Stool Microbiome Features and Weight Change Response to Treatment for cancer cachexia

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Rima Nasrah, Mary Kanbalian, Christina Van Der Borch, Ken Dewar, Stéphanie Chevalier, R. Thomas Jagoe
{"title":"Stool Microbiome Features and Weight Change Response to Treatment for cancer cachexia","authors":"Rima Nasrah,&nbsp;Mary Kanbalian,&nbsp;Christina Van Der Borch,&nbsp;Ken Dewar,&nbsp;Stéphanie Chevalier,&nbsp;R. Thomas Jagoe","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer cachexia is characterised by significant weight loss and muscle wasting that adversely affects patient outcomes. Nutritional interventions in cancer cachexia leads to improved outcomes, including improved weight change. However, there are wide variations in weight response to dietary interventions. Thus, it remains difficult to predict response to a given increase in dietary intake at an individual patient level. This study aimed to identify gut microbiome features that could serve as potential predictive biomarkers for response to individualized dietary intervention in patients with cancer cachexia attending the McGill Cancer Nutrition-Rehabilitation Program at the Jewish General Hospital (CNR-JGH).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were recruited from CNR-JGH clinic. Interventions included individualized nutritional counselling by a registered dietitian, to increase energy and protein intake to meet recommended levels. Stool DNA samples were collected at baseline (V1) and visit 2 (V2), and gut microbiome profiles were analysed to assess microbial diversity and identify differentially abundant genera in patients who lost weight (WL, <i>N</i> = 8) vs. maintained/gained weight (WSG, <i>N</i> = 29) at subsequent CNR-JGH clinic visits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Greater alpha-diversity and higher <i>Lachnospira</i> genus abundance at baseline predicted higher likelihood that patients would have good response to CNR-JGH intervention (WSG at V2). Though predictors of poor response to nutritional intervention (WL at V2) were not identified, subjects in the WL group exhibited lower alpha-diversity and greater microbial population instability after CNR-JGH interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this cohort of patients with cancer-related weight loss attending a cancer cachexia clinic, certain gut microbiome features were associated with response to dietary interventions. Patients who lost weight after CNR-JGH intervention also developed a less diverse and less stable gut microbiome. <i>Lachnospira</i> genus abundance is a potential predictor of positive weight change response to dietary intervention as part of multimodal care for cancer cachexia, and further confirmatory studies are warranted. In addition, targeted dietary approaches to maintain diversity and gut microbiome population stability may have a role in improving the response to dietary interventions in cancer cachexia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13816","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13816","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Cancer cachexia is characterised by significant weight loss and muscle wasting that adversely affects patient outcomes. Nutritional interventions in cancer cachexia leads to improved outcomes, including improved weight change. However, there are wide variations in weight response to dietary interventions. Thus, it remains difficult to predict response to a given increase in dietary intake at an individual patient level. This study aimed to identify gut microbiome features that could serve as potential predictive biomarkers for response to individualized dietary intervention in patients with cancer cachexia attending the McGill Cancer Nutrition-Rehabilitation Program at the Jewish General Hospital (CNR-JGH).

Methods

Participants were recruited from CNR-JGH clinic. Interventions included individualized nutritional counselling by a registered dietitian, to increase energy and protein intake to meet recommended levels. Stool DNA samples were collected at baseline (V1) and visit 2 (V2), and gut microbiome profiles were analysed to assess microbial diversity and identify differentially abundant genera in patients who lost weight (WL, N = 8) vs. maintained/gained weight (WSG, N = 29) at subsequent CNR-JGH clinic visits.

Results

Greater alpha-diversity and higher Lachnospira genus abundance at baseline predicted higher likelihood that patients would have good response to CNR-JGH intervention (WSG at V2). Though predictors of poor response to nutritional intervention (WL at V2) were not identified, subjects in the WL group exhibited lower alpha-diversity and greater microbial population instability after CNR-JGH interventions.

Conclusions

In this cohort of patients with cancer-related weight loss attending a cancer cachexia clinic, certain gut microbiome features were associated with response to dietary interventions. Patients who lost weight after CNR-JGH intervention also developed a less diverse and less stable gut microbiome. Lachnospira genus abundance is a potential predictor of positive weight change response to dietary intervention as part of multimodal care for cancer cachexia, and further confirmatory studies are warranted. In addition, targeted dietary approaches to maintain diversity and gut microbiome population stability may have a role in improving the response to dietary interventions in cancer cachexia.

Abstract Image

粪便微生物特征和体重变化对癌症恶病质治疗的反应
背景和目的癌症恶病质的特点是显著的体重减轻和肌肉萎缩,对患者的预后产生不利影响。营养干预癌症恶病质导致改善的结果,包括改善体重变化。然而,体重对饮食干预的反应存在很大差异。因此,在个体患者水平上预测对给定饮食摄入量增加的反应仍然很困难。本研究旨在确定肠道微生物组特征,这些特征可以作为潜在的预测性生物标志物,用于参加犹太总医院(CNR-JGH)麦吉尔癌症营养康复计划的癌症恶病质患者对个性化饮食干预的反应。方法从CNR-JGH诊所招募研究对象。干预措施包括由注册营养师提供个性化营养咨询,以增加能量和蛋白质摄入量以达到推荐水平。在基线(V1)和第2次就诊(V2)收集粪便DNA样本,并分析肠道微生物组概况,以评估微生物多样性,并在随后的CNR-JGH门诊就诊中,体重减轻(WL, N = 8)与维持/增加体重(WSG, N = 29)的患者中确定差异丰富的属。结果基线时更大的α -多样性和更高的毛螺旋体属丰度预示着患者对CNR-JGH干预(WSG在V2)有良好反应的可能性更高。虽然没有确定营养干预反应不良的预测因素(V2时的WL),但WL组的受试者在CNR-JGH干预后表现出更低的α多样性和更大的微生物种群不稳定性。结论:在参加癌症恶病质诊所的癌症相关体重减轻患者队列中,某些肠道微生物组特征与饮食干预的反应有关。在CNR-JGH干预后体重减轻的患者肠道微生物组的多样性和稳定性也较差。作为癌症恶病质多模式治疗的一部分,毛螺旋体属丰度是饮食干预后体重变化阳性反应的潜在预测因子,需要进一步的证实性研究。此外,有针对性的饮食方法维持多样性和肠道微生物群的稳定性可能在改善饮食干预对癌症恶病质的反应中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
12.40%
发文量
234
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to publishing materials related to cachexia and sarcopenia, as well as body composition and its physiological and pathophysiological changes across the lifespan and in response to various illnesses from all fields of life sciences. The journal aims to provide a reliable resource for professionals interested in related research or involved in the clinical care of affected patients, such as those suffering from AIDS, cancer, chronic heart failure, chronic lung disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney failure, rheumatoid arthritis, or sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信