Machine Learning-Based Algorithm to Predict Procedural Success in a Large European Cohort of Hybrid Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alice Moroni MD , Andrea Mascaretti PhD , Jo Dens MD, PhD , Paul Knaapen MD, PhD , Alexander Nap MD, PhD , Yvemarie B.O. Somsen MD , Johan Bennett MD, PhD , Claudiu Ungureanu MD , Yoann Bataille MD , Steven Haine MD, PhD , Patrick Coussement MD , Peter Kayaert MD, PhD , Alexander Avran MD, PhD , Jeroen Sonck MD, PhD , Carlos Collet MD, PhD , Stéphane Carlier MD, PhD , Giovanni Vescovo MD , Giacomo Avesani MD , Mohaned Egred MD , James C. Spratt MD, PhD , Carlo Zivelonghi MD, PhD, MSc
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Algorithm to Predict Procedural Success in a Large European Cohort of Hybrid Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions","authors":"Alice Moroni MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Mascaretti PhD ,&nbsp;Jo Dens MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Paul Knaapen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexander Nap MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yvemarie B.O. Somsen MD ,&nbsp;Johan Bennett MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Claudiu Ungureanu MD ,&nbsp;Yoann Bataille MD ,&nbsp;Steven Haine MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Patrick Coussement MD ,&nbsp;Peter Kayaert MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Alexander Avran MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jeroen Sonck MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carlos Collet MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Stéphane Carlier MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Giovanni Vescovo MD ,&nbsp;Giacomo Avesani MD ,&nbsp;Mohaned Egred MD ,&nbsp;James C. Spratt MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carlo Zivelonghi MD, PhD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>CTOs are frequently encountered in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography. Even though technical progress in CTO-PCI and enhanced skills of dedicated operators have led to substantial procedural improvement, the success of the intervention is still lower than in non-CTO PCI. Moreover, the scores developed to appraise lesion complexity and predict procedural outcomes have shown suboptimal discriminatory performance when applied to unselected cohorts. Accordingly, we sought to develop a machine learning (ML)-based model integrating clinical and angiographic characteristics to predict procedural success of chronic total occlusion (CTO)-percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Different ML-models were trained on a European multicenter cohort of 8904 patients undergoing attempted CTO-PCI according to the hybrid algorithm (randomly divided into a training set [75%] and a test set [25%]). Sixteen clinical and 16 angiographic variables routinely assessed were used to inform the models; procedural volume of each center was also considered together with 3 angiographic complexity scores (namely, J-CTO, PROGRESS-CTO and RECHARGE scores). The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve was employed, as metric score. The performance of the model was also compared with that of 3 existing complexity scores. The best selected ML-model (Light Gradient Boosting Machine [LightGBM]) for procedural success prediction showed an AUC of 0.82 and 0.73 in the training and test set, respectively. The accuracy of the ML-based model outperformed those of the conventional scores (J-CTO AUC 0.66, PROGRESS-CTO AUC 0.62, RECHARGE AUC 0.64, p-value &lt;0.01 for all the pairwise comparisons). In conclusion, the implementation of a ML-based model to predict procedural success in CTO-PCIs showed good prediction accuracy, thus potentially providing new elements for a tailored management. Prospective validation studies should be conducted in real-world settings, integrating ML-based model into operator decision-making processes in order to validate this new approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"248 ","pages":"Pages 50-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925002334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CTOs are frequently encountered in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography. Even though technical progress in CTO-PCI and enhanced skills of dedicated operators have led to substantial procedural improvement, the success of the intervention is still lower than in non-CTO PCI. Moreover, the scores developed to appraise lesion complexity and predict procedural outcomes have shown suboptimal discriminatory performance when applied to unselected cohorts. Accordingly, we sought to develop a machine learning (ML)-based model integrating clinical and angiographic characteristics to predict procedural success of chronic total occlusion (CTO)-percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Different ML-models were trained on a European multicenter cohort of 8904 patients undergoing attempted CTO-PCI according to the hybrid algorithm (randomly divided into a training set [75%] and a test set [25%]). Sixteen clinical and 16 angiographic variables routinely assessed were used to inform the models; procedural volume of each center was also considered together with 3 angiographic complexity scores (namely, J-CTO, PROGRESS-CTO and RECHARGE scores). The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve was employed, as metric score. The performance of the model was also compared with that of 3 existing complexity scores. The best selected ML-model (Light Gradient Boosting Machine [LightGBM]) for procedural success prediction showed an AUC of 0.82 and 0.73 in the training and test set, respectively. The accuracy of the ML-based model outperformed those of the conventional scores (J-CTO AUC 0.66, PROGRESS-CTO AUC 0.62, RECHARGE AUC 0.64, p-value <0.01 for all the pairwise comparisons). In conclusion, the implementation of a ML-based model to predict procedural success in CTO-PCIs showed good prediction accuracy, thus potentially providing new elements for a tailored management. Prospective validation studies should be conducted in real-world settings, integrating ML-based model into operator decision-making processes in order to validate this new approach.
基于机器学习的算法预测大型欧洲混合慢性全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的手术成功率
在有创冠状动脉造影患者中经常遇到CTOs。尽管CTO-PCI的技术进步和专业操作人员技能的提高导致了实质性的程序改进,但干预的成功率仍然低于非cto PCI。此外,用于评估病变复杂性和预测手术结果的评分在应用于未选择的队列时显示出次优的歧视性表现。因此,我们试图开发一种基于机器学习(ML)的模型,整合临床和血管造影特征,以预测慢性全闭塞(CTO)-经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的手术成功率。根据混合算法(随机分为训练集[75%]和测试集[25%]),对8904例尝试CTO-PCI的欧洲多中心队列进行不同的ml模型训练。常规评估的16个临床变量和16个血管造影变量用于模型;同时考虑各中心的手术容积以及3个血管造影复杂性评分(即J-CTO、PROGRESS-CTO和RECHARGE评分)。采用受试者工作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)作为度量评分。并将该模型的性能与现有的3种复杂度评分进行了比较。选择的最佳ml模型(Light Gradient Boosting Machine [LightGBM])用于程序成功预测,在训练集和测试集上的AUC分别为0.82和0.73。基于ml的模型的准确率优于传统评分(J-CTO AUC 0.66, PROGRESS-CTO AUC 0.62, RECHARGE AUC 0.64, p值<;0.01)。总之,采用基于ml的模型预测cto - pci的手术成功率显示出良好的预测准确性,从而有可能为量身定制的管理提供新的元素。为了验证这种新方法,应该在现实环境中进行前瞻性验证研究,将基于ml的模型集成到作业者的决策过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信