{"title":"Developing all-solid-waste-based curing agents with net-zero emissions for engineering sediment waste stabilization","authors":"Zhen Qi , Jiangshan Li , Guangping Huang , Feng Zhong , Qiang Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study developed all-solid-waste-based curing agents using industrial solid wastes—ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), carbide slag (CS), and sulfate solid wastes (electrolytic manganese residue (EMR), desulfurized-gypsum (DG), and phosphogypsum (PG))—to stabilize engineering sediment waste (ESW). Based on the simplex centroid design, three ternary curing agents (GGBS-EMR-CS (GEC), GGBS-DG-CS (GDC), and GGBS-PG-CS (GPC)) were prepared. The optimal ratios for GEC, GDC, and GPC are 60:12:28, 70:27:3, and 70:21:9, respectively. Compared to ordinary Portland cement (OPC), the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of ESW stabilized with these curing agents increased by 78 %, 178 %, and 98 %, respectively. Sulfate components synergistically activates GGBS and CS, promoting needle-like ettringite (AFt) formation, which fills pores and enhances strength. Meanwhile, CO₂ emissions and costs were reduced up to 99 % and 73 %, respectively. This study developed all-solid-waste-based curing agents with excellent mechanical performance, low costs, and near net-zero emissions, which provided a sustainable solution for ESW stabilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108354"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002332","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study developed all-solid-waste-based curing agents using industrial solid wastes—ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), carbide slag (CS), and sulfate solid wastes (electrolytic manganese residue (EMR), desulfurized-gypsum (DG), and phosphogypsum (PG))—to stabilize engineering sediment waste (ESW). Based on the simplex centroid design, three ternary curing agents (GGBS-EMR-CS (GEC), GGBS-DG-CS (GDC), and GGBS-PG-CS (GPC)) were prepared. The optimal ratios for GEC, GDC, and GPC are 60:12:28, 70:27:3, and 70:21:9, respectively. Compared to ordinary Portland cement (OPC), the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of ESW stabilized with these curing agents increased by 78 %, 178 %, and 98 %, respectively. Sulfate components synergistically activates GGBS and CS, promoting needle-like ettringite (AFt) formation, which fills pores and enhances strength. Meanwhile, CO₂ emissions and costs were reduced up to 99 % and 73 %, respectively. This study developed all-solid-waste-based curing agents with excellent mechanical performance, low costs, and near net-zero emissions, which provided a sustainable solution for ESW stabilization.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.