Deep learning-based segmentation of OCT images for choroidal thickness

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Raman Prasad Sah, Nimesh B. Patel, Hope M. Queener, Pavan K. Narra, Lisa A. Ostrin
{"title":"Deep learning-based segmentation of OCT images for choroidal thickness","authors":"Raman Prasad Sah,&nbsp;Nimesh B. Patel,&nbsp;Hope M. Queener,&nbsp;Pavan K. Narra,&nbsp;Lisa A. Ostrin","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2025.100556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To develop and validate a custom deep learning-based automated segmentation for choroidal thickness of optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An in-house automated algorithm was trained on a Deeplabv3+ network, based on ResNet50, using a training set of 10,798 manually segmented OCT scans (accuracy 99.25% and loss 0.0229). A test set of 130 unique scans was segmented using manual and in-house automated methods. For manual segmentation, the choroid-sclera border was delineated by the user. For in-house automated segmentation, all borders were automatically detected by the program and manually inspected. Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Deming regression compared the central 1-mm diameter and 3-mm and 6-mm annuli for the two methods. The in-house method was also compared with an open-source algorithm for the test set of 130 scans.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean choroidal thicknesses obtained with manual and in-house automated methods were not significantly different for the three regions (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05 for all). The fixed bias between methods ranged from -2.41 to 3.49 µm. Proportional bias ranged from -0.04 to -0.12 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05 for all). The two methods demonstrated excellent agreement across regions (ICC: 0.96 to 0.98, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for all). The open-source automated method consistently resulted in thinner choroidal thickness compared to manual and in-house automated methods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Custom in-house deep learning automated choroid segmentation demonstrated excellent agreement and strong positive linear relationship with manual segmentation. The automated approach holds distinct advantages for estimating choroidal thickness, being more objective and efficient than the manual approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"18 2","pages":"Article 100556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429625000226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and validate a custom deep learning-based automated segmentation for choroidal thickness of optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans.

Methods

An in-house automated algorithm was trained on a Deeplabv3+ network, based on ResNet50, using a training set of 10,798 manually segmented OCT scans (accuracy 99.25% and loss 0.0229). A test set of 130 unique scans was segmented using manual and in-house automated methods. For manual segmentation, the choroid-sclera border was delineated by the user. For in-house automated segmentation, all borders were automatically detected by the program and manually inspected. Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Deming regression compared the central 1-mm diameter and 3-mm and 6-mm annuli for the two methods. The in-house method was also compared with an open-source algorithm for the test set of 130 scans.

Results

Mean choroidal thicknesses obtained with manual and in-house automated methods were not significantly different for the three regions (P > 0.05 for all). The fixed bias between methods ranged from -2.41 to 3.49 µm. Proportional bias ranged from -0.04 to -0.12 (P < 0.05 for all). The two methods demonstrated excellent agreement across regions (ICC: 0.96 to 0.98, P < 0.001 for all). The open-source automated method consistently resulted in thinner choroidal thickness compared to manual and in-house automated methods.

Conclusions

Custom in-house deep learning automated choroid segmentation demonstrated excellent agreement and strong positive linear relationship with manual segmentation. The automated approach holds distinct advantages for estimating choroidal thickness, being more objective and efficient than the manual approach.
基于深度学习的脉络膜厚度OCT图像分割
目的开发并验证一种基于深度学习的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)脉络膜厚度自动分割方法。方法内部自动算法在Deeplabv3+网络上进行训练,基于ResNet50,使用10,798个手动分割OCT扫描的训练集(准确率99.25%,损失0.0229)。使用手动和内部自动化方法对130个独立扫描的测试集进行了分割。对于人工分割,脉络膜-巩膜边界由用户划定。对于内部自动分割,所有边界都由程序自动检测并手动检查。Bland-Altman分析、类内相关系数(ICC)和Deming回归比较了两种方法的中心直径1 mm、3 mm和6 mm环空。对于130个扫描的测试集,还将内部方法与开源算法进行了比较。结果手工方法和内部自动方法获得的平均脉络膜厚度在三个区域无显著差异(P >;0.05)。方法间的固定偏差范围为-2.41 ~ 3.49µm。比例偏差范围为-0.04至-0.12 (P <;0.05)。两种方法在区域间表现出极好的一致性(ICC: 0.96 ~ 0.98, P <;0.001)。与手工和内部自动化方法相比,开源自动化方法始终导致脉络膜厚度更薄。结论自定义内部深度学习自动脉络膜分割与人工分割具有良好的一致性和强的正线性关系。自动方法在估计脉络膜厚度方面具有明显的优势,比人工方法更客观、更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信