The Potential Psychological Advantages of the Focusing-Oriented Therapy: A Pilot Quasiexperimental Study of “Proficiency as Focusing Partner” Training Workshop on Self-Compassion

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ming Yu Claudia Wong
{"title":"The Potential Psychological Advantages of the Focusing-Oriented Therapy: A Pilot Quasiexperimental Study of “Proficiency as Focusing Partner” Training Workshop on Self-Compassion","authors":"Ming Yu Claudia Wong","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/8466900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Focusing therapy, formulated by Eugene Gendlin (1969), is a body-centered technique that targets bodily sensations and aims at promoting self-care, self-awareness, and self-soothing. Focusing therapy helps people to be more aware of their inner feelings, achieve peace with a purpose without being overwhelmed by anxiety or depression, and enhance mindfulness and self-compassion. Focusing is therefore seen as a tool for developing self-compassion, thereby focusing on our inner feelings and needs and embracing and acknowledging our inner senses. However, there is a dearth of research on practical focusing therapy training workshops for general adults. Therefore, this study aims to be the first research study to investigate the effect of a complete four-level focusing-oriented workshop on self-compassion.</p>\n <p><b>Method:</b> Participants in this study were recruited using convenience sampling, specifically targeting those who had applied for the “Proficiency in Focusing Partnership” training workshop. 16 participants applied and actively engaged in all four levels of the workshop. Participants were asked to complete the questionnaire after finishing the second, third, and fourth levels of the workshop to analyze the influence of different levels of the workshop. The one-way repeated-measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the continuous changes in self-compassion across the three time points within the group.</p>\n <p><b>Results and Conclusion:</b> This pilot study addresses the lack of research on focusing therapy training workshops for the general population. The findings suggest that the “Proficiency in Focusing Partnership” training workshop can significantly improve self-compassion, mainly by reducing negative self-compassion. However, further development of evidence-based focusing-oriented interventions is needed.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/8466900","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/8466900","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Focusing therapy, formulated by Eugene Gendlin (1969), is a body-centered technique that targets bodily sensations and aims at promoting self-care, self-awareness, and self-soothing. Focusing therapy helps people to be more aware of their inner feelings, achieve peace with a purpose without being overwhelmed by anxiety or depression, and enhance mindfulness and self-compassion. Focusing is therefore seen as a tool for developing self-compassion, thereby focusing on our inner feelings and needs and embracing and acknowledging our inner senses. However, there is a dearth of research on practical focusing therapy training workshops for general adults. Therefore, this study aims to be the first research study to investigate the effect of a complete four-level focusing-oriented workshop on self-compassion.

Method: Participants in this study were recruited using convenience sampling, specifically targeting those who had applied for the “Proficiency in Focusing Partnership” training workshop. 16 participants applied and actively engaged in all four levels of the workshop. Participants were asked to complete the questionnaire after finishing the second, third, and fourth levels of the workshop to analyze the influence of different levels of the workshop. The one-way repeated-measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the continuous changes in self-compassion across the three time points within the group.

Results and Conclusion: This pilot study addresses the lack of research on focusing therapy training workshops for the general population. The findings suggest that the “Proficiency in Focusing Partnership” training workshop can significantly improve self-compassion, mainly by reducing negative self-compassion. However, further development of evidence-based focusing-oriented interventions is needed.

Abstract Image

聚焦导向治疗的潜在心理优势:自我同情“熟练作为聚焦伙伴”培训工作坊的试点拟实验研究
背景:聚焦疗法,由Eugene Gendlin(1969)提出,是一种以身体为中心的技术,以身体感觉为目标,旨在促进自我照顾,自我意识和自我抚慰。集中治疗可以帮助人们更好地意识到自己的内心感受,在不被焦虑或抑郁压倒的情况下实现有目的的平静,增强正念和自我同情。因此,专注被视为一种培养自我同情的工具,因此专注于我们内心的感受和需求,拥抱和承认我们内心的感觉。然而,对于一般成年人的实用聚焦治疗培训工作坊的研究却很缺乏。因此,本研究旨在首次探讨完整的四级聚焦导向工作坊对自我同情的影响。方法:本研究采用方便抽样法,针对已报名参加“聚焦伙伴关系熟练度”培训工作坊的人员进行招募。16名与会者申请并积极参加了讲习班的所有四个级别。参与者在完成第二层、第三层和第四层工作坊后完成问卷调查,分析工作坊不同层次的影响。采用单因素重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)检验自我同情在三个时间点上的连续变化。结果和结论:这项初步研究解决了针对普通人群的集中治疗培训研讨会研究的不足。研究结果表明,“专注伙伴关系熟练度”培训工作坊可以显著提高自我同情,主要是通过减少消极的自我同情。然而,需要进一步发展以证据为重点的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信