Evaluating rehabilitation practices to inform invasion resistance in designed urban meadows

IF 9.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Garland Xie , J.Scott MacIvor
{"title":"Evaluating rehabilitation practices to inform invasion resistance in designed urban meadows","authors":"Garland Xie ,&nbsp;J.Scott MacIvor","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Efforts to restore urban green spaces (UGSs) aim to enhance benefits for both people and nature. Right-of-way (ROW) corridors, such as those beneath powerlines, offer key opportunities. By removing invasive species and introducing native plants through urban-adapted management practices, these spaces could become biodiverse UGSs in expanding cities. In this study we evaluate the effectiveness of invasive species management at “The Meadoway”, a ROW turned 16-km linear urban park underneath powerlines in Toronto, Canada. Here, newly-established sites were in progress and experienced rototilling, cover crops, and seed drilling of prepared native plant seed mixes to support the seed bank. Sites at the fully restored stage (<em>i.e.</em>, 5–8 years old) were completed and had established targeted native vegetation and litter biomass without further management. Between these restoration stages, we tested the relative role of invasibility (<em>i.e.</em>, biomass production and species richness of the resident community), disturbance from rototilling, and propagule pressure (<em>i.e.</em>, seed rain of <em>Vincetoxicum rossicum</em>, seed bank density and richness) on degree of invasion from multiple species. Overall, we found that degree of invasion is 78 % higher in newly-established sites that have experienced large-scale disturbance, and a denser seed bank reduces invasibility by 50 %. We recommend rototilling as a form of disturbance to prepare seed banks as 12 invasive species were found to be of low management priority. Second, existing practices can also be adapted to encourage more native seeds to delay incipient biological invasions. Our findings and recommendations are adaptable, making them suitable for widespread application in ROWs, which are common. This flexibility allows for the broad implementation of designed urban meadows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 105386"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625000933","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efforts to restore urban green spaces (UGSs) aim to enhance benefits for both people and nature. Right-of-way (ROW) corridors, such as those beneath powerlines, offer key opportunities. By removing invasive species and introducing native plants through urban-adapted management practices, these spaces could become biodiverse UGSs in expanding cities. In this study we evaluate the effectiveness of invasive species management at “The Meadoway”, a ROW turned 16-km linear urban park underneath powerlines in Toronto, Canada. Here, newly-established sites were in progress and experienced rototilling, cover crops, and seed drilling of prepared native plant seed mixes to support the seed bank. Sites at the fully restored stage (i.e., 5–8 years old) were completed and had established targeted native vegetation and litter biomass without further management. Between these restoration stages, we tested the relative role of invasibility (i.e., biomass production and species richness of the resident community), disturbance from rototilling, and propagule pressure (i.e., seed rain of Vincetoxicum rossicum, seed bank density and richness) on degree of invasion from multiple species. Overall, we found that degree of invasion is 78 % higher in newly-established sites that have experienced large-scale disturbance, and a denser seed bank reduces invasibility by 50 %. We recommend rototilling as a form of disturbance to prepare seed banks as 12 invasive species were found to be of low management priority. Second, existing practices can also be adapted to encourage more native seeds to delay incipient biological invasions. Our findings and recommendations are adaptable, making them suitable for widespread application in ROWs, which are common. This flexibility allows for the broad implementation of designed urban meadows.
在设计的城市草甸中评估康复实践以提供入侵抵抗信息
恢复城市绿地的努力旨在提高人与自然的利益。路权走廊(Right-of-way, ROW),比如电力线下面的走廊,提供了关键的机会。通过消除外来入侵物种和引入本地植物,这些空间可以在不断扩大的城市中成为生物多样性的ugs。在这项研究中,我们评估了“草甸”入侵物种管理的有效性,“草甸”是加拿大多伦多电线杆下的一个16公里长的线性城市公园。在这里,新建立的站点正在进行中,并经历了旋耕法、覆盖作物和准备好的本地植物种子混合物的种子钻探,以支持种子库。在完全恢复阶段(即5-8年)的地点已经完成,并建立了目标的原生植被和凋落物生物量,而无需进一步管理。在这些恢复阶段之间,我们测试了入侵性(即常驻群落的生物量和物种丰富度)、轮作干扰和繁殖体压力(即长春花种子雨、种子库密度和丰富度)对多物种入侵程度的相对作用。总体而言,我们发现在经历过大规模干扰的新建立的地点,入侵程度高出78%,而更密集的种子库将入侵程度降低了50%。由于发现12种入侵物种的管理优先度较低,我们建议采用旋耕法作为一种干扰形式来建立种子库。其次,也可以调整现有的做法,鼓励更多的本地种子,以延缓早期的生物入侵。我们的研究结果和建议具有适应性,使它们适合在row中广泛应用,这是常见的。这种灵活性允许广泛实施设计的城市草地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信