Dropout in Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders: A Systematic Review of Predictors

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Francesca De Salve, Chiara Rossi, Elena Gioacchini, Irene Messina, Osmano Oasi
{"title":"Dropout in Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders: A Systematic Review of Predictors","authors":"Francesca De Salve,&nbsp;Chiara Rossi,&nbsp;Elena Gioacchini,&nbsp;Irene Messina,&nbsp;Osmano Oasi","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Dropout in psychotherapy for personality disorders is a major challenge, affecting treatment efficacy and mental health care delivery. Influenced by patient characteristics, therapist factors and treatment dynamics, dropout remains prevalent. This systematic review identifies predictors of psychotherapy dropout in individuals with personality disorders to inform strategies that enhance treatment engagement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search in PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus identified 22 studies from 1976 articles. Inclusion criteria required DSM/ICD-based personality disorder assessments and dropout predictors in psychotherapy. Non-English or non–peer-reviewed studies were excluded. Screening followed PRISMA guidelines using Rayyan, and study quality was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Dropout rates ranged from 10.4% to 58%, depending on treatment modality and patient characteristics. Younger age, comorbid substance use disorders, emotional dysregulation, distress tolerance difficulties, childhood emotional abuse, therapist turnover and low motivation were significant predictors of dropout. Conversely, strong therapeutic alliances, mindfulness-based skills and engagement in phone coaching were associated with improved retention. Other relevant factors included low reflective functioning, lower education levels and socio-economic adversity, such as receiving disability benefits. Only one study identified low reflective functioning as a dropout predictor. Systemic factors, including treatment organization and care coordination, also played a crucial role.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Addressing dropout requires early engagement strategies, therapist continuity and treatment flexibility. Enhancing therapeutic alliance and reflective functioning may be particularly effective in reducing dropout. Systemic improvements, such as better care coordination and accessibility, are crucial for sustaining engagement and improving psychotherapy outcomes for individuals with personality disorders.</p>\n \n <p><b>Registration:</b> PROSPERO number: CRD42024509283</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Dropout in psychotherapy for personality disorders is a major challenge, affecting treatment efficacy and mental health care delivery. Influenced by patient characteristics, therapist factors and treatment dynamics, dropout remains prevalent. This systematic review identifies predictors of psychotherapy dropout in individuals with personality disorders to inform strategies that enhance treatment engagement.

Method

A systematic search in PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus identified 22 studies from 1976 articles. Inclusion criteria required DSM/ICD-based personality disorder assessments and dropout predictors in psychotherapy. Non-English or non–peer-reviewed studies were excluded. Screening followed PRISMA guidelines using Rayyan, and study quality was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results

Dropout rates ranged from 10.4% to 58%, depending on treatment modality and patient characteristics. Younger age, comorbid substance use disorders, emotional dysregulation, distress tolerance difficulties, childhood emotional abuse, therapist turnover and low motivation were significant predictors of dropout. Conversely, strong therapeutic alliances, mindfulness-based skills and engagement in phone coaching were associated with improved retention. Other relevant factors included low reflective functioning, lower education levels and socio-economic adversity, such as receiving disability benefits. Only one study identified low reflective functioning as a dropout predictor. Systemic factors, including treatment organization and care coordination, also played a crucial role.

Conclusions

Addressing dropout requires early engagement strategies, therapist continuity and treatment flexibility. Enhancing therapeutic alliance and reflective functioning may be particularly effective in reducing dropout. Systemic improvements, such as better care coordination and accessibility, are crucial for sustaining engagement and improving psychotherapy outcomes for individuals with personality disorders.

Registration: PROSPERO number: CRD42024509283

Abstract Image

人格障碍心理治疗的退出:预测因素的系统回顾
人格障碍心理治疗中的中途退出是一个重大挑战,影响着治疗效果和精神卫生保健的提供。受患者特点、治疗师因素和治疗动态的影响,辍学仍然普遍存在。本系统综述确定了人格障碍患者心理治疗退出的预测因素,为提高治疗参与度的策略提供信息。方法系统检索PsycINFO、PubMed和Scopus,从1976篇文章中筛选出22篇研究。纳入标准需要基于DSM/ icd的人格障碍评估和心理治疗中的辍学预测因子。非英语或非同行评议的研究被排除在外。使用Rayyan按照PRISMA指南进行筛选,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估研究质量。根据治疗方式和患者特点,中途退出率从10.4%到58%不等。年龄较小、共病物质使用障碍、情绪失调、痛苦耐受困难、童年情绪虐待、治疗师离职和低动机是辍学的显著预测因素。相反,强大的治疗联盟、基于正念的技能和参与电话辅导与提高记忆力有关。其他相关因素包括低反思功能、低教育水平和社会经济逆境,例如领取残疾津贴。只有一项研究发现,低反思能力是辍学的预测因素。包括治疗组织和护理协调在内的系统因素也起着至关重要的作用。解决辍学问题需要早期参与策略、治疗师的连续性和治疗的灵活性。加强治疗联盟和反思功能可能对减少辍学率特别有效。系统的改进,如更好的护理协调和可及性,对于维持参与和改善人格障碍患者的心理治疗结果至关重要。报名:普洛斯彼罗号码:CRD42024509283
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信