Results of an International Comparison of Indoor Photovoltaic Measurements Among Seven Metrological Institutes

IF 6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Solar RRL Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1002/solr.202400855
Afsaneh Eghbali, Petri Kärhä, Erkki Ikonen, Ingo Kröger, Yean-San Long, Min-An Tsai, Karsten Bothe, David Hinken, Özcan Bazkir, Jimmy Dubard, Pierre Betis, George Koutsourakis, James Blakesley, Daniel E. Parsons, Stefan Winter
{"title":"Results of an International Comparison of Indoor Photovoltaic Measurements Among Seven Metrological Institutes","authors":"Afsaneh Eghbali,&nbsp;Petri Kärhä,&nbsp;Erkki Ikonen,&nbsp;Ingo Kröger,&nbsp;Yean-San Long,&nbsp;Min-An Tsai,&nbsp;Karsten Bothe,&nbsp;David Hinken,&nbsp;Özcan Bazkir,&nbsp;Jimmy Dubard,&nbsp;Pierre Betis,&nbsp;George Koutsourakis,&nbsp;James Blakesley,&nbsp;Daniel E. Parsons,&nbsp;Stefan Winter","doi":"10.1002/solr.202400855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study presents results of an intercomparison of indoor photovoltaics (PVs) among seven metrological institutes. Three types of solar cells were measured; organic and amorphous silicon cells representing current indoor products in the market and a reference solar cell. Three different light sources—AM1.5G, International Commission of Illumination Standard Illuminant A, and light-emitting diodes (LED) L41—were used at illuminance levels 100–2000 lx. Each laboratory reported short-circuit current as mandatory. Open-circuit voltage, maximum power, and differential spectral responsivity were reported where possible. Measurements revealed notable discrepancies. At the 1000 lx level, best agreement of 7% as standard deviation was achieved for the amorphous silicon cell using Standard Illuminant A. Similarly, the worst agreement of 37% was found for the reference cell using AM1.5G. Measurement methods varied across the laboratories. Some participants used lamps for Standard Illuminant A and LED L41. These measurements were generally in agreement but deviated from measurements with LED-based solar simulators, due to differences in measurement geometry, spectral properties, and treatment of infrared. Different illuminance measurement approaches, using either calibrated reference cells or luxmeters, further impacted consistency. This study highlights need for harmonized procedures to support reliable performance assessment of indoor PVs and gives recommendations to account for in standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":230,"journal":{"name":"Solar RRL","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar RRL","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/solr.202400855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents results of an intercomparison of indoor photovoltaics (PVs) among seven metrological institutes. Three types of solar cells were measured; organic and amorphous silicon cells representing current indoor products in the market and a reference solar cell. Three different light sources—AM1.5G, International Commission of Illumination Standard Illuminant A, and light-emitting diodes (LED) L41—were used at illuminance levels 100–2000 lx. Each laboratory reported short-circuit current as mandatory. Open-circuit voltage, maximum power, and differential spectral responsivity were reported where possible. Measurements revealed notable discrepancies. At the 1000 lx level, best agreement of 7% as standard deviation was achieved for the amorphous silicon cell using Standard Illuminant A. Similarly, the worst agreement of 37% was found for the reference cell using AM1.5G. Measurement methods varied across the laboratories. Some participants used lamps for Standard Illuminant A and LED L41. These measurements were generally in agreement but deviated from measurements with LED-based solar simulators, due to differences in measurement geometry, spectral properties, and treatment of infrared. Different illuminance measurement approaches, using either calibrated reference cells or luxmeters, further impacted consistency. This study highlights need for harmonized procedures to support reliable performance assessment of indoor PVs and gives recommendations to account for in standards.

Abstract Image

七个计量机构室内光伏测量的国际比较结果
本研究提出了室内光伏(pv)在七个计量机构之间的相互比较的结果。测量了三种类型的太阳能电池;有机和非晶硅电池代表目前市场上的室内产品和参考太阳能电池。三种不同的光源——am1.5 g、国际照明标准委员会光源A和发光二极管(LED) l41——在100-2000 lx的照度水平上使用。每个实验室都必须报告短路电流。开路电压,最大功率和差分光谱响应率在可能的情况下被报道。测量结果显示了显著的差异。在1000 lx水平下,使用标准光源a的非晶硅电池达到了7%的最佳一致性标准偏差。同样,使用AM1.5G的参比电池达到了37%的最差一致性。各个实验室的测量方法各不相同。一些参与者使用标准光源A和LED L41的灯。这些测量结果大致一致,但由于测量几何形状、光谱特性和红外处理的差异,与基于led的太阳模拟器的测量结果有所偏差。不同的照度测量方法,使用校准的参考细胞或亮度计,进一步影响一致性。本研究强调需要协调一致的程序来支持室内pv的可靠性能评估,并提出了在标准中考虑的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Solar RRL
Solar RRL Physics and Astronomy-Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
460
期刊介绍: Solar RRL, formerly known as Rapid Research Letters, has evolved to embrace a broader and more encompassing format. We publish Research Articles and Reviews covering all facets of solar energy conversion. This includes, but is not limited to, photovoltaics and solar cells (both established and emerging systems), as well as the development, characterization, and optimization of materials and devices. Additionally, we cover topics such as photovoltaic modules and systems, their installation and deployment, photocatalysis, solar fuels, photothermal and photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion, energy distribution, grid issues, and other relevant aspects. Join us in exploring the latest advancements in solar energy conversion research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信