Robust portfolio optimization considering the value of flexibility: Application to WTE technology portfolios

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Huanyue Chen, Junfei Hu, Sijun Bai, Guodong Shi
{"title":"Robust portfolio optimization considering the value of flexibility: Application to WTE technology portfolios","authors":"Huanyue Chen,&nbsp;Junfei Hu,&nbsp;Sijun Bai,&nbsp;Guodong Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optimizing waste-to-energy (WTE) technology portfolio is crucial for large waste treatment enterprises to attain sustainable profits and minimize risks in uncertain environments. A key issue is accurately assessing the return of individual technologies and mitigating the impact of parameter variations in portfolio optimization. Traditional portfolio methods rely heavily on precise input parameters. However, when these parameters inevitably fluctuate under uncertain conditions, the resulting strategies may become unreliable and not meet the expected return objectives. This paper introduces an innovative integration of the real options (RO) approach and robust portfolio optimization (RPO) to evaluate WTE technology portfolios. The proposed model assumes parameters fluctuate within an uncertainty set, overcoming the limitations of traditional portfolio models that rely on precise input parameters. It ensures the selected portfolio meets investors’ goals under worst-case scenarios and provides reassurance for investors. The proposed model compares favorably to the existing RPO models by incorporating the value of flexibility, which reflects realistic decision-making processes and better supports portfolio optimization. The empirical results demonstrate that the portfolio strategies generated by the proposed approach improved portfolio value and effectively ensured the investors’ return objectives, relative to portfolio strategies generated by traditional models. The methodologies and outcomes of this study offer valuable insights for investors, providing guidance on optimal investment strategies and assisting governments in policy optimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 108475"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325002993","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimizing waste-to-energy (WTE) technology portfolio is crucial for large waste treatment enterprises to attain sustainable profits and minimize risks in uncertain environments. A key issue is accurately assessing the return of individual technologies and mitigating the impact of parameter variations in portfolio optimization. Traditional portfolio methods rely heavily on precise input parameters. However, when these parameters inevitably fluctuate under uncertain conditions, the resulting strategies may become unreliable and not meet the expected return objectives. This paper introduces an innovative integration of the real options (RO) approach and robust portfolio optimization (RPO) to evaluate WTE technology portfolios. The proposed model assumes parameters fluctuate within an uncertainty set, overcoming the limitations of traditional portfolio models that rely on precise input parameters. It ensures the selected portfolio meets investors’ goals under worst-case scenarios and provides reassurance for investors. The proposed model compares favorably to the existing RPO models by incorporating the value of flexibility, which reflects realistic decision-making processes and better supports portfolio optimization. The empirical results demonstrate that the portfolio strategies generated by the proposed approach improved portfolio value and effectively ensured the investors’ return objectives, relative to portfolio strategies generated by traditional models. The methodologies and outcomes of this study offer valuable insights for investors, providing guidance on optimal investment strategies and assisting governments in policy optimization.
考虑灵活性价值的稳健投资组合优化:应用于WTE技术投资组合
优化垃圾发电技术组合是大型垃圾处理企业在不确定环境中实现可持续利润和最小化风险的关键。一个关键问题是准确地评估单个技术的回报,并减轻投资组合优化中参数变化的影响。传统的投资组合方法严重依赖于精确的输入参数。然而,当这些参数在不确定条件下不可避免地波动时,所得到的策略可能变得不可靠,无法达到预期的收益目标。本文介绍了一种将实物期权(RO)方法与稳健投资组合优化(RPO)方法相结合的创新方法来评估WTE技术投资组合。该模型假设参数在一个不确定集合内波动,克服了传统投资组合模型依赖精确输入参数的局限性。它确保所选择的投资组合在最坏的情况下满足投资者的目标,并为投资者提供保证。该模型与现有的RPO模型相比,具有较强的适应性,反映了现实的决策过程,能够更好地支持投资组合优化。实证结果表明,与传统模型生成的投资组合策略相比,本文方法生成的投资组合策略提高了投资组合价值,有效地保证了投资者的收益目标。本研究的方法和结果为投资者提供了有价值的见解,为最优投资策略提供了指导,并协助政府进行政策优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信