The Role of Ballasting, Seawater Viscosity and Oxygen-Dependent Remineralization for Export and Transfer Efficiencies in the Global Ocean

IF 5.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Onur Karakuş, Cara Nissen, Christoph Völker, Wilhelm Hagen, Morten Iversen, Laurent Oziel, Özgür Gürses, Judith Hauck
{"title":"The Role of Ballasting, Seawater Viscosity and Oxygen-Dependent Remineralization for Export and Transfer Efficiencies in the Global Ocean","authors":"Onur Karakuş,&nbsp;Cara Nissen,&nbsp;Christoph Völker,&nbsp;Wilhelm Hagen,&nbsp;Morten Iversen,&nbsp;Laurent Oziel,&nbsp;Özgür Gürses,&nbsp;Judith Hauck","doi":"10.1029/2024GB008403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The particulate organic carbon (POC) flux from the euphotic zone to the deep ocean is central to the biological carbon pump. It is typically evaluated using “export efficiency” and “transfer efficiency,” which reflect POC formation and sinking and carbon sequestration efficiency in the ocean's interior, respectively. Since observations of these metrics are limited, biogeochemical models can elucidate the controls of large-scale patterns. This study uses the global ocean-biogeochemical model FESOM-REcoM, with a new sinking routine that accounts for ballast minerals, seawater viscosity, and oxygen-dependent remineralization in POC sinking and remineralization, to identify the drivers of global export and transfer efficiency. We find that export efficiency is highest at high latitudes, where diatoms, mesozooplankton, and macrozooplankton dominate the plankton community, but that high export efficiency does not always imply high transfer efficiency. Omitting ballast minerals decreases export efficiency by 20% in the Southern Ocean, yet the globally integrated POC flux out of the euphotic zone (5.4–5.6 Pg C <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mtext>yr</mtext>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\text{yr}}^{-1}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) and the global average export efficiency (14.7%–15.4%) are relatively insensitive to seawater viscosity, mineral ballasting, or oxygen-dependent remineralization. In contrast, global transfer efficiency is more sensitive to these processes and varies between 21% and 25% in the simulations, with the largest reduction by 23% observed when omitting ballasting in subtropical, low-productivity regions. Our findings suggest that assumptions about ballasting and background sinking speed could explain previous discrepancies in the literature regarding the highest transfer efficiencies in low or high latitudes. Notably, while plankton community structure determines export efficiency regimes, zooplankton fecal pellets drive high transfer efficiencies in regions with high export efficiency, like the Southern Ocean.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"39 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GB008403","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The particulate organic carbon (POC) flux from the euphotic zone to the deep ocean is central to the biological carbon pump. It is typically evaluated using “export efficiency” and “transfer efficiency,” which reflect POC formation and sinking and carbon sequestration efficiency in the ocean's interior, respectively. Since observations of these metrics are limited, biogeochemical models can elucidate the controls of large-scale patterns. This study uses the global ocean-biogeochemical model FESOM-REcoM, with a new sinking routine that accounts for ballast minerals, seawater viscosity, and oxygen-dependent remineralization in POC sinking and remineralization, to identify the drivers of global export and transfer efficiency. We find that export efficiency is highest at high latitudes, where diatoms, mesozooplankton, and macrozooplankton dominate the plankton community, but that high export efficiency does not always imply high transfer efficiency. Omitting ballast minerals decreases export efficiency by 20% in the Southern Ocean, yet the globally integrated POC flux out of the euphotic zone (5.4–5.6 Pg C yr 1 ${\text{yr}}^{-1}$ ) and the global average export efficiency (14.7%–15.4%) are relatively insensitive to seawater viscosity, mineral ballasting, or oxygen-dependent remineralization. In contrast, global transfer efficiency is more sensitive to these processes and varies between 21% and 25% in the simulations, with the largest reduction by 23% observed when omitting ballasting in subtropical, low-productivity regions. Our findings suggest that assumptions about ballasting and background sinking speed could explain previous discrepancies in the literature regarding the highest transfer efficiencies in low or high latitudes. Notably, while plankton community structure determines export efficiency regimes, zooplankton fecal pellets drive high transfer efficiencies in regions with high export efficiency, like the Southern Ocean.

Abstract Image

压载、海水粘度和氧依赖再矿化对全球海洋出口和转移效率的作用
从光带到深海的颗粒有机碳(POC)通量是生物碳泵的核心。通常用“出口效率”和“转移效率”来评估,它们分别反映了海洋内部POC的形成和下沉以及碳固存效率。由于这些指标的观测是有限的,生物地球化学模型可以阐明大尺度模式的控制。本研究采用全球海洋生物地球化学模型FESOM-REcoM,采用考虑压舱矿物、海水粘度和POC下沉和再矿化过程中氧依赖再矿化的新下沉程序,识别全球出口和转移效率的驱动因素。研究发现,在以硅藻、中浮游动物和大型浮游动物为主的高纬度地区,出口效率最高,但出口效率高并不意味着转移效率高。遗漏压载矿物会使南大洋的出口效率降低20%,然而,全球综合POC通量(5.4-5.6 Pg C yr−1 ${\text{yr}}^{-1}$)和全球平均出口效率(14.7%-15.4%)对海水粘度、矿物压载、或者依赖氧的再矿化。相比之下,全球输送效率对这些过程更为敏感,在模拟中变化在21%到25%之间,在亚热带低生产力地区,当忽略压舱时,观察到的最大降幅为23%。我们的研究结果表明,关于压载和背景下沉速度的假设可以解释先前文献中关于低纬度或高纬度地区最高转移效率的差异。值得注意的是,虽然浮游生物群落结构决定了出口效率机制,但浮游动物粪便颗粒在出口效率高的地区(如南大洋)推动了高转移效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信