Reversing privatization: Political distortions and performance outcomes in Buenos Aires water services

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Ariel A. Casarin , Augusto Mercadier
{"title":"Reversing privatization: Political distortions and performance outcomes in Buenos Aires water services","authors":"Ariel A. Casarin ,&nbsp;Augusto Mercadier","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We contribute to the debate on privatization reversals by examining the performance of the sanitation service concession in Greater Buenos Aires, one of the world's largest, across multiple political cycles. Using index number theory, we decompose operating profit growth into productivity and price performance, comparing political cycles during two distinct phases: private management and subsequent return to public management. Our findings show that under private management, productivity improved while prices declined. However, the privatization reversal is associated with a marked decline in performance, with productivity falling at twice the rate of rising relative prices. This adverse effect was somewhat mitigated under right-leaning governments. Furthermore, after the reversal, output prices fluctuated in line with the political cycle, suggesting potential price manipulation for electoral advantage. We also note that the shift to public management coincided with increased non-revenue water and a possible ideologization of commercial customer complaints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 101957"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We contribute to the debate on privatization reversals by examining the performance of the sanitation service concession in Greater Buenos Aires, one of the world's largest, across multiple political cycles. Using index number theory, we decompose operating profit growth into productivity and price performance, comparing political cycles during two distinct phases: private management and subsequent return to public management. Our findings show that under private management, productivity improved while prices declined. However, the privatization reversal is associated with a marked decline in performance, with productivity falling at twice the rate of rising relative prices. This adverse effect was somewhat mitigated under right-leaning governments. Furthermore, after the reversal, output prices fluctuated in line with the political cycle, suggesting potential price manipulation for electoral advantage. We also note that the shift to public management coincided with increased non-revenue water and a possible ideologization of commercial customer complaints.
逆转私有化:布宜诺斯艾利斯供水服务的政治扭曲和绩效结果
我们通过研究大布宜诺斯艾利斯(世界上最大的卫生服务特许权之一)在多个政治周期中的表现,为私有化逆转的辩论做出了贡献。利用指数理论,我们将营业利润增长分解为生产率和价格表现,比较了两个不同阶段的政治周期:私人管理和随后回归公共管理。我们的研究结果表明,在私人管理下,生产率提高而价格下降。然而,私有化的逆转与业绩的显著下降有关,生产率下降的速度是相对价格上涨速度的两倍。在右倾政府的统治下,这种不利影响有所缓解。此外,在逆转之后,产出价格随政治周期波动,表明可能存在操纵价格以获得选举优势的情况。我们还注意到,向公共管理的转变恰逢非收入水的增加和商业客户投诉的可能意识形态化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信