Vertical Load-Carrying Capacity-Based Functionality Fragility Curve (VLCC-FFC) for Physics-Enhanced Probabilistic Seismic Resilience Assessment of Bridges: Methodology and Application

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jingcheng Wang, Aijun Ye, Xiaowei Wang, Yue Li
{"title":"Vertical Load-Carrying Capacity-Based Functionality Fragility Curve (VLCC-FFC) for Physics-Enhanced Probabilistic Seismic Resilience Assessment of Bridges: Methodology and Application","authors":"Jingcheng Wang,&nbsp;Aijun Ye,&nbsp;Xiaowei Wang,&nbsp;Yue Li","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Current practices for estimating postearthquake functionality of a bridge typically rely on assessing the physical damage and are often determined based on empirical engineering judgements. This approach can introduce significant variability in functionality estimates, further reducing the confidence level in probabilistic resilience assessment used for decision-making. To address this issue, this study develops a physics-enhanced probabilistic seismic resilience framework for bridges. In this framework, postevent functionality is physically evaluated by quantifying the loss of vertical load-carrying capacity (VLCC) using incremental dynamic analysis followed by pushdown analysis. A novel concept named VLCC-based functionality fragility curve (VLCC-FFC) is proposed. The VLCC-FFC represents the probability that the loss of VLCC will exceed a specific functionality state (FS, defined based on the level of VLCC loss) at a given seismic intensity measure. Furthermore, joint probability density functions (JPDFs) of VLCC loss and physical damage measures (e.g., residual drift ratio of a column) are developed for each FS to facilitate the probabilistic assessment of postevent residual functionality and the corresponding recovery process. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a case study of pile-shaft–supported girder bridges subjected to earthquakes and liquefaction-induced transverse spreading. The developed JPDFs for VLCC loss and residual drift ratio are available for implementation at https://bit.ly/JW912.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 7","pages":"1894-1911"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current practices for estimating postearthquake functionality of a bridge typically rely on assessing the physical damage and are often determined based on empirical engineering judgements. This approach can introduce significant variability in functionality estimates, further reducing the confidence level in probabilistic resilience assessment used for decision-making. To address this issue, this study develops a physics-enhanced probabilistic seismic resilience framework for bridges. In this framework, postevent functionality is physically evaluated by quantifying the loss of vertical load-carrying capacity (VLCC) using incremental dynamic analysis followed by pushdown analysis. A novel concept named VLCC-based functionality fragility curve (VLCC-FFC) is proposed. The VLCC-FFC represents the probability that the loss of VLCC will exceed a specific functionality state (FS, defined based on the level of VLCC loss) at a given seismic intensity measure. Furthermore, joint probability density functions (JPDFs) of VLCC loss and physical damage measures (e.g., residual drift ratio of a column) are developed for each FS to facilitate the probabilistic assessment of postevent residual functionality and the corresponding recovery process. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a case study of pile-shaft–supported girder bridges subjected to earthquakes and liquefaction-induced transverse spreading. The developed JPDFs for VLCC loss and residual drift ratio are available for implementation at https://bit.ly/JW912.

基于垂直承载能力的功能易损性曲线(VLCC-FFC)物理增强桥梁概率地震回弹评估:方法与应用
目前估算桥梁震后功能的做法通常依赖于评估物理损伤,并且通常基于经验工程判断来确定。这种方法可以在功能估计中引入显著的可变性,进一步降低用于决策的概率弹性评估的置信度。为了解决这个问题,本研究开发了一种物理增强的桥梁概率地震弹性框架。在此框架中,通过使用增量动态分析和下推分析量化垂直承载能力(VLCC)的损失,对事件后功能进行物理评估。提出了基于vlcc的功能脆弱性曲线(VLCC-FFC)的概念。VLCC- ffc表示在给定的地震烈度测量下,VLCC的损失超过特定功能状态(FS,根据VLCC的损失水平定义)的概率。此外,为每个FS建立了VLCC损失和物理损伤措施(如柱的残余漂移比)的联合概率密度函数(jpdf),以方便事后残余功能和相应恢复过程的概率评估。通过地震和液化引起的横向扩展的桩-轴支撑梁桥的实例研究证明了所提出的框架。开发的VLCC损耗和剩余漂移比的jpdf可在https://bit.ly/JW912上实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信