Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic medication in relapse prevention after cannabis-induced psychosis

Antti Mustonen, Heidi Taipale, Alexander Denissoff, Venla Ellilä, Marta Di Forti, Antti Tanskanen, Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz, Jari Tiihonen, Solja Niemelä
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic medication in relapse prevention after cannabis-induced psychosis","authors":"Antti Mustonen, Heidi Taipale, Alexander Denissoff, Venla Ellilä, Marta Di Forti, Antti Tanskanen, Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz, Jari Tiihonen, Solja Niemelä","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>Cannabis use is linked to treatment non-adherence and relapses in psychotic disorders. Antipsychotic medication is effective for relapse prevention in primary psychoses, but its effectiveness after cannabis-induced psychosis (CIP) remains unclear.</p><span>Aims</span><p>To examine the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication for relapse prevention following the first clinically diagnosed CIP.</p><span>Method</span><p>A cohort of 1772 patients (84.1% men) with incident CIP was identified from the Swedish National Patient and Micro Data for Analyses of Social Insurance registers. The primary outcome was hospitalisation due to any psychotic episode. Drug use data were collected from the Prescribed Drug Register and modelled into drug use periods using the PRE2DUP method. A within-individual Cox regression model was used to study the risk of outcomes during the use of different oral or long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics compared with non-use.</p><span>Results</span><p>The mean age at first diagnosis was 26.6 years (s.d. = 8.3). Of the cohort, 1343 (75.8%) used antipsychotics and 914 (51.3%) experienced psychosis hospitalisation during the follow-up. Any antipsychotic use was associated with a decreased risk of psychosis hospitalisation (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.75; 95% CI 0.67–0.84). Specific antipsychotics associated with decreased risk included aripiprazole LAI (aHR 0.27; 95% CI 0.14–0.51), olanzapine LAI (aHR 0.28; 95% CI 0.15–0.53), clozapine (aHR 0.55; 95% CI 0.34–0.90), oral aripiprazole (aHR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45–0.91), antipsychotic polytherapy (aHR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63–0.87) and oral olanzapine (aHR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69–0.94).</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>In particular, LAIs, clozapine and oral aripiprazole were associated with a decreased risk of psychosis relapse following CIP. Prescribers should consider using more LAIs for better treatment outcomes after CIP.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cannabis use is linked to treatment non-adherence and relapses in psychotic disorders. Antipsychotic medication is effective for relapse prevention in primary psychoses, but its effectiveness after cannabis-induced psychosis (CIP) remains unclear.

Aims

To examine the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication for relapse prevention following the first clinically diagnosed CIP.

Method

A cohort of 1772 patients (84.1% men) with incident CIP was identified from the Swedish National Patient and Micro Data for Analyses of Social Insurance registers. The primary outcome was hospitalisation due to any psychotic episode. Drug use data were collected from the Prescribed Drug Register and modelled into drug use periods using the PRE2DUP method. A within-individual Cox regression model was used to study the risk of outcomes during the use of different oral or long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics compared with non-use.

Results

The mean age at first diagnosis was 26.6 years (s.d. = 8.3). Of the cohort, 1343 (75.8%) used antipsychotics and 914 (51.3%) experienced psychosis hospitalisation during the follow-up. Any antipsychotic use was associated with a decreased risk of psychosis hospitalisation (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.75; 95% CI 0.67–0.84). Specific antipsychotics associated with decreased risk included aripiprazole LAI (aHR 0.27; 95% CI 0.14–0.51), olanzapine LAI (aHR 0.28; 95% CI 0.15–0.53), clozapine (aHR 0.55; 95% CI 0.34–0.90), oral aripiprazole (aHR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45–0.91), antipsychotic polytherapy (aHR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63–0.87) and oral olanzapine (aHR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69–0.94).

Conclusions

In particular, LAIs, clozapine and oral aripiprazole were associated with a decreased risk of psychosis relapse following CIP. Prescribers should consider using more LAIs for better treatment outcomes after CIP.

抗精神病药物在大麻诱导的精神病复发预防中的实际有效性
背景:大麻的使用与精神病治疗的不依从性和复发有关。抗精神病药物对预防原发性精神病复发有效,但其在大麻诱导精神病(CIP)后的有效性尚不清楚。目的探讨抗精神病药物预防首次临床诊断的CIP复发的有效性。方法从瑞典国家患者和社会保险登记的微观数据分析中确定1772例发生CIP的患者(84.1%为男性)。主要结局是因任何精神病发作而住院。药物使用数据从处方药登记册中收集,并使用PRE2DUP方法建模成药物使用周期。采用个体内Cox回归模型研究使用不同口服或长效注射(LAI)抗精神病药物与未使用抗精神病药物的预后风险。结果患者初诊平均年龄26.6岁(sd = 8.3)。在该队列中,1343人(75.8%)使用抗精神病药物,914人(51.3%)在随访期间经历精神病住院治疗。任何抗精神病药物的使用都与精神病住院风险的降低相关(校正风险比(aHR) 0.75;95% ci 0.67-0.84)。与风险降低相关的特定抗精神病药物包括阿立哌唑LAI (aHR 0.27;95% CI 0.14-0.51),奥氮平LAI (aHR 0.28;95% CI 0.15-0.53),氯氮平(aHR 0.55;95% CI 0.34-0.90),口服阿立哌唑(aHR 0.64;95% CI 0.45-0.91),抗精神病综合治疗(aHR 0.74;95% CI 0.63-0.87)和口服奥氮平(aHR 0.81;95% ci 0.69-0.94)。结论LAIs、氯氮平和口服阿立哌唑与CIP后精神病复发风险降低相关。处方者应考虑在CIP后使用更多的lai以获得更好的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信