Endoscopic management of acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients: A comprehensive review article

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-05-06 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70133
Akinori Maruta, Takuji Iwashita, Kensaku Yoshida, Shogo Shimizu, Masahito Shimizu
{"title":"Endoscopic management of acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients: A comprehensive review article","authors":"Akinori Maruta,&nbsp;Takuji Iwashita,&nbsp;Kensaku Yoshida,&nbsp;Shogo Shimizu,&nbsp;Masahito Shimizu","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Acute cholecystitis is frequently encountered in daily clinical practice, and early cholecystectomy is the standard therapy. In high-risk surgical patients, such as those with advanced age, deteriorated performance status, or underlying diseases, conservative treatment is typically preferred to manage acute cholecystitis. However, in patients with a disease that is refractory to conservative treatment, drainage procedures are necessary to control the infection. At present, there are three basic approaches for gallbladder drainage: percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage, and endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the appropriate treatment method is determined on a case-by-case basis, and no consistent strategy for gallbladder drainage has been established. This review aimed to summarize the characteristics of each drainage method and compare the clinical outcomes of the three procedures for acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70133","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute cholecystitis is frequently encountered in daily clinical practice, and early cholecystectomy is the standard therapy. In high-risk surgical patients, such as those with advanced age, deteriorated performance status, or underlying diseases, conservative treatment is typically preferred to manage acute cholecystitis. However, in patients with a disease that is refractory to conservative treatment, drainage procedures are necessary to control the infection. At present, there are three basic approaches for gallbladder drainage: percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage, and endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the appropriate treatment method is determined on a case-by-case basis, and no consistent strategy for gallbladder drainage has been established. This review aimed to summarize the characteristics of each drainage method and compare the clinical outcomes of the three procedures for acute cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients.

Abstract Image

内镜下治疗高危手术患者急性胆囊炎:一篇综合综述文章
急性胆囊炎是临床上常见的疾病,早期胆囊切除术是治疗的标准方法。对于高危手术患者,如高龄、运动状态恶化或有潜在疾病的患者,保守治疗通常是治疗急性胆囊炎的首选方法。然而,对于保守治疗难治性疾病的患者,引流手术是必要的,以控制感染。目前,胆囊引流的基本途径有三种:经皮经肝胆囊引流、内镜下经乳头胆囊引流、内镜下超声胆囊引流。每种方法都有优点和缺点。因此,适当的治疗方法是根据具体情况而定的,目前尚未建立一致的胆囊引流策略。本综述旨在总结每种引流方法的特点,并比较三种引流方法治疗高危外科患者急性胆囊炎的临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信