red ones, appear to be clustered in projection around nearby groups.","PeriodicalId":501814,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/adcee1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A large catalog of low surface brightness galaxies (LSBGs) from the Dark Energy Survey showed significant clustering around nearby galaxy groups and clusters. Using the HIPASS survey, we tried to determine the redshift of a subsample of these LSBGs and determine whether they were members of the groups they were projected near, but this was hampered by HIPASS’s high spectral rms. This Letter reports on MeerKAT H i observations to determine the redshifts of 52 LSBG candidates projected in the vicinity of two groups from our previous HIPASS study. The main goal is to investigate and ascertain whether these LSBGs are genuine group members. H i was detected with MeerKAT and redshifts were determined for only five of the 52 candidates within a velocity range of ±2500 km s−1 of their respective group velocities. All five H i detections were blue LSBGs, and two of them were confirmed to be ultradiffuse galaxies (UDGs). Both these UDGs were group members, while the other three detections were either foreground or background galaxies. In this Letter we explore scenarios that can explain the 90% nondetection. MeerKAT’s excellent sensitivity allows us to conclude that the majority of the nondetected candidates, particularly the blue galaxies, are not group members but lie at higher redshifts. However, this still leaves the open question of why Tanoglidis LSBG candidates, in particular the red ones, appear to be clustered in projection around nearby groups.
来自暗能量调查的低表面亮度星系(LSBGs)的大目录显示,在附近的星系群和星系团周围有明显的聚集。利用HIPASS巡天,我们试图确定这些lsbg子样本的红移,并确定它们是否属于它们投影附近的群体,但这受到HIPASS高光谱有效值的阻碍。本文报告了MeerKAT H的观测结果,以确定在我们之前的HIPASS研究中两个组附近的52个LSBG候选者的红移。主要目标是调查和确定这些lsbg是否是真正的团体成员。MeerKAT对H进行了检测,在各自群速的±2500 km s−1的速度范围内,52个候选星系中只有5个被确定了红移。所有五个H探测都是蓝色的lsdb,其中两个被证实是超漫射星系(udg)。这两个udg都是星系群的成员,而其他三个探测到的星系要么是前景星系,要么是背景星系。在这封信中,我们探讨了可以解释90%未检测的场景。MeerKAT出色的灵敏度使我们能够得出这样的结论:大多数未被探测到的候选星系,尤其是蓝色星系,不是星系群的成员,而是处于更高的红移。然而,这仍然留下了一个悬而未决的问题,为什么Tanoglidis的lsdb候选者,尤其是红色的,似乎聚集在附近群体的投影中。