{"title":"Recent changes of now as a discourse marker in spoken English","authors":"Inji Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the evolving role of <em>now</em> in spoken English using data from two distinct corpora complied in the 1990s and 2010s. Analyses of randomly selected tokens distinguish occurrences of <em>now</em> as either a temporal adverb or a discourse marker (DM), with a focus on positional patterns, social factors (age and gender), functional distribution, and co-occurrences with other DMs. Findings reveal that while the DM <em>now</em> predominantly appears in turn- or utterance-initial positions, its occurrence in utterance-medial positions has notably increased, reflecting broader pragmatic development. The DM <em>now</em> is increasingly used for textual and affective functions, such as shifting topics, marking contrasts, or indicating stance, beyond its time-referential role. In terms of speaker demographics, the rise in DM <em>now</em> usage is largely driven by younger speakers, indicating a generational shift from two decades earlier; gender, however, does not significantly affect overall frequency. Analysis of DM co-occurrences shows that additive patterns are most frequent, whereas compositional and juxtaposed forms are less common. Overall, these results underscore the growing versatility of <em>now</em> in contemporary English, reflecting broader trends in discourse structuring, interaction management, and generational language shift.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"242 ","pages":"Pages 175-194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000955","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the evolving role of now in spoken English using data from two distinct corpora complied in the 1990s and 2010s. Analyses of randomly selected tokens distinguish occurrences of now as either a temporal adverb or a discourse marker (DM), with a focus on positional patterns, social factors (age and gender), functional distribution, and co-occurrences with other DMs. Findings reveal that while the DM now predominantly appears in turn- or utterance-initial positions, its occurrence in utterance-medial positions has notably increased, reflecting broader pragmatic development. The DM now is increasingly used for textual and affective functions, such as shifting topics, marking contrasts, or indicating stance, beyond its time-referential role. In terms of speaker demographics, the rise in DM now usage is largely driven by younger speakers, indicating a generational shift from two decades earlier; gender, however, does not significantly affect overall frequency. Analysis of DM co-occurrences shows that additive patterns are most frequent, whereas compositional and juxtaposed forms are less common. Overall, these results underscore the growing versatility of now in contemporary English, reflecting broader trends in discourse structuring, interaction management, and generational language shift.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.