Length–Mass and Length–Weight Relationships of Japanese Freshwater Fishes

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q4 FISHERIES
Hikaru Nakagawa, Yuki Matsuzawa, Seiya Okamoto, Akira Nagayama, Yuki Mukai, Terutaka Mori
{"title":"Length–Mass and Length–Weight Relationships of Japanese Freshwater Fishes","authors":"Hikaru Nakagawa,&nbsp;Yuki Matsuzawa,&nbsp;Seiya Okamoto,&nbsp;Akira Nagayama,&nbsp;Yuki Mukai,&nbsp;Terutaka Mori","doi":"10.1155/jai/6613003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Relationships between weights (W, dry weight [DW] and wet weight [WW] and lengths L, standard length [SL], head length [HL], and caudal peduncle depth [CD]) and these between DW and WW were examined in 61 freshwater fishes using formula <i>W</i> = <i>a</i>L<sup><i>b</i></sup> and DW = <i>a</i>WW<sup><i>b</i></sup>, respectively. The parameters of the SL–DW, SL–WW, HL–DW, HL–WW, CD–DW, CD–WW, and WW–DW relationships were determined for 60, 61, 57, 58, 50, 50, and 61 taxa, respectively, with the criterion where the estimated R-square was greater than 0.8. For the genus or higher taxonomic level, parameters of the SL–DW and SL–WW relationships were determined for 20 taxonomic groups with the same criterion to each species. For the three eel-like species, the SL–DW and SL–WW relationships were largely consistent with the pooled taxonomic data. In contrast, noneel-like species exhibited variations in these relationships across species. Systematic variations in the SL–DW and SL–WW relationships were observed at the order and family levels, except in Salmonidae, Cobitidae, and Cottidae. However, at the genus level, these relationships were generally consistent among species. These intragroup variations should be considered when applying these equations to ecological and taxonomic studies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ichthyology","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jai/6613003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Ichthyology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jai/6613003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relationships between weights (W, dry weight [DW] and wet weight [WW] and lengths L, standard length [SL], head length [HL], and caudal peduncle depth [CD]) and these between DW and WW were examined in 61 freshwater fishes using formula W = aLb and DW = aWWb, respectively. The parameters of the SL–DW, SL–WW, HL–DW, HL–WW, CD–DW, CD–WW, and WW–DW relationships were determined for 60, 61, 57, 58, 50, 50, and 61 taxa, respectively, with the criterion where the estimated R-square was greater than 0.8. For the genus or higher taxonomic level, parameters of the SL–DW and SL–WW relationships were determined for 20 taxonomic groups with the same criterion to each species. For the three eel-like species, the SL–DW and SL–WW relationships were largely consistent with the pooled taxonomic data. In contrast, noneel-like species exhibited variations in these relationships across species. Systematic variations in the SL–DW and SL–WW relationships were observed at the order and family levels, except in Salmonidae, Cobitidae, and Cottidae. However, at the genus level, these relationships were generally consistent among species. These intragroup variations should be considered when applying these equations to ecological and taxonomic studies.

Abstract Image

日本淡水鱼的长度-质量和长度-重量关系
用公式W = aLb和DW = aWWb分别测定了61种淡水鱼类的体重(W、干重[DW]和湿重[WW]与长度L、标准长度[SL]、头长[HL]和尾柄深度[CD])与DW和WW之间的关系。分别确定了60、61、57、58、50、50和61个分类群的SL-DW、SL-WW、HL-DW、HL-WW、CD-DW、CD-WW和w - dw关系参数,估计r平方值大于0.8。在属及以上的分类水平上,对20个分类类群的SL-DW和SL-WW关系参数进行了测定,对每个物种采用相同的标准。对于3个类鳗鱼物种,SL-DW和SL-WW关系与汇总的分类数据基本一致。相比之下,非鳗鱼类物种在这些关系上表现出了跨物种的差异。SL-DW和SL-WW关系在各目和科水平上均存在系统差异,但在鲑科、舞螨科和舞螨科中存在差异。然而,在属水平上,这些关系在种之间基本一致。在将这些方程应用于生态学和分类学研究时,应考虑到这些群内变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Ichthyology
Journal of Applied Ichthyology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Ichthyology publishes articles of international repute on ichthyology, aquaculture, and marine fisheries; ichthyopathology and ichthyoimmunology; environmental toxicology using fishes as test organisms; basic research on fishery management; and aspects of integrated coastal zone management in relation to fisheries and aquaculture. Emphasis is placed on the application of scientific research findings, while special consideration is given to ichthyological problems occurring in developing countries. Article formats include original articles, review articles, short communications and technical reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信