Afsaneh Eghbali, Petri Kärhä, Erkki Ikonen, Ingo Kröger, Yean-San Long, Min-An Tsai, Karsten Bothe, David Hinken, Özcan Bazkir, Jimmy Dubard, Pierre Betis, George Koutsourakis, James Blakesley, Daniel E. Parsons, Stefan Winter
{"title":"Results of an International Comparison of Indoor Photovoltaic Measurements Among Seven Metrological Institutes","authors":"Afsaneh Eghbali, Petri Kärhä, Erkki Ikonen, Ingo Kröger, Yean-San Long, Min-An Tsai, Karsten Bothe, David Hinken, Özcan Bazkir, Jimmy Dubard, Pierre Betis, George Koutsourakis, James Blakesley, Daniel E. Parsons, Stefan Winter","doi":"10.1002/solr.202400855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study presents results of an intercomparison of indoor photovoltaics (PVs) among seven metrological institutes. Three types of solar cells were measured; organic and amorphous silicon cells representing current indoor products in the market and a reference solar cell. Three different light sources—AM1.5G, International Commission of Illumination Standard Illuminant A, and light-emitting diodes (LED) L41—were used at illuminance levels 100–2000 lx. Each laboratory reported short-circuit current as mandatory. Open-circuit voltage, maximum power, and differential spectral responsivity were reported where possible. Measurements revealed notable discrepancies. At the 1000 lx level, best agreement of 7% as standard deviation was achieved for the amorphous silicon cell using Standard Illuminant A. Similarly, the worst agreement of 37% was found for the reference cell using AM1.5G. Measurement methods varied across the laboratories. Some participants used lamps for Standard Illuminant A and LED L41. These measurements were generally in agreement but deviated from measurements with LED-based solar simulators, due to differences in measurement geometry, spectral properties, and treatment of infrared. Different illuminance measurement approaches, using either calibrated reference cells or luxmeters, further impacted consistency. This study highlights need for harmonized procedures to support reliable performance assessment of indoor PVs and gives recommendations to account for in standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":230,"journal":{"name":"Solar RRL","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar RRL","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/solr.202400855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents results of an intercomparison of indoor photovoltaics (PVs) among seven metrological institutes. Three types of solar cells were measured; organic and amorphous silicon cells representing current indoor products in the market and a reference solar cell. Three different light sources—AM1.5G, International Commission of Illumination Standard Illuminant A, and light-emitting diodes (LED) L41—were used at illuminance levels 100–2000 lx. Each laboratory reported short-circuit current as mandatory. Open-circuit voltage, maximum power, and differential spectral responsivity were reported where possible. Measurements revealed notable discrepancies. At the 1000 lx level, best agreement of 7% as standard deviation was achieved for the amorphous silicon cell using Standard Illuminant A. Similarly, the worst agreement of 37% was found for the reference cell using AM1.5G. Measurement methods varied across the laboratories. Some participants used lamps for Standard Illuminant A and LED L41. These measurements were generally in agreement but deviated from measurements with LED-based solar simulators, due to differences in measurement geometry, spectral properties, and treatment of infrared. Different illuminance measurement approaches, using either calibrated reference cells or luxmeters, further impacted consistency. This study highlights need for harmonized procedures to support reliable performance assessment of indoor PVs and gives recommendations to account for in standards.
Solar RRLPhysics and Astronomy-Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
460
期刊介绍:
Solar RRL, formerly known as Rapid Research Letters, has evolved to embrace a broader and more encompassing format. We publish Research Articles and Reviews covering all facets of solar energy conversion. This includes, but is not limited to, photovoltaics and solar cells (both established and emerging systems), as well as the development, characterization, and optimization of materials and devices. Additionally, we cover topics such as photovoltaic modules and systems, their installation and deployment, photocatalysis, solar fuels, photothermal and photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion, energy distribution, grid issues, and other relevant aspects. Join us in exploring the latest advancements in solar energy conversion research.