{"title":"Climate change and Carbon policy: A story of optimal green macroprudential and capital flow management","authors":"Anh H. Le","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the macro-financial impact of carbon policy and the role of reserve requirements in managing climate-related transition risks. Empirical evidence shows that carbon policy shocks lead to a 0.7% output loss, a 0.3% rise in inflation, financial instability, and sectoral reallocation effects. Using a macro-financial DSGE model with environmental features, the model predicts that a 40% GHG emissions reduction results in a 0.7% output loss, while achieving net-zero emissions over 30 years causes a 2.7% medium-term output loss. The analysis underscores the banking sector’s amplified role during the transition and the benefits of pre-announced carbon policies in reducing inflation volatility by 0.2%. Utilizing a heterogeneous approach with macroprudential tools, I find that optimal macroprudential tools can mitigate the output loss by 0.1% and investment loss by 0.5%. Importantly, my work highlights the use of capital flow management in the green transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 108501"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325003251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper investigates the macro-financial impact of carbon policy and the role of reserve requirements in managing climate-related transition risks. Empirical evidence shows that carbon policy shocks lead to a 0.7% output loss, a 0.3% rise in inflation, financial instability, and sectoral reallocation effects. Using a macro-financial DSGE model with environmental features, the model predicts that a 40% GHG emissions reduction results in a 0.7% output loss, while achieving net-zero emissions over 30 years causes a 2.7% medium-term output loss. The analysis underscores the banking sector’s amplified role during the transition and the benefits of pre-announced carbon policies in reducing inflation volatility by 0.2%. Utilizing a heterogeneous approach with macroprudential tools, I find that optimal macroprudential tools can mitigate the output loss by 0.1% and investment loss by 0.5%. Importantly, my work highlights the use of capital flow management in the green transition.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.